10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Career beasts and how to cope with them: From toxic workplace culture to healthy competition

      news

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Hierarchy, high‐end competitions, self‐sacrifice that start from medical school and continue throughout the entire medical career and traditional teaching methods have led the way for bullying in Medicine (Figure 1). However, in this particular case, the victims are not weak persons, but promising and skilful achievers. Academic recognition is difficult to obtain; therefore, some might opt for shortcuts such as mistreating their co‐workers. Even more so, indoctrinating doctors‐in‐training into an old and abusive teaching system was until recently ‘the hidden curriculum’ in medical education. 1 , 2 Raising awareness on this hot topic has been a constant and difficult fight within the last decade. ‘Imposter’ syndrome or impostorism is frequently encountered amongst medical students and fellows‐in‐training, representing the fear of asking questions or asking for help since it would imply being ‘incompetent’. Therefore, impostorism would be defined as self‐doubt about ones' abilities and accomplishments, insecurity and fears of being considered a fraud. The competitive medical world and the presence of ‘bullies’ feeds this psychological occurrence. 3 Using Internet, information and communication technologies for bullying purposes represents cyberbullying. Thus, the anonymity of the perpetrator using cyberbullying and the impossibility to remove or avoid cyberspace content makes it more damaging for victims. 4 FIGURE 1 Timeline on reporting bullying in medicine. 1 , 2 , 3 AAMC, Association of American Medical Colleges; ACEM, Australian College for Emergency Medicine; BMA, British Medical Association; JAMA, Journal of the American Medical Association; US, United States. HOW TO DEFINE CAREER BEASTS (BULLIES)? Can we define bullying or is it different through each one's perspective? It can portray different forms starting from verbal abuse to perseverant inexplicable criticism, exaggerated sarcasm, persistent ignoring, isolating or belittling and public humiliation. Differentiating bullying from constructive criticism might sometimes be difficult, though necessary. 5 By inhibiting collegiality and cooperation, bullying in medicine will disrupt an entire team, affecting its ability to thrive and evolve (Figure 2). Studies have shown that abuse in a team can be harmful even for bystanders since they would be more likely to avoid the conflicts and take time off. FIGURE 2 What fuels people to become bullies or career beasts in medicine? 5 Different names can be assigned: career beasts, bullies, perpetrators. However, all have something in common: taking advantage of their position to abuse, intimidate, dominate, coerce colleagues who, although not weak human beings, they as are passive and usually with low self‐esteem. Perpetrators have the intent to humiliate and harm others and steps should be taken within a community to prevent them from gaining power. Continuous feedback, complex debates and brainstorming, constant peer reviewing including performance reviews are three pillars that form a good work environment. Developing a culture of compassion, collegiality and constant support should be taught from the start of the medical career. Since bullying is a learnt behaviour, surrounding oneself with honest and positive people is a first step in preventing a toxic workplace. By developing a good work environment one can contribute even as a bystander to a better and more productive team. Some perpetrators were victims at one point and getting in a position of power gives them the opportunity to abuse colleagues who are lower in the hierarchy. Abusive behaviour cannot be a defence mechanism because it will not protect one from being bullied and will enhance negative attitudes in a working environment. Growing both professionally and personally is essential since insecurity or jealousy can create perpetrators. Aiming to be a better professional would only attract opportunities and taking the way to the top does not imply a rite of passage to bullying, but also contributing to an understanding, forgiving and stress‐free environment. TEN STEPS ON HOW TO SAFELY CONFRONT CAREER BEASTS Being a good doctor also means to keep on improving in different ways: be open to new ideas and experiments, stay curious, and communicate to other professionals who have already achieved success in an area of interest. Be enthusiastically sceptical and find better or more efficient ways to do tasks. Learn from own results, good or bad. Failure is not a taboo subject, and many times it may help people advance. Becoming a master of self‐correction will be an asset in one's portfolio. Learn to be a team member and a leader because it is better to be prepared if the opportunity presents itself. Studies show that successful climbers are socially warm and accessible. Building communities of expertise is essential because experts in a certain field can evolve faster as a group and many new opportunities might arise afterwards. Acknowledge personal value and value as a doctor by building confidence and knowledge. Stay relevant by sharing your expertise and bear in mind that being updated might help in nurturing innovation and increasing creativity Be prepared to reinvent yourself, create new paradigms and take risks. Do not be afraid to change your field of interest. Be a listener and respect the workplace team. Open talks and brainstorming is not always about having the same opinion. Diversity and difference of opinion are a part of any functional team. Moreover, having more viewpoints would in return help you gain more perspective. Respect your path and how you got there. One's evolution is paved with effort, dedication and influence by mentors. Appreciating mentoring and paying it forward is the only way a medical system can evolve. Have an entrepreneurial mind‐set by attracting opportunities and landing them. Be vocal about your needs and speak out for yourself. Do not be afraid or ashamed to avoid misdemeanours and harassment but find a safe channel to present your complaint and ask for conclusions. One should not fear retribution in their field of work. Learning how to solve conflict should be part of the medical curriculum but also part of a person's education. Do not let medicine ‘consume’ your identity. Find time to evolve both personally and professionally. This will help you be more efficient without feeling a burden and without risking burn‐out. 3 FIGURING OUT A TOXIC WORK ENVIRONMENT When the work, the people, and the environment cause difficulties in life, a workplace is referred to as toxic. These disruptions can adversely affect physical health, resulting in sleepless nights, constant vigilant feel, sweaty palms, and a racing heart. When personal battles harm one's productivity, workplace toxicity is identified. There are multiple indicators and alarming signs that help identify such environment as early as possible. Chronic Stress If one starts to feel continuously stressed and wakes up in the morning forcing him/herself to go to work, this is one of the earliest signs. You're‐Overworked Usually, when employees work in a hostile workplace, they are often overloaded with job responsibilities and no proper work life balance. Being Bullied In general, bullying is one of the commonest reflection of a toxic work environment. However, in medical field, there are some specific areas where bullying appears as discrimination. Many reports exist regarding females in surgical specialities being judged and bullied for maternity leaves and not offered equality in leadership. In addition, they are being questioned for their competencies and doubting their potentials. Immigrant doctors in many countries experience overwhelming tension during speciality training and battle for equal chances for proper training. 6 Reports point toward men in academic medicine as promoters of bullying and hostile environments. 7 , 8 Office Gossips (SNITCH) If such kind of conversation is often heard at the workplace, then this is a sign of toxic culture. Gossips mean lack of clarity and this will ensure future trust problem and will pave the way for problematic intermediary to dominate and play the favouritism game. Rapid employee turn over If the place you are going to work can't retain competent employees, this is clearly a red flag. Being unappreciated or underestimated Appreciation is one of the core values of healthy work environment. If it is not there, this will lead to overworking, pushing people toward poor work life balance to please their employer. Favouritism Equality is one of the pillars of healthy work environment. If certain group gets all the credit and the praise, this is an early indicator of toxic work environment. Poor communication Communication is important to maintain clarity and avoid gossips and trust issues. Poor communication with peers and seniors usually indicates that no one in the workplace cares about the work environment or colleagues. This will lead to gossips and pave the way for career beasts to manipulate junior colleagues. Manipulation and blame games Healthy work culture is clearly shown during problem solving. If the manager or lead person starts to focus on blaming employees instead of providing solutions and adopting name and shame style, this is a hostile environment. Continuous fights and arguments This is the last sign and point of no return where it is clearly proven that this work culture is toxic and will not lead to any progress neither for the person involved nor the place itself. CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Systematic review of academic bullying in medical settings: dynamics and consequences

