60
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Responding to the 2018–2020 Ebola Virus Outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: Rethinking Humanitarian Approaches

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) presents a challenging context in which to respond to public health crises. Its 2018–2020 Ebola outbreak was the second largest in history. Lessons were known from the previous West African outbreak. Chief among these was the recognition that local action and involvement are key to establishing effective epidemic-response. It remains unclear whether and how this was achieved in DRC’s Ebola response. Additionally, there is a lack of scholarship on how to build resilience (the ability to adapt or transform under pressure) in crisis-response. In this article, we critically review literature to examine evidence on whether and how communities were involved, trust built, and resilience strengthened through adaptation or transformation of DRC’s 2018–2020 Ebola response measures. Overall, we found limited evidence that the response adapted to engage and involve local actors and institutions or respond to locally expressed concerns. When adaptations occurred, they were shaped by national and international actors rather than enabling local actors to develop locally trusted initiatives. Communities were “engaged” to understand their perceptions but were not involved in decision-making or shaping responses. Few studies documented how trust was built or analyzed power dynamics between different groups in DRC. Yet, both these elements appear to be critical in building effective, resilient responses. These failures occurred because there was no willingness by the national government or international agencies to concede decision-making power to local people. Emergency humanitarian response is entrenched in highly medicalized, military style command and control approaches which have no space for decentralizing decision-making to “non-experts”. To transform humanitarian responses, international responders can no longer be regarded as “experts” who own the knowledge and control the response. To successfully tackle future humanitarian crises requires a transformation of international humanitarian and emergency response systems such that they are led, or shaped, through inclusive, equitable collaboration with local actors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references76

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Reforming the health sector in developing countries: the central role of policy analysis

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Risk Manag Healthc Policy
                Risk Manag Healthc Policy
                rmhp
                rmhp
                Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
                Dove
                1179-1594
                28 April 2021
                2021
                : 14
                : 1731-1747
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London, UK
                [2 ]Bukavu Medical University College/Institut Supérieur des Techniques Médicales de Bukavu (ISTM-Bukavu) , Bukavu, Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo
                [3 ]Centre de Recherche sur la Démocratie et le Développement en Afrique (CREDDA), Université Libre des Pays des Grands Lacs , Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo
                [4 ]School of Environmental Sciences, Njala University , Freetown, Sierra Leone
                [5 ]Hygiene, State Administration , Kikwit, Democratic Republic of Congo
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Susannah H Mayhew Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1E 9SH, UK Email Susannah.mayhew@lshtm.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2433-3809
                Article
                219295
                10.2147/RMHP.S219295
                8092619
                33953623
                b261b2f3-eb5c-417d-b194-932bbc5abe42
                © 2021 Mayhew et al.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 15 December 2020
                : 20 March 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, References: 88, Pages: 17
                Categories
                Review

                Social policy & Welfare
                democratic republic of congo,ebola,pandemic response,humanitarian emergency,community,social science

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content87

                Cited by16

                Most referenced authors535