3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Development and testing of a remote hybrid SMS/web-based perioperative messenger: A mixed-methods study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Perioperative messengers as tools for hospitals to communicate with patients’ loved ones during surgery have been described in form of pagers, SMS, email, and apps. The approach of combining multiple means of communication to create a secure and reliable messenger promises several advantages and has not been investigated to date.

          Objective

          The aim was to develop and test the technical feasibility and acceptance of a remote hybrid SMS/web-based perioperative messenger that keeps patients’ loved ones informed around the time of surgery.

          Methods

          Three focus groups were held with six physicians, five nurses, and 11 members of the Austrian Patient Council separately to understand their concerns and needs regarding the perioperative messenger. Their input was used to develop the perioperative messenger. Twenty-five patients and their selected loved one tested the messenger in a feasibility study. Data were collected between September 2021 and August 2023.

          Results

          Focus groups indicated that the most important characteristics of a messenger were transparent and prompt communication, ease-of-use, data security, and no additional workload for healthcare professionals. Our developed perioperative messenger uses SMS notifications to link to new information on a secure web platform. Participating patients were aged between 18 and 78, their loved ones between 18 and 71. Thirteen patients and 15 loved ones were female. A total of 173 messages regarding the 25 surgeries were sent, 99% of which were read on a mobile device. The median time between sending and reading surgery-related messages was 63s. All loved ones were either “fairly satisfied” or “very satisfied”.

          Conclusion

          The idea of a perioperative messenger was received positively by physicians, nurses, and members of the Austrian Patient Council. The developed SMS/web-based hybrid messenger system for receiving perioperative updates was shown to be feasible, and of interest and satisfaction to the loved ones.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Patient engagement and the design of digital health.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2-21-2030: Toward Eliminating Avoidable Harm in Health Care

              (2021)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Digit Health
                Digit Health
                DHJ
                spdhj
                Digital Health
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                2055-2076
                15 December 2024
                Jan-Dec 2024
                : 10
                : 20552076241288760
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Ringgold 610731, universityLudwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety; , Vienna, Austria
                [2 ]Ringgold 27271, universityMedical University of Vienna; , Vienna, Austria
                [3 ]Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Ringgold 31591, universityMedical University of Vienna; , Vienna, Austria
                Author notes
                [*]Mojca Hriberšek, Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Währinger Straße 104/10, 1180 Wien, Österreich. Email: mojca.hribersek@ 123456dhps.lbg.ac.at
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8200-1968
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4059-9647
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7755-4445
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3543-9342
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6850-6532
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0450-6132
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7571-8680
                Article
                10.1177_20552076241288760
                10.1177/20552076241288760
                11648015
                39687524
                b1321481-88dd-44ae-86cd-5336ca3fa215
                © The Author(s) 2024

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 29 May 2024
                : 16 September 2024
                Categories
                Original Research Article
                Custom metadata
                ts19
                January-December 2024

                digital health,perioperative care,quality of care,health service,patient involvement,patient satisfaction,health communication,family-centered care

                Comments

                Comment on this article