6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The impact of limb loading and the measurement modality (2D versus 3D) on the measurement of the limb loading dependent lower extremity parameters

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Deformity assessment and preoperative planning of realignment surgery are conventionally based on weight-bearing (WB) radiographs. However, newer technologies such as three-dimensional (3D) preoperative planning and surgical navigation with patient-specific instruments (PSI) rely on non-weight bearing (NWB) computed tomography (CT) data. Additionally, differences between conventional two-dimensional (2D) and 3D measurements are known. The goal of the present study was to systematically analyse the influence of WB and the measurement modality (2D versus 3D) on common WB-dependent measurements used for deformity assessment.

          Methods

          85 lower limbs could be included. Two readers measured the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and the joint line convergence angle (JLCA) in 2D WB and 2D NWB radiographs, as well as in CT-reconstructed 3D models using an already established 3D measurement method for HKA, and a newly developed 3D measurement method for JLCA, respectively. Interrater and intermodality reliability was assessed.

          Results

          Significant differences between WB and NWB measurements were found for HKA ( p < 0.001) and JLCA ( p < 0.001). No significant difference could be observed between 2D HKA NWB and 3D HKA ( p = 0.09). The difference between 2D JLCA NWB and 3D JLCA was significant ( p < 0.001). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the interrater agreement was almost perfect for all HKA and 3D JLCA measurements and substantial for 2D JLCA WB and 2D JLCA NWB. ICC for the intermodality agreement was almost perfect between 2D HKA WB and 2D HKA NWB as well as between 2D HKA NWB and 3D HKA, whereas it was moderate between 2D JLCA WB and 2D JLCA NWB and between 2D JLCA NWB and 3D JLCA.

          Conclusion

          Limb loading results in significant differences for both HKA and JLCA measurements. Furthermore, 2D projections were found to be insufficient to represent 3D joint anatomy in complex cases. With an increasing number of surgical approaches based on NWB CT-reconstructed models, research should focus on the development of 3D planning methods that consider the effects of WB on leg alignment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity.

          The axial alignment of the lower extremities of twenty-five normal male volunteers whose mean age was thirty years was studied using a standardized radiograph of the entire lower extremity. The extremities were found to be in a mean of 1.5 degrees (right) and 1.1 degrees (left) of varus angulation at the knee between the tibial and femoral mechanical axes. The transverse axis of the knee lacked a mean of 3.0 degrees (right) and 2.6 degrees (left) of being perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the tibia. The anatomical axis of the femur did not pass through the center of the knee.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Cluster analysis of multivariate data: efficiency versus interpretability of classifications

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Osteotomies around the knee: patient selection, stability of fixation and bone healing in high tibial osteotomies.

              New developments in osteotomy techniques and methods of fixation have caused a revival of interest of osteotomies around the knee. The current consensus on the indications, patient selection and the factors influencing the outcome after high tibial osteotomy is presented. This paper highlights recent research aimed at joint pressure redistribution, fixation stability and bone healing that has led to improved surgical techniques and a decrease of post-operative time to full weight-bearing.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                lukas.jud@balgrist.ch
                tabitha.roth@balgrist.ch
                philipp.fuernstahl@balgrist.ch
                lazaros.vlachopoulos@balgrist.ch
                reto.sutter@balgrist.ch
                sandro.fucentese@balgrist.ch
                Journal
                BMC Musculoskelet Disord
                BMC Musculoskelet Disord
                BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2474
                30 June 2020
                30 June 2020
                2020
                : 21
                : 418
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.7400.3, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0650, Department of Orthopedics, , Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, ; Forchstrasse 340, 8008 Zürich, Switzerland
                [2 ]GRID grid.5801.c, ISNI 0000 0001 2156 2780, Institute for Biomechanics, , ETH Zurich, ; Zurich, Switzerland
                [3 ]GRID grid.7400.3, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0650, Research in Orthopedic Computer Science (ROCS), , Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, ; Zurich, Switzerland
                [4 ]GRID grid.7400.3, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0650, Department of Radiology, , Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, ; Forchstrasse 340, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8128-3927
                Article
                3449
                10.1186/s12891-020-03449-1
                7329436
                32605616
                b21b6c30-36fd-4622-aa99-78c8d0f21873
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 25 March 2020
                : 23 June 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001711, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung;
                Award ID: 182352
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Orthopedics
                three-dimensional planning,navigation,corrective osteotomy,osteotomy,computer-assisted surgery,leg deformity

                Comments

                Comment on this article