7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Management of Postoperative Pain after Elective Craniotomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of a Neurosurgical Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Program

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective: To prospectively evaluate the efficacy of a neurosurgical enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on the management of postoperative pain after elective craniotomies.

          Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in the neurosurgical center of Tangdu Hospital (Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China). A total of 129 patients undergoing craniotomies between October 2016 and July 2017 were enrolled in a randomized clinical trial comparing an ERAS protocol to a conventional postoperative care regimen. The primary outcome was the postoperative pain score assessed by a verbal numerical rating scale (NRS).

          Results: Patients in the ERAS group had a significant reduction in their postoperative pain scores on POD 1 compared to patients in the control group (p < 0.05). More patients (n = 44, 68.8%) in the ERAS group experienced mild pain (NRS: 1 to 3) on POD1 compared with patients (n = 23, 35.4%) in the control group (p < 0.05). A further reduction in pain scores was also observed on POD 2 and maintained on POD 3 in the ERAS group compared with that in the control group. In addition, the median postoperative length of hospital stay was significantly decreased with the incorporation of the ERAS protocol compared to controls (ERAS: 4 days, control: 7 days, P<0.001).

          Conclusion: The implementation of a neurosurgical ERAS protocol for elective craniotomy patients has significant benefits in alleviating postoperative pain and enhancing recovery leading to early discharge after surgery compared to conventional care. Further evaluation of this protocol in larger, multi-center studies is warranted.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome.

          To evaluate the effect of modifying perioperative care in noncardiac surgical patients on morbidity, mortality, and other outcome measures. New approaches in pain control, introduction of techniques that reduce the perioperative stress response, and the more frequent use of minimal invasive surgical access have been introduced over the past decade. The impact of these interventions, either alone or in combination, on perioperative outcome was evaluated. We searched Medline for the period of 1980 to the present using the key terms fast track surgery, accelerated care programs, postoperative complications and preoperative patient preparation; and we examined and discussed the articles that were identified to include in this review. This information was supplemented with our own research on the mediators of the stress response in surgical patients, the use of epidural anesthesia in elective operations, and pilot studies of fast track surgical procedures using the multimodality approach. The introduction of newer approaches to perioperative care has reduced both morbidity and mortality in surgical patients. In the future, most elective operations will become day surgical procedures or require only 1 to 2 days of postoperative hospitalization. Reorganization of the perioperative team (anesthesiologists, surgeons, nurses, and physical therapists) will be essential to achieve successful fast track surgical programs. Understanding perioperative pathophysiology and implementation of care regimes to reduce the stress of an operation, will continue to accelerate rehabilitation associated with decreased hospitalization and increased satisfaction and safety after discharge. Developments and improvements of multimodal interventions within the context of "fast track" surgery programs represents the major challenge for the medical professionals working to achieve a "pain and risk free" perioperative course.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The administration of an oral carbohydrate-containing fluid prior to major elective upper-gastrointestinal surgery preserves skeletal muscle mass postoperatively--a randomised clinical trial.

            Recent evidence suggests that the provision of energy-containing fluids is safe and may impact positively on markers of recovery. The aims of this study were to assess the tolerance of preoperative carbohydrate fluid administration and to determine its effect on postoperative metabolic and clinical responses. Patients admitted to the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh for major, elective abdominal surgery were recruited to this double-blind, randomised study and received either a placebo drink or carbohydrate (12.6g/100ml) drink (CHOD). Patients consumed 800 ml of their drink on the evening before surgery and 400 ml on the day of surgery 2-3 h before the induction of anaesthesia. Nutritional status was determined using body mass index (BMI) and upper arm anthropometry; all measurements were taken preoperatively, postoperatively and at discharge. Blood glucose and insulin concentrations were also measured preoperatively and on the first post operative day. Length of hospital stay (LOS) and postoperative complications were recorded. Seventy-two patients were recruited and 65 (34 male:31 female) completed this study. Thirty-four patients were randomised to receive the placebo drink (control group) and 31 patients to receive the carbohydrate drink (CHOD group). Groups were well-matched in terms of gender and age. There were no differences between the two groups at baseline for BMI (control: -25.1+/-1.7 kg/m2; CHOD -25.2+/-1.2 kg/m2), upper arm anthropometry or surgical procedure. At discharge loss of muscle mass (arm muscle circumference) was significantly greater in the control group when compared with the CHOD group (control: -1.1+/-0.15 cm; CHOD: -0.5+/-0.16 cm; P<0.05). Baseline insulin (control: 20.7+/-4.9 mU/l; CHOD: 24.6+/-6.2 mU/l) and glucose (control: 6.0+/-1.4 mmol/l; CHOD 5.7+/-1.4 mmol/l) were comparable in the two groups and did not differ postoperatively. No complications were recorded as a result of preoperative fluid consumption. Postoperative morbidity occurred in six patients from each group. Median LOS in the control group was 10 days (IQR=6), and 8 days (IQR=4) in the CHOD group. Preoperative consumption of carbohydrate-containing fluids is safe. Provision of a carbohydrate energy source prior to surgery may attenuate depletion of muscle mass after surgery. Further studies are required to determine if this preservation of muscle mass is reflected in improved function and reduced rehabilitation time.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Intraoperative epidural analgesia combined with ketamine provides effective preventive analgesia in patients undergoing major digestive surgery.