            Purpose To characterise the dynamics and consequences of bullying in academic medical settings, report factors that promote academic bullying and describe potential interventions. Design Systematic review. Data sources We searched EMBASE and PsycINFO for articles published between 1 January 1999 and 7 February 2021. Study selection We included studies conducted in academic medical settings in which victims were consultants or trainees. Studies had to describe bullying behaviours; the perpetrators or victims; barriers or facilitators; impact or interventions. Data were assessed independently by two reviewers. Results We included 68 studies representing 82 349 respondents. Studies described academic bullying as the abuse of authority that impeded the education or career of the victim through punishing behaviours that included overwork, destabilisation and isolation in academic settings. Among 35 779 individuals who responded about bullying patterns in 28 studies, the most commonly described (38.2% respondents) was overwork. Among 24 894 individuals in 33 studies who reported the impact, the most common was psychological distress (39.1% respondents). Consultants were the most common bullies identified (53.6% of 15 868 respondents in 31 studies). Among demographic groups, men were identified as the most common perpetrators (67.2% of 4722 respondents in 5 studies) and women the most common victims (56.2% of 15 246 respondents in 27 studies). Only a minority of victims (28.9% of 9410 victims in 25 studies) reported the bullying, and most (57.5%) did not perceive a positive outcome. Facilitators of bullying included lack of enforcement of institutional policies (reported in 13 studies), hierarchical power structures (7 studies) and normalisation of bullying (10 studies). Studies testing the effectiveness of anti-bullying interventions had a high risk of bias. Conclusions Academic bullying commonly involved overwork, had a negative impact on well-being and was not typically reported. Perpetrators were most commonly consultants and men across career stages, and victims were commonly women. Methodologically robust trials of anti-bullying interventions are needed. Limitations Most studies (40 of 68) had at least a moderate risk of bias. All interventions were tested in uncontrolled before–after studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              ‘If you can’t make it, you’re not tough enough to do medicine’: a qualitative study of Sydney-based medical students’ experiences of bullying and harassment in clinical settings

