31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Sex workers must not be forgotten in the COVID-19 response

      discussion

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          As countries maintain or adjust public health measures, emergency legislation, and economic policies in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, there is an urgent need to protect the rights of, and to support, the most vulnerable members of society. Sex workers are among the most marginalised groups. Globally, most direct sex work has largely ceased as a result of physical distancing and lockdown measures put in place to halt transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), potentially rendering a frequently marginalised and economically precarious population more vulnerable. 1 Most sex workers, even those who can move their work online, have been financially compromised and some are unable to stop in-person services. 2 It is imperative that sex workers are afforded access to social protection schemes as equal members of society. As with all aspects of health, the ability of sex workers to protect themselves against COVID-19 depends on their individual and interpersonal behaviours, their work environment, the availability of community support, access to health and social services, and broader aspects of the legal and economic environment.3, 4 Stigma and criminalisation mean that sex workers might not seek, or be eligible for, government-led social protection or economic initiatives to support small businesses. Police arrests, fines, violence, disruption in aid by law enforcement, and compulsory deportation have been reported by sex workers across diverse settings, fuelling concerns that the pandemic is intensifying stigma, discrimination, and repressive policing.1, 2 Sex workers who are homeless, use drugs, or are migrants with insecure legal or residency status face greater challenges in accessing health services or financial relief, which increases their vulnerability to poor health outcomes and longer-term negative economic impacts.5, 6 Increased prevalence of underlying health conditions among sex workers 7 might increase risk of COVID-19 progressing to severe illness. 8 Demand for shelter and supported housing has increased as sex work venues have been shut down or rental payments default through loss of income. 2 Existing mental health problems are likely to be exacerbated by anxiety over income, food, and housing, alongside concerns about infection from continuing to work in the absence of social protection. 9 Risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 is heightened for those who share drug paraphernalia for drug use. 10 Alternative ways of maintaining or extending treatment and drug substitute prescribing are important to save lives in places where services are closed or restricted or there are staff shortages due to sickness. 10 There is scarce reliable evidence of the risk of infection or complications of COVID-19 among people living with HIV, although the risk could be greater among those who are immunocompromised and not on HIV treatment. 11 Review evidence suggests, on average, use of antiretroviral therapies is already low among sex workers who are HIV positive in high-income and low-income settings. 12 It is crucial that disruption to health services does not further reduce access to HIV treatment and prevention or to vital services addressing domestic or other forms of violence.1, 2 Mathematical models suggest that even with widespread testing and contact tracing, in the absence of a COVID-19 vaccine, physical distancing will be a key intervention to prevent community transmission globally. 13 Early modelling that informed physical distancing policies did not account for the needs of vulnerable populations, or their access and adherence to official guidance. 14 Population-level gains, such as a reduction in hospital admissions and mortality, are likely to be intangible for marginalised populations for whom the immediate negative effects of physical distancing could be substantial. 15 The inability to work, reduced access to health services, and increased isolation are likely to result in poorer health outcomes and increased inequalities, particularly where individuals are largely excluded from formal social protection schemes. 16 Sex worker organisations have rapidly responded to COVID-19 by circulating hardship funds; helping with financial relief applications; advocating for governments to include sex workers in the pandemic response; calling for basic labour rights to facilitate safer working conditions; and providing health and safety guidance for those moving online or unable to stop direct services. 17 Worldwide, government initiatives have included supplying food packages to sex workers in Bangladesh, the provision of emergency housing in England and Wales, and the inclusion of sex workers in financial benefits in Thailand, the Netherlands, and Japan. Yet these schemes often exclude the most marginalised, including those who are homeless, transgender, or migrants.1, 2 There is a critical need for governments and health and social care providers to work with affected communities and front-line service providers to co-produce effective interventions. 18 Examples of necessary interventions are described in the panel . Existing sex worker organisations provide an essential foundation for community health work and in collaboration with health services they can facilitate, and ensure the appropriateness of, community testing and contact tracing as well as maximising the uptake of potential future COVID-19 vaccines or treatments. 19 Panel Key interventions to address harms of COVID-19 among sex workers All interventions and services must be designed and implemented in collaboration with sex-worker-led organisations. Social and structural interventions • Financial benefits and social protection for all sex workers including migrants with illegal or uncertain residency status • Immediate cessation of arrests, raids, and prosecutions for sex work and minor drug-related offences, and long-term reform of policies and laws that have been shown to be harmful to health • Provision of emergency housing to those who are homeless, moratorium on evictions, and assistance with rent or mortgage repayments for those in need Health services • Appropriately targeted health promotion advice on prevention of COVID-19 with language translation • Distribution of hand sanitiser, soap, condoms, and personal protective equipment • Maintenance and extension of person-centred services to address needs associated with mental health, alcohol and other drug use, physical and sexual violence, and sexual and reproductive health, including HIV treatment and transition-related care • COVID-19 testing and contact tracing among sex workers and marginalised groups Achieving healthier communities and controlling COVID-19 requires a collective and inclusive response. Resources and support for sex workers need to be prioritised. Involvement of communities in social protection schemes, health services, and information will enable sex workers to protect their health during this pandemic as equal citizens, in line with principles of social justice. 20 Reforms of social and legal policies, including decriminalisation of sex work, can reduce discrimination and marginalisation of sex workers and enable provision of vital health and social services. 3 This need becomes more acute as existing health and social challenges are exacerbated by the COVID-19 crisis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Refugee and migrant health in the COVID-19 response

