7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Extensive aortic surgery in acute aortic dissection type A on outcome – insights from 25 years single center experience

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          This single center study compares the different surgical techniques used in the treatment of acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) analyzing the influence of the extent of the surgical approach on outcome.

          Methods

          From 1988 to 2012, 407 patients were operated for AADA. The cohort was divided into subgroups according to the surgical approach. These groups were compared with the supracommissural replacement group (SCR; n = 141). Groups included aortic valve sparing techniques (AVS; n = 29), Composite replacement (COMP; n = 119), COMP with total arch replacement (COMP+TAR; n = 27) and SCR with TAR ( n = 75).

          Results

          Compared to SCR alone, operation ( p = 0.005), bypass-, cross-clamp and circulatory arrest times were longer in SCR + TAR (all p < 0.001). Moreover, operation, bypass and cross clamp times were longer in COMP+TAR ( p = 0.003, p = 0.002 and p < 0.001 respectively). COMP alone and AVS required longer cross-clamp time, too ( p < 0,001 and p = 0.002, respectively). Overall 30-day mortality was 21% with the observed lowest rate after AVS (14%, SCR 18%, COMP 25%) but differences in 30-day mortality were not statistically significant. The estimated 10-year survival was 42%, especially AVS demonstrated a good 10-year survival (69%). David technique was superior to Yacoub technique concerning incidence of redo interventions ( p = 0.036). Risk factors for early mortality included age, circulatory arrest, general malperfusion, bypass and operation time. Circulatory arrest per se was revealed as risk factor for long-term survival.

          Conclusions

          Within our single center retrospective study concomitant aortic root repair or aortic arch replacement for AADA demonstrated acceptable early and long-term survival. Circulatory arrest, long bypass and operation times per se might be important risk factors for early mortality. AVS techniques can be performed safely and have good outcomes in acute aortic dissection repair.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease.

          Acute aortic dissection is a life-threatening medical emergency associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Data are limited regarding the effect of recent imaging and therapeutic advances on patient care and outcomes in this setting. To assess the presentation, management, and outcomes of acute aortic dissection. Case series with patients enrolled between January 1996 and December 1998. Data were collected at presentation and by physician review of hospital records. The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection, consisting of 12 international referral centers. A total of 464 patients (mean age, 63 years; 65.3% male), 62.3% of whom had type A dissection. Presenting history, physical findings, management, and mortality, as assessed by history and physician review of hospital records. While sudden onset of severe sharp pain was the single most common presenting complaint, the clinical presentation was diverse. Classic physical findings such as aortic regurgitation and pulse deficit were noted in only 31.6% and 15.1% of patients, respectively, and initial chest radiograph and electrocardiogram were frequently not helpful (no abnormalities were noted in 12.4% and 31.3% of patients, respectively). Computed tomography was the initial imaging modality used in 61.1%. Overall in-hospital mortality was 27.4%. Mortality of patients with type A dissection managed surgically was 26%; among those not receiving surgery (typically because of advanced age and comorbidity), mortality was 58%. Mortality of patients with type B dissection treated medically was 10.7%. Surgery was performed in 20% of patients with type B dissection; mortality in this group was 31.4%. Acute aortic dissection presents with a wide range of manifestations, and classic findings are often absent. A high clinical index of suspicion is necessary. Despite recent advances, in-hospital mortality rates remain high. Our data support the need for continued improvement in prevention, diagnosis, and management of acute aortic dissection.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Mortality in patients with acute aortic dissection type A: analysis of pre- and intraoperative risk factors from the German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A (GERAADA).

            Acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) is an emergency with excessive mortality if surgery is delayed. Knowledge about independent predictors of mortality on surgically treated AADA patients is scarce. Therefore, this study was conducted to identify pre- and intraoperative risk factors for death.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Current status and recommendations for use of the frozen elephant trunk technique: a position paper by the Vascular Domain of EACTS

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +35226255071 , Kallenbach.Klaus@incci.lu
                Journal
                J Cardiothorac Surg
                J Cardiothorac Surg
                Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
                BioMed Central (London )
                1749-8090
                6 November 2019
                6 November 2019
                2019
                : 14
                : 187
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0328 4908, GRID grid.5253.1, Department of Cardiac Surgery, , University Hospital Heidelberg, ; Heidelberg, Germany
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0578 8220, GRID grid.411088.4, Department of Medicine, Cardiology, , Goethe University Hospital, ; Frankfurt, Germany
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1009 3608, GRID grid.5560.6, Department of Cardiac Surgery, , European Medical School Oldenburg-Groningen, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, ; Oldenburg, Germany
                [4 ]Department of Cardiac Surgery, INCCI HaerzZenter, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
                Article
                1007
                10.1186/s13019-019-1007-7
                6836454
                31694667
                b163fe5c-867f-4ab1-abeb-3a86e89b400c
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 25 June 2019
                : 20 September 2019
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Surgery
                aortic dissection,aortic valve sparing,david technique,aortic arch replacement
                Surgery
                aortic dissection, aortic valve sparing, david technique, aortic arch replacement

                Comments

                Comment on this article