41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Grape Berry Secondary Metabolites and Their Modulation by Abiotic Factors in a Climate Change Scenario–A Review

      systematic-review

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Temperature, water, solar radiation, and atmospheric CO 2 concentration are the main abiotic factors that are changing in the course of global warming. These abiotic factors govern the synthesis and degradation of primary (sugars, amino acids, organic acids, etc.) and secondary (phenolic and volatile flavor compounds and their precursors) metabolites directly, via the regulation of their biosynthetic pathways, or indirectly, via their effects on vine physiology and phenology. Several hundred secondary metabolites have been identified in the grape berry. Their biosynthesis and degradation have been characterized and have been shown to occur during different developmental stages of the berry. The understanding of how the different abiotic factors modulate secondary metabolism and thus berry quality is of crucial importance for breeders and growers to develop plant material and viticultural practices to maintain high-quality fruit and wine production in the context of global warming. Here, we review the main secondary metabolites of the grape berry, their biosynthesis, and how their accumulation and degradation is influenced by abiotic factors. The first part of the review provides an update on structure, biosynthesis, and degradation of phenolic compounds (flavonoids and non-flavonoids) and major aroma compounds (terpenes, thiols, methoxypyrazines, and C13 norisoprenoids). The second part gives an update on the influence of abiotic factors, such as water availability, temperature, radiation, and CO 2 concentration, on berry secondary metabolism. At the end of the paper, we raise some critical questions regarding intracluster berry heterogeneity and dilution effects and how the sampling strategy can impact the outcome of studies on the grapevine berry response to abiotic factors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references361

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2.

          Free-air CO(2) enrichment (FACE) experiments allow study of the effects of elevated [CO(2)] on plants and ecosystems grown under natural conditions without enclosure. Data from 120 primary, peer-reviewed articles describing physiology and production in the 12 large-scale FACE experiments (475-600 ppm) were collected and summarized using meta-analytic techniques. The results confirm some results from previous chamber experiments: light-saturated carbon uptake, diurnal C assimilation, growth and above-ground production increased, while specific leaf area and stomatal conductance decreased in elevated [CO(2)]. There were differences in FACE. Trees were more responsive than herbaceous species to elevated [CO(2)]. Grain crop yields increased far less than anticipated from prior enclosure studies. The broad direction of change in photosynthesis and production in elevated [CO(2)] may be similar in FACE and enclosure studies, but there are major quantitative differences: trees were more responsive than other functional types; C(4) species showed little response; and the reduction in plant nitrogen was small and largely accounted for by decreased Rubisco. The results from this review may provide the most plausible estimates of how plants in their native environments and field-grown crops will respond to rising atmospheric [CO(2)]; but even with FACE there are limitations, which are also discussed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Isoprene and monoterpene emission rate variability: Model evaluations and sensitivity analyses

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Retrotransposon-induced mutations in grape skin color.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Plant Sci
                Front Plant Sci
                Front. Plant Sci.
                Frontiers in Plant Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-462X
                22 March 2021
                2021
                : 12
                : 643258
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Changins College for Viticulture and Oenology, University of Sciences and Art Western Switzerland , Nyon, Switzerland
                [2] 2Unité de recherche Œnologie EA 4577, USC 1366 INRAE , Bordeaux, France
                [3] 3Institut des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin CS 50008 , Villenave d'Ornon, France
                [4] 4College of Science & Engineering, Flinders University , Bedford Park, SA, Australia
                [5] 5Agriculture and Food (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation) , Glen Osmond, SA, Australia
                [6] 6Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment, University of Padova Agripolis , Legnaro, Italy
                [7] 7Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari e Ambientali, Università degli Studi di Perugia , Perugia, Italy
                [8] 8Faculty of Land and Food Systems, Wine Research Centre, The University of British Columbia , Vancouver, BC, Canada
                Author notes

                Edited by: Flavia Guzzo, University of Verona, Italy

                Reviewed by: Zhanwu Dai, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China; Jun Wang, China Agricultural University, China; Inmaculada Pascual, University of Navarra, Spain

                *Correspondence: Markus Rienth markus.rienth@ 123456changins.ch

                This article was submitted to Plant Metabolism and Chemodiversity, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science

                Article
                10.3389/fpls.2021.643258
                8020818
                33828576
                b21769fd-20f0-4927-953f-4188b1eed7ed
                Copyright © 2021 Rienth, Vigneron, Darriet, Sweetman, Burbidge, Bonghi, Walker, Famiani and Castellarin.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 17 December 2020
                : 02 February 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 362, Pages: 26, Words: 24363
                Funding
                Funded by: Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 10.13039/501100001711
                Categories
                Plant Science
                Systematic Review

                Plant science & Botany
                grapevine berry,climate change,abiotic stress,secondary metabolism,phenolic compounds,aroma compounds,vitis vinifera

                Comments

                Comment on this article