          In a continued effort to curb the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), countries have been tightening borders and putting travel restrictions in place. These actions have affected refugees and migrants worldwide. The International Organization for Migration and UNHCR announced on March 10, 2020, that resettlement travel for refugees will be temporarily suspended, although the agencies have appealed to states to ensure emergency cases are exempted. 1 The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted some countries to take steps towards further reducing population movement that affects humanitarian corridors around the world. At the same time, there could be cases of refoulement with asylum seekers being returned to their countries of origin, where they are at risk of persecution and in an apparent breach of international law. As of March 29, 2020, WHO reported 146 countries and territories with cases of COVID-19 from local transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, many of which have large refugee populations. 2 Search and rescue operations in the central Mediterranean, where more than 16 000 migrants have died since 2015, 3 have been suspended due to logistical difficulties caused by COVID-19. The few search and rescue operations conducted before the COVID-19 nationwide lockdowns led to the immediate quarantine of migrants in reception centres. These measures were taken even though there was no confirmed case of COVID-19 in Africa at that time. In fact, some refugees and migrants are travelling from countries not yet substantially affected by COVID-19 and entering countries with increasing numbers of COVID-19 cases. Measures to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic are a focus of communities in countries, but preparedness plans should consider refugees and migrants and their needs. Evidence shows that this vulnerable population has a low risk of transmitting communicable diseases to host populations in general. 4 However, refugees and migrants are potentially at increased risk of contracting diseases, including COVID-19, because they typically live in overcrowded conditions without access to basic sanitation. The ability to access health-care services in humanitarian settings is usually compromised and exacerbated by shortages of medicines and lack of health-care facilities. Moreover, refugees typically face administrative, financial, legal, and language barriers to access the health system. 4 Conditions in refugee camps are concerning. Many people who have been affected by humanitarian crises live in camps or camp-like settings in host countries. These camps usually provide inadequate and overcrowded living arrangements that present a severe health risk to inhabitants and host populations. The absence of basic amenities, such as clean running water and soap, insufficient medical personnel presence, and poor access to adequate health information are major problems in these settings. Basic public health measures, such as social distancing, proper hand hygiene, and self-isolation are thus not possible or extremely difficult to implement in refugee camps. If no immediate measures to improve conditions are put in place, the concern about an outbreak of COVID-19 in the camps cannot be overstated. Site-specific epidemiological risk assessments must be done to determine the extent of the risk of COVID-19 introduction and transmission in such settlements, together with case management protocols and rapid deployment of outbreak response teams if needed. Migrants and refugees are particularly vulnerable to the impact of COVID-19 in the wider community. They are over-represented among the homeless population in most member states—a growing trend in EU-15 and border and transit countries. 5 Living conditions for homeless refugees and migrants can undermine the ability to follow public health advice, including basic hygiene measures, quarantine, or self-isolation, because many people are in close contact and gather in large groups. Furthermore, international migrant workers and refugees can be affected by income loss, health-care insecurity, and the ramifications that come with postponement of decisions on their legal status or reduction of employment, legal, and administrative services. There is also scarce culturally and linguistically accessible information about COVID-19 and how to protect oneself and others, which further increases risks to refugees and migrants as well as host populations. © 2020 Alkis Konstantinidis/Reuters 2020 Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. Additionally, states of emergency and lockdowns to deal with the pandemic have affected refugee and migrant volunteer community service provision for this population group. An inclusive approach to refugee and migrant health that leaves no one behind during the COVID-19 pandemic should guide our public health efforts. As governments tighten border controls and implement other measures in response to COVID-19, they need to consider the impacts on refugees and migrants and ensure that such actions do not prevent people from accessing safety, health-care services, and information. There must be no forced returns and refoulement justified by or based on fears or suspicion of COVID-19 transmission, especially because there is estimated to be low risk of transmitting communicable disease from refugee and migrant populations to host populations in the WHO European region. 4 Yet migrants and refugees are often stigmatised and unjustly discriminated against for spreading disease and such unacceptable attitudes further risk wider public health outcomes, including for host populations, since refugees and migrants could be fearful to seek treatment or disclose symptoms. 6 Refugees and migrants must be included in national public health systems, with no risk of financial or legal consequences for them. This approach is of the utmost importance, as there can be no public health without refugee and migrant health.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Special report: The simulations driving the world’s response to COVID-19

