0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Asymmetric Thickness Intracorneal Ring Segments for Keratoconus

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To describe the anatomical and functional results of the implantation of asymmetric thickness intracorneal ring segments (AS-ICRS) in eyes with keratoconus and asymmetric/irregular astigmatism (type 2 – Duck – and type 3 – Snowman – phenotypes, Fernandez-Vega/Alfonso morphologic Keratoconus classification).

          Materials and Methods

          Retrospective observational study including 19 consecutive patients (21 eyes) with keratoconus who underwent manual implantation of the Keraring ® Asymmetric ICRS (AS). Analysis included demographic and clinical data and Pentacam (Oculus ®) measurements: topographic astigmatism; topographic flat meridian (K1), steepest meridian (K2) and the maximum keratometric point (Kmax); total root mean square (RMS) and high order RMS (HOA) aberrations and comatic Zernike coefficients (Z3 1;Z3 −1) at 0º and 90º meridians.

          Results

          Overall mean age was 35.3±11.7 years and median follow-up was 7.1 months (range 6–12). At the end of follow-up, a significant improvement from baseline was achieved in both UDVA (0.24±0.22; p=0.017) and CDVA (0.21±0.17; p<0.001). Regarding topographic measurements, the greatest decrease was observed in K2 (2.76±1.9D; p<0.001) and astigmatism (1.97±1.5; p<0.001). Aberrometry analysis showed a reduction of 1.27±3.2µm in the total RMS (p=0.085), 0.24±0.9µm in HOA (p=0.227) and 0.78±0.5 (p<0.001) in the 90º component of comatic aberration. The procedure effects in the CDVA, topographic and aberrometric parameters were higher in type 2 cones without statistical significance (p>0.05 in all).

          Conclusion

          Implantation of the Keraring ® Asymmetric ICRS in keratoconus with asymmetric/irregular astigmatism allowed an improvement of several clinical, topographic and aberrometric parameters, with clinical efficacy and safety, with a tendency to a greater effect in the type 2 cones.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Keratoconus: The ABCD Grading System

          To propose a new keratoconus classification/staging system that utilises current tomographic data and better reflects the anatomical and functional changes seen in keratoconus.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Intracorneal ring segments in ectatic corneal disease - a review.

            The purpose of this review is to collect and summarize all the scientific literature regarding the use of intracorneal ring segments (ICRS) in corneal ectatic disease. These implants, initially designed to correct myopia in normal eyes, are implanted in the deep corneal stroma with the aim of achieving modifications to the corneal curvature and subsequently refractive adjustments. Colin et al. in 2000 were the first to report the efficacy of these implants in reducing the refractive error and corneal steepening in keratoconus eyes. Two main types of ICRS have been developed and used for the treatment of ectatic corneal disease, different in profile and diameter of implantation: Intacs and Ferrara rings. Successful outcomes have been reported by several authors with these implants in keratoconic eyes using different nomograms. Besides keratoconus, ICRS have been also used successfully for the management of pellucid marginal degeneration and post-laser in situ keratomileusis corneal ectasia. The implantation procedure may be performed today by two surgical techniques to create the corneal channels where implants are inserted: mechanical dissection using a manual semicircular dissector (mechanical-assisted) and photodisruption of lamellar tissue using the femtosecond laser technology (femtosecond-assisted). With both techniques, visual, refractive and topographic improvements have been observed, although higher incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications have been reported with the mechanical procedure according to the evidence found in the peer-reviewed literature. ICRS technology is a promising therapeutic option in corneal ectatic disease, avoiding corneal graft and allowing a visual and refractive rehabilitation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation by femtosecond laser for keratoconus correction.

              To report the outcomes after the implantation of intrastromal corneal ring segments (KERARING) aided by femtosecond laser for the correction of keratoconus. Prospective consecutive interventional study. Twenty-one eyes of 16 consecutive keratoconic patients with mean age 32+/-10.2 years. Forty-five percent were keratoconus grade I, 20% grade II, 15% grade III, and 20% grade IV. Intrastromal corneal ring segments KERARING were implanted for keratoconus correction after corneal tunnel creation with the aid of femtosecond laser (IntraLase Corp, Irvine CA). Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refractive outcome, complete ophthalmologic examination, videokeratography, and corneal higher order aberrations (HOA) were determined or performed before and after surgery at 1 day, 1 week, and 3 and 6 months. In addition, operative and postoperative complications were recorded. KERARING implantation significantly increased UCVA from 0.06 to 0.3 (P or =3.0 microm) showed significant (P 3.0 microm.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Ophthalmol
                Clin Ophthalmol
                opth
                clinop
                Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
                Dove
                1177-5467
                1177-5483
                16 December 2020
                2020
                : 14
                : 4415-4421
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Ophthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Do Porto , Porto, Portugal
                [2 ]Instituto De Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar , Porto, Portugal
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Pedro Manuel Baptista Centro Hospitalar Universitário Do Porto, Largo Prof. Abel Salazar , Porto4099-001, PortugalTel +0035-1917868372 Email pedroyybaptista@gmail.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8285-1084
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6487-7950
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3080-6035
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2198-7444
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7532-5991
                Article
                283387
                10.2147/OPTH.S283387
                7751710
                33364746
                b1831c79-aaf3-40c5-8fe1-d8086d943485
                © 2020 Baptista et al.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 22 September 2020
                : 12 November 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 6, References: 17, Pages: 7
                Categories
                Original Research

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                aberrometry,asymmetric,astigmatism,icrs,keratoconus
                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                aberrometry, asymmetric, astigmatism, icrs, keratoconus

                Comments

                Comment on this article