6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Update on the diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) – revised recommendations of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). Part II: Attack therapy and long-term management

      review-article
      1 , , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 1 , 4 , 10 , 11 , 4 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 3 , 17 , 5 , 18 , 9 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 11 , 19 , 22 , 12 , 2 , , The Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS)
      Journal of Neurology
      Springer Berlin Heidelberg
      Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), Attacks, Disability, Aquaporin-4 (AQP4), Double-negative NMOSD, Immunotherapies, Long-term management

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This manuscript presents practical recommendations for managing acute attacks and implementing preventive immunotherapies for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), a rare autoimmune disease that causes severe inflammation in the central nervous system (CNS), primarily affecting the optic nerves, spinal cord, and brainstem. The pillars of NMOSD therapy are attack treatment and attack prevention to minimize the accrual of neurological disability. Aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G antibodies (AQP4-IgG) are a diagnostic marker of the disease and play a significant role in its pathogenicity. Recent advances in understanding NMOSD have led to the development of new therapies and the completion of randomized controlled trials. Four preventive immunotherapies have now been approved for AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD in many regions of the world: eculizumab, ravulizumab - most recently-, inebilizumab, and satralizumab. These new drugs may potentially substitute rituximab and classical immunosuppressive therapies, which were as yet the mainstay of treatment for both, AQP4-IgG-positive and -negative NMOSD. Here, the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS) provides an overview of the current state of knowledge on NMOSD treatments and offers statements and practical recommendations on the therapy management and use of all available immunotherapies for this disease. Unmet needs and AQP4-IgG-negative NMOSD are also discussed. The recommendations were developed using a Delphi-based consensus method among the core author group and at expert discussions at NEMOS meetings.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-023-11910-z.

          Related collections

          Most cited references256

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

          Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is an inflammatory CNS syndrome distinct from multiple sclerosis (MS) that is associated with serum aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G antibodies (AQP4-IgG). Prior NMO diagnostic criteria required optic nerve and spinal cord involvement but more restricted or more extensive CNS involvement may occur. The International Panel for NMO Diagnosis (IPND) was convened to develop revised diagnostic criteria using systematic literature reviews and electronic surveys to facilitate consensus. The new nomenclature defines the unifying term NMO spectrum disorders (NMOSD), which is stratified further by serologic testing (NMOSD with or without AQP4-IgG). The core clinical characteristics required for patients with NMOSD with AQP4-IgG include clinical syndromes or MRI findings related to optic nerve, spinal cord, area postrema, other brainstem, diencephalic, or cerebral presentations. More stringent clinical criteria, with additional neuroimaging findings, are required for diagnosis of NMOSD without AQP4-IgG or when serologic testing is unavailable. The IPND also proposed validation strategies and achieved consensus on pediatric NMOSD diagnosis and the concepts of monophasic NMOSD and opticospinal MS.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice - Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Eighth Special Issue.

            The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis (TA) in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor in order to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Eighth Edition, like its predecessor, continues to apply the category and grading system definitions in fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was introduced in the Fourth Edition, has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of TA in a specific disease entity or medical condition. The Eighth Edition comprises 84 fact sheets for relevant diseases and medical conditions, with 157 graded and categorized indications and/or TA modalities. The Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue seeks to continue to serve as a key resource that guides the utilization of TA in the treatment of human disease.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              MOG encephalomyelitis: international recommendations on diagnosis and antibody testing

