7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial

      research-article
      1 , 1 , , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , Sarilumab-COVID-19 Study Team
      Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
      Oxford University Press
      monoclonal antibodies, Interleukin-6 receptor, hospitalized, COVID-19

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Open-label platform trials and a prospective meta-analysis suggest efficacy of anti–IL-6R therapies in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 receiving corticosteroids. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of sarilumab, an anti–IL-6R monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

          Methods

          In this adaptive, phase 2/3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adults hospitalized with COVID-19 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04315298) received intravenous sarilumab or placebo. The phase 3 primary analysis population included patients with critical COVID-19 receiving mechanical ventilation randomized to sarilumab 400 mg or placebo. The primary outcome was proportion of patients with ≥1-point improvement in clinical status from baseline to day 22.

          Results

          There were 457 and 1365 patients randomized and treated in phases 2 and 3, respectively. In phase 3, patients with critical COVID-19 receiving mechanical ventilation ( n = 298; 28.2% on corticosteroids), the proportion with ≥1-point improvement in clinical status (alive, not receiving mechanical ventilation) at day 22 was 43.2% in sarilumab and 35.5% in placebo (risk difference +7.5%; 95% CI, –7.4 to 21.3; P = .3261), a relative risk improvement of 21.7%. In post-hoc analyses pooling phase 2 and 3 critical patients receiving mechanical ventilation, the hazard ratio for death in sarilumab versus placebo was 0.76 (95% CI, .51–1.13) overall and 0.49 (95% CI, .25–.94) in patients receiving corticosteroids at baseline.

          Conclusions

          This study did not establish the efficacy of sarilumab in hospitalized patients with severe/critical COVID-19. Post-hoc analyses were consistent with other studies that found a benefit of sarilumab in patients receiving corticosteroids.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Clin Infect Dis
          Clin Infect Dis
          cid
          Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
          Oxford University Press (US )
          1058-4838
          1537-6591
          26 February 2022
          26 February 2022
          : ciac153
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Tarrytown, New York
          [2 ] Institute for Clinical Outcomes Research, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, and Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell , Northwell Health, Hempstead, New York
          [3 ] Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
          [4 ] Montefiore – Moses , Bronx, New York
          [5 ] Holy Name Medical Center , Teaneck, New Jersey
          [6 ] Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine and Hackensack University Medical Center , Hackensack, New Jersey
          [7 ] NYC Health + Hospitals/Lincoln , Bronx, New York
          [8 ] Jacobi Medical Center , Bronx, New York
          [9 ] Columbia University , New York, New York
          [10 ] Pulmonary and Sleep Disorder Clinic, Valley Medical Center , Renton, Washington
          [11 ] Division of Infectious Diseases, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, New York
          [12 ] Intermountain Medical Center and University of Utah , Salt Lake City, Utah
          Author notes
          Corresponding author: David Lederer, MD, MS, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 777 Old Saw Mill River Rd, Tarrytown, NY 10591 Phone: +1 914-847-7000; Email: david.lederer@ 123456regeneron.com
          Alternate corresponding author: Michael C. Nivens, PhD, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 777 Old Saw Mill River Rd, Tarrytown, NY 10591 Phone: +1 914-847-7000; Email: chad.nivens@ 123456regeneron.com
          Article
          ciac153
          10.1093/cid/ciac153
          8903479
          35219277
          b2614199-13d6-42bc-84ad-52a839b1e398
          © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

          This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

          History
          : 12 November 2021
          Categories
          Major Article
          AcademicSubjects/MED00290
          Custom metadata
          PAP
          accepted-manuscript

          Infectious disease & Microbiology
          monoclonal antibodies,interleukin-6 receptor,hospitalized,covid-19

          Comments

          Comment on this article