26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Light and Cognition: Roles for Circadian Rhythms, Sleep, and Arousal

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Light exerts a wide range of effects on mammalian physiology and behavior. As well as synchronizing circadian rhythms to the external environment, light has been shown to modulate autonomic and neuroendocrine responses as well as regulating sleep and influencing cognitive processes such as attention, arousal, and performance. The last two decades have seen major advances in our understanding of the retinal photoreceptors that mediate these non-image forming responses to light, as well as the neural pathways and molecular mechanisms by which circadian rhythms are generated and entrained to the external light/dark (LD) cycle. By contrast, our understanding of the mechanisms by which lighting influences cognitive processes is more equivocal. The effects of light on different cognitive processes are complex. As well as the direct effects of light on alertness, indirect effects may also occur due to disrupted circadian entrainment. Despite the widespread use of disrupted LD cycles to study the role circadian rhythms on cognition, the different experimental protocols used have subtly different effects on circadian function which are not always comparable. Moreover, these protocols will also disrupt sleep and alter physiological arousal, both of which are known to modulate cognition. Studies have used different assays that are dependent on different cognitive and sensory processes, which may also contribute to their variable findings. Here, we propose that studies addressing the effects of different lighting conditions on cognitive processes must also account for their effects on circadian rhythms, sleep, and arousal if we are to fully understand the physiological basis of these responses.

          Related collections

          Most cited references187

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Sleep and the price of plasticity: from synaptic and cellular homeostasis to memory consolidation and integration.

          Sleep is universal, tightly regulated, and its loss impairs cognition. But why does the brain need to disconnect from the environment for hours every day? The synaptic homeostasis hypothesis (SHY) proposes that sleep is the price the brain pays for plasticity. During a waking episode, learning statistical regularities about the current environment requires strengthening connections throughout the brain. This increases cellular needs for energy and supplies, decreases signal-to-noise ratios, and saturates learning. During sleep, spontaneous activity renormalizes net synaptic strength and restores cellular homeostasis. Activity-dependent down-selection of synapses can also explain the benefits of sleep on memory acquisition, consolidation, and integration. This happens through the offline, comprehensive sampling of statistical regularities incorporated in neuronal circuits over a lifetime. This Perspective considers the rationale and evidence for SHY and points to open issues related to sleep and plasticity. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The orphan nuclear receptor REV-ERBalpha controls circadian transcription within the positive limb of the mammalian circadian oscillator.

            Mammalian circadian rhythms are generated by a feedback loop in which BMAL1 and CLOCK, players of the positive limb, activate transcription of the cryptochrome and period genes, components of the negative limb. Bmal1 and Per transcription cycles display nearly opposite phases and are thus governed by different mechanisms. Here, we identify the orphan nuclear receptor REV-ERBalpha as the major regulator of cyclic Bmal1 transcription. Circadian Rev-erbalpha expression is controlled by components of the general feedback loop. Thus, REV-ERBalpha constitutes a molecular link through which components of the negative limb drive antiphasic expression of components of the positive limb. While REV-ERBalpha influences the period length and affects the phase-shifting properties of the clock, it is not required for circadian rhythm generation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Loss of a circadian adrenal corticosterone rhythm following suprachiasmatic lesions in the rat.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : http://frontiersin.org/people/u/483242
                URI : http://frontiersin.org/people/u/483257
                URI : http://frontiersin.org/people/u/177326
                URI : http://frontiersin.org/people/u/314835
                URI : http://frontiersin.org/people/u/480599
                Journal
                Front Neurol
                Front Neurol
                Front. Neurol.
                Frontiers in Neurology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-2295
                09 February 2018
                2018
                : 9
                : 56
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Sleep and Circadian Neuroscience Institute (SCNi), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford , Oxford, United Kingdom
                [2] 2Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford , Oxford, United Kingdom
                [3] 3Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford , Oxford, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Edited by: Monica M. C. Gonzalez, Ferrero Institute of Neurology and Sleep (IFN), Argentina

                Reviewed by: Martin Desseilles, University of Namur, Belgium; Simone Sarasso, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy

                *Correspondence: Stuart N. Peirson, stuart.peirson@ 123456eye.ox.ac.uk

                Specialty section: This article was submitted to Sleep and Chronobiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neurology

                Article
                10.3389/fneur.2018.00056
                5811463
                29479335
                b152b8c8-84c1-40b7-8673-a1f4f9cc995e
                Copyright © 2018 Fisk, Tam, Brown, Vyazovskiy, Bannerman and Peirson.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 30 September 2017
                : 22 January 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 231, Pages: 18, Words: 16680
                Funding
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust 10.13039/100004440
                Award ID: 098461/Z/12/Z
                Funded by: Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council 10.13039/501100000268
                Award ID: BB/I021086/1
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Review

                Neurology
                learning and memory,alertness,circadian disruption,sleep disruption,melanopsin
                Neurology
                learning and memory, alertness, circadian disruption, sleep disruption, melanopsin

                Comments

                Comment on this article