              Over the past few years, new-generation cell-based assays have demonstrated a robust association of autoantibodies to full-length human myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) with (mostly recurrent) optic neuritis, myelitis and brainstem encephalitis, as well as with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM)-like presentations. Most experts now consider MOG-IgG-associated encephalomyelitis (MOG-EM) a disease entity in its own right, immunopathogenetically distinct from both classic multiple sclerosis (MS) and aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). Owing to a substantial overlap in clinicoradiological presentation, MOG-EM was often unwittingly misdiagnosed as MS in the past. Accordingly, increasing numbers of patients with suspected or established MS are currently being tested for MOG-IgG. However, screening of large unselected cohorts for rare biomarkers can significantly reduce the positive predictive value of a test. To lessen the hazard of overdiagnosing MOG-EM, which may lead to inappropriate treatment, more selective criteria for MOG-IgG testing are urgently needed. In this paper, we propose indications for MOG-IgG testing based on expert consensus. In addition, we give a list of conditions atypical for MOG-EM (“red flags”) that should prompt physicians to challenge a positive MOG-IgG test result. Finally, we provide recommendations regarding assay methodology, specimen sampling and data interpretation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Tania.Kuempfel@med.uni-muenchen.de
                achim.berthele@tum.de
                Journal
                J Neurol
                J Neurol
                Journal of Neurology
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0340-5354
                1432-1459
                7 September 2023
                7 September 2023
                2024
                : 271
                : 1
                : 141-176
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Clinical Neuroimmunology, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, ( https://ror.org/05591te55) Munich, Germany
                [2 ]GRID grid.6936.a, ISNI 0000000123222966, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, , Technical University Munich, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, ; Munich, Germany
                [3 ]Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, ( https://ror.org/024z2rq82) Düsseldorf, Germany
                [4 ]GRID grid.416438.c, Department of Neurology, , St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, ; Bochum, Germany
                [5 ]GRID grid.6363.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2218 4662, Department of Neurology, , Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, ; Berlin, Germany
                [6 ]Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a cooperation between the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association and Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, ( https://ror.org/04p5ggc03) Berlin, Germany
                [7 ]Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), ( https://ror.org/04p5ggc03) Berlin, Germany
                [8 ]GRID grid.6363.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2218 4662, NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, , Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, and Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, ; Berlin, Germany
                [9 ]Department of Neurology and Institute of Neuroimmunology and MS (INIMS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, ( https://ror.org/01zgy1s35) Hamburg, Germany
                [10 ]Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, ( https://ror.org/00f2yqf98) Hannover, Germany
                [11 ]Molecular Neuroimmunology Group, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, ( https://ror.org/038t36y30) Heidelberg, Germany
                [12 ]GRID grid.518588.9, ISNI 0000 0004 0619 3616, Marianne-Strauß-Klinik, Behandlungszentrum Kempfenhausen für Multiple Sklerose Kranke, ; Berg, Germany
                [13 ]Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, ( https://ror.org/00pd74e08) Münster, Germany
                [14 ]Department of Neurology and Pain Treatment, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, University Hospital of the Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany
                [15 ]GRID grid.473452.3, Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, , Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, ; Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany
                [16 ]GRID grid.411544.1, ISNI 0000 0001 0196 8249, Department of Neurology & Stroke, , University Hospital of Tübingen, ; Tübingen, Germany
                [17 ]Department of Neurology, Center for Neurology and Neuropsychiatry, LVR-Klinikum, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, ( https://ror.org/024z2rq82) Düsseldorf, Germany
                [18 ]Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, ( https://ror.org/032000t02) Ulm, Germany
                [19 ]APHM, Hopital de la Timone, CEMEREM, ( https://ror.org/05jrr4320) Marseille, France
                [20 ]Aix Marseille University, CNRS, CRMBM, ( https://ror.org/035xkbk20) Marseille, France
                [21 ]Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig, ( https://ror.org/03s7gtk40) Leipzig, Germany
                [22 ]GRID grid.411097.a, ISNI 0000 0000 8852 305X, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, , University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, ; Cologne, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7509-5268
                Article
                11910
                10.1007/s00415-023-11910-z
                10770020
                37676297
                b22ecb2a-f741-42b6-9469-aacc1b5379f4
                © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 3 May 2023
                : 27 July 2023
                : 27 July 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: Universitätsklinik München (6933)
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024

                Neurology
                neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (nmosd),attacks,disability,aquaporin-4 (aqp4),double-negative nmosd,immunotherapies,long-term management

                Comments

                Comment on this article