51
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Detecting differential growth of microbial populations with Gaussian process regression

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Microbial growth curves are used to study differential effects of media, genetics, and stress on microbial population growth. Consequently, many modeling frameworks exist to capture microbial population growth measurements. However, current models are designed to quantify growth under conditions for which growth has a specific functional form. Extensions to these models are required to quantify the effects of perturbations, which often exhibit nonstandard growth curves. Rather than assume specific functional forms for experimental perturbations, we developed a general and robust model of microbial population growth curves using Gaussian process (GP) regression. GP regression modeling of high-resolution time-series growth data enables accurate quantification of population growth and allows explicit control of effects from other covariates such as genetic background. This framework substantially outperforms commonly used microbial population growth models, particularly when modeling growth data from environmentally stressed populations. We apply the GP growth model and develop statistical tests to quantify the differential effects of environmental perturbations on microbial growth across a large compendium of genotypes in archaea and yeast. This method accurately identifies known transcriptional regulators and implicates novel regulators of growth under standard and stress conditions in the model archaeal organism Halobacterium salinarum. For yeast, our method correctly identifies known phenotypes for a diversity of genetic backgrounds under cyclohexamide stress and also detects previously unidentified oxidative stress sensitivity across a subset of strains. Together, these results demonstrate that the GP models are interpretable, recapitulating biological knowledge of growth response while providing new insights into the relevant parameters affecting microbial population growth.

          Related collections

          Most cited references76

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Bayes Factors

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Flexible Growth Function for Empirical Use

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts

              Since the completion of the genome sequence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in 19961,2, there has been an exponential increase in complete genome sequences accompanied by great advances in our understanding of genome evolution. Although little is known about the natural and life histories of yeasts in the wild, there are an increasing number of studies looking at ecological and geographic distributions3,4, population structure5-8, and sexual versus asexual reproduction9,10. Less well understood at the whole genome level are the evolutionary processes acting within populations and species leading to adaptation to different environments, phenotypic differences and reproductive isolation. Here we present one- to four-fold or more coverage of the genome sequences of over seventy isolates of the baker's yeast, S. cerevisiae, and its closest relative, S. paradoxus. We examine variation in gene content, SNPs, indels, copy numbers and transposable elements. We find that phenotypic variation broadly correlates with global genome-wide phylogenetic relationships. Interestingly, S. paradoxus populations are well delineated along geographic boundaries while the variation among worldwide S. cerevisiae isolates shows less differentiation and is comparable to a single S. paradoxus population. Rather than one or two domestication events leading to the extant baker's yeasts, the population structure of S. cerevisiae consists of a few well-defined geographically isolated lineages and many different mosaics of these lineages, supporting the idea that human influence provided the opportunity for cross-breeding and production of new combinations of pre-existing variation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Genome Res
                Genome Res
                genome
                genome
                GENOME
                Genome Research
                Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
                1088-9051
                1549-5469
                February 2017
                February 2017
                : 27
                : 2
                : 320-333
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA;
                [2 ]Biology Department, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA;
                [3 ]Computer Science Department, Center for Statistics and Machine Learning, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA
                Author notes
                Article
                9509184
                10.1101/gr.210286.116
                5287237
                27864351
                b0fb4081-68d2-425b-ac5f-1130a53308bd
                © 2017 Tonner et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

                This article, published in Genome Research, is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 24 May 2016
                : 15 November 2016
                Page count
                Pages: 14
                Funding
                Funded by: National Science Foundation (NSF) http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health (NIH) http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002
                Award ID: R00 HG006265
                Award ID: R01 MH101822
                Funded by: Alfred P. Sloan Foundation http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000879
                Funded by: NSF http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001
                Award ID: MCB-141-7750
                Categories
                Method

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content27

                Cited by28

                Most referenced authors1,384