            David Adam (2020)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Associations between sex work laws and sex workers’ health: A systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative and qualitative studies

              Background Sex workers are at disproportionate risk of violence and sexual and emotional ill health, harms that have been linked to the criminalisation of sex work. We synthesised evidence on the extent to which sex work laws and policing practices affect sex workers’ safety, health, and access to services, and the pathways through which these effects occur. Methods and findings We searched bibliographic databases between 1 January 1990 and 9 May 2018 for qualitative and quantitative research involving sex workers of all genders and terms relating to legislation, police, and health. We operationalised categories of lawful and unlawful police repression of sex workers or their clients, including criminal and administrative penalties. We included quantitative studies that measured associations between policing and outcomes of violence, health, and access to services, and qualitative studies that explored related pathways. We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the average effect of experiencing sexual/physical violence, HIV or sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and condomless sex, among individuals exposed to repressive policing compared to those unexposed. Qualitative studies were synthesised iteratively, inductively, and thematically. We reviewed 40 quantitative and 94 qualitative studies. Repressive policing of sex workers was associated with increased risk of sexual/physical violence from clients or other parties (odds ratio [OR] 2.99, 95% CI 1.96–4.57), HIV/STI (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.60–2.19), and condomless sex (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.03–1.94). The qualitative synthesis identified diverse forms of police violence and abuses of power, including arbitrary arrest, bribery and extortion, physical and sexual violence, failure to provide access to justice, and forced HIV testing. It showed that in contexts of criminalisation, the threat and enactment of police harassment and arrest of sex workers or their clients displaced sex workers into isolated work locations, disrupting peer support networks and service access, and limiting risk reduction opportunities. It discouraged sex workers from carrying condoms and exacerbated existing inequalities experienced by transgender, migrant, and drug-using sex workers. Evidence from decriminalised settings suggests that sex workers in these settings have greater negotiating power with clients and better access to justice. Quantitative findings were limited by high heterogeneity in the meta-analysis for some outcomes and insufficient data to conduct meta-analyses for others, as well as variable sample size and study quality. Few studies reported whether arrest was related to sex work or another offence, limiting our ability to assess the associations between sex work criminalisation and outcomes relative to other penalties or abuses of police power, and all studies were observational, prohibiting any causal inference. Few studies included trans- and cisgender male sex workers, and little evidence related to emotional health and access to healthcare beyond HIV/STI testing. Conclusions Together, the qualitative and quantitative evidence demonstrate the extensive harms associated with criminalisation of sex work, including laws and enforcement targeting the sale and purchase of sex, and activities relating to sex work organisation. There is an urgent need to reform sex-work-related laws and institutional practices so as to reduce harms and barriers to the realisation of health.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Lancet
                Lancet
                Lancet (London, England)
                Elsevier Ltd.
                0140-6736
                1474-547X
                15 May 2020
                15 May 2020
                Affiliations
                [a ]Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK
                [b ]International Committee on the Rights of Sex Workers in Europe, Brussels, Belgium
                [c ]Department of Social Sciences, University of Roehampton, Roehampton, UK
                [d ]Transform Drug Policy Foundation, Bristol, UK
                [e ]School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
                Article
                S0140-6736(20)31033-3
                10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31033-3
                7228722
                32422122
                b1aa2975-8ede-41d5-ae2e-b0edde8cd8aa
                © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article