              Background Media exposés and academic literature reveal high rates of bullying and harassment of medical students, most commonly by consultant physicians and/or surgeons. Recent reports reveal the medical profession to be characterised by hierarchy, with verbal abuse a ‘rite of passage’, as well as sexist and racist behaviours. Methods Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with ten current or recently graduated medical students from Sydney-based medical schools. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed. Results Hierarchy, and a culture of self-sacrifice, resilience and deference, were identified as problematic elements of the medical profession. In the minds of participants, these factors created barriers to reporting mistreatment, as participants felt reporting led to being labelled a ‘troublemaker’, affecting career progression. Additionally, participants stated that avenues of recourse were unclear and did not guarantee confidentiality or desired outcomes. Conclusions Mistreatment is continuing in clinical teaching and has negative consequences on medical students’ mental health and learning. Structural change is needed to combat institutionalised mistreatment to ensure the wellbeing of future doctors and high quality patient care.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                drcatalinavladut@gmail.com
                Journal
                United European Gastroenterol J
                United European Gastroenterol J
                10.1002/(ISSN)2050-6414
                UEG2
                United European Gastroenterology Journal
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2050-6406
                2050-6414
                26 November 2022
                February 2023
                : 11
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1002/ueg2.v11.1 )
                : 134-137
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Gastroenterology “Prof Dr Agrippa Ionescu” Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucuresti Romania
                [ 2 ] Department of Gastroenterology Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust Liverpool UK
                [ 3 ] Department of Pathology Aretaieion Hospital National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece
                [ 4 ] Faculty of Medical Sciences Translational and Clinical Research Institute Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Cătălina Vlăduț, Department of Gastroenterology, “Prof Dr Agrippa Ionescu” Clinical Emergency Hospital, Bucuresti, Romania.

                Email: drcatalinavladut@ 123456gmail.com

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5099-3897
                Article
                UEG212341
                10.1002/ueg2.12341
                9892437
                36434767
                b10b147a-3549-4f29-8ccc-1d01f872e4c6
                © 2022 The Authors. United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of United European Gastroenterology.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 0, Pages: 4, Words: 2000
                Categories
                News
                News
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                February 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.5 mode:remove_FC converted:01.02.2023

                abuse,bullying,career,education,hierachy,medicine,shine
                abuse, bullying, career, education, hierachy, medicine, shine

                Comments

                Comment on this article