              As a broader definition of preemptive analgesia, preventive analgesia aims to prevent the sensitization of central nervous system, hence the development of pathologic pain after tissular injury. To demonstrate benefits from preventive treatment, objective measurement of postoperative pain such as wound hyperalgesia and persistent pain should be evaluated. The current study assessed the role and timing of epidural analgesia in this context. In a randomized, double-blinded trial, 85 patients scheduled to undergo neoplastic colonic resection were included. All the patients received a thoracic epidural catheter, systemic ketamine at a antihyperalgesic dose, and general anesthesia. Continuous infusion of analgesics belonging to the same class was administered by either intravenous or epidural route before incision until 72 h after surgery. Patients were allocated to four groups to receive intraoperative intravenous lidocaine-sufentanil-clonidine or epidural bupivacaine-sufentanil-clonidine followed postoperatively by either intravenous (lidocaine-morphine-clonidine) or epidural (bupivacaine-sufentanil-clonidine) patient-controlled analgesia. Postoperative pain scores (visual analog scale), analgesic consumption, wound area of punctuate hyperalgesia, residual pain, and analgesics needed from 2 weeks until 12 months were recorded. Analgesic requirements, visual analog scale scores, and area of hyperalgesia were significantly higher in the intravenous treatment group (intravenous-intravenous), and more patients reported residual pain from 2 weeks until 1 yr (28%). Although postoperative pain measurements did not differ, postoperative epidural treatment (intravenous-epidural) was less effective to prevent residual pain at 1 yr (11%; P = 0.2 with intravenous-intravenous group) than intraoperative one (epidural-epidural and epidural-intravenous groups) (0%; P = 0.01 with intravenous-intravenous group). Combined with an antihyperalgesic dose of ketamine, intraoperative epidural analgesia provides effective preventive analgesia after major digestive surgery.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Med Sci
                Int J Med Sci
                ijms
                International Journal of Medical Sciences
                Ivyspring International Publisher (Sydney )
                1449-1907
                2020
                21 June 2020
                : 17
                : 11
                : 1541-1549
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University. Xi'an, China.
                [2 ]Department of Neurosurgery, Xi'an International Medical Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
                [3 ]Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University. Xi'an, China.
                [4 ]Department of Anesthesiology, Xi'an International Medical Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
                [5 ]Department of Anesthesiology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University. Xi'an, China.
                [6 ]Department of Nutrition, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University. Xi'an, China.
                [7 ]Duke University Hospital. Durham, NC. USA.
                Author notes
                ✉ Corresponding authors: Shiming He, MD., PhD. [E-mail: hshimin@ 123456fmmu.edu.cn ], Fax & Tel. +86 29 68302889; Yuan Wang, MD., PhD. [Email: bladerunnerwang@ 123456gmail.com ], Fax & Tel. +86 29 84717737.

                *These authors contributed equally in this study.

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

                Article
                ijmsv17p1541
                10.7150/ijms.46403
                7359387
                32669957
                b159fade-5f4d-4672-a5f8-0d350c44666d
                © The author(s)

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.

                History
                : 27 March 2020
                : 9 June 2020
                Categories
                Research Paper

                Medicine
                enhanced recovery after surgery (eras),neurosurgery,elective craniotomy,pain management,outcomes

                Comments

                Comment on this article