Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A systematic review of the potential effects of medications and drugs of abuse on dopamine transporter imaging using [ 123I]I-FP-CIT SPECT in routine practice

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          In routine practice, dopamine transporter (DAT) imaging is frequently used as a diagnostic tool to support the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease or dementia with Lewy bodies. In 2008, we published a review on which medications and drugs of abuse may influence striatal [ 123I]I-FP-CIT binding and consequently may influence the visual read of an [ 123I]I-FP-CIT SPECT scan. We made recommendations on which drugs should be withdrawn before performing DAT imaging in routine practice. Here, we provide an update of the original work based on published research since 2008.

          Methods

          We performed a systematic review of literature without language restriction from January 2008 until November 2022 to evaluate the possible effects of medications and drugs of abuse, including the use of tobacco and alcohol, on striatal DAT binding in humans.

          Results

          The systematic literature search identified 838 unique publications, of which 44 clinical studies were selected. Using this approach, we found additional evidence to support our original recommendations as well as some new findings on potential effect of other medications on striatal DAT binding. Consequently, we updated the list of medications and drugs of abuse that may influence the visual read of [ 123I]I-FP-CIT SPECT scans in routine clinical practice.

          Conclusion

          We expect that a timely withdrawal of these medications and drugs of abuse before DAT imaging may reduce the incidence of false-positive reporting. Nevertheless, the decision to withdraw any medication must be made by the specialist in charge of the patient’s care and considering the pros and cons of doing so.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-023-06171-x.

          Related collections

          Most cited references108

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews

            Background Synthesis of multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in a systematic review can summarize the effects of individual outcomes and provide numerical answers about the effectiveness of interventions. Filtering of searches is time consuming, and no single method fulfills the principal requirements of speed with accuracy. Automation of systematic reviews is driven by a necessity to expedite the availability of current best evidence for policy and clinical decision-making. We developed Rayyan (http://rayyan.qcri.org), a free web and mobile app, that helps expedite the initial screening of abstracts and titles using a process of semi-automation while incorporating a high level of usability. For the beta testing phase, we used two published Cochrane reviews in which included studies had been selected manually. Their searches, with 1030 records and 273 records, were uploaded to Rayyan. Different features of Rayyan were tested using these two reviews. We also conducted a survey of Rayyan’s users and collected feedback through a built-in feature. Results Pilot testing of Rayyan focused on usability, accuracy against manual methods, and the added value of the prediction feature. The “taster” review (273 records) allowed a quick overview of Rayyan for early comments on usability. The second review (1030 records) required several iterations to identify the previously identified 11 trials. The “suggestions” and “hints,” based on the “prediction model,” appeared as testing progressed beyond five included studies. Post rollout user experiences and a reflexive response by the developers enabled real-time modifications and improvements. The survey respondents reported 40% average time savings when using Rayyan compared to others tools, with 34% of the respondents reporting more than 50% time savings. In addition, around 75% of the respondents mentioned that screening and labeling studies as well as collaborating on reviews to be the two most important features of Rayyan. As of November 2016, Rayyan users exceed 2000 from over 60 countries conducting hundreds of reviews totaling more than 1.6M citations. Feedback from users, obtained mostly through the app web site and a recent survey, has highlighted the ease in exploration of searches, the time saved, and simplicity in sharing and comparing include-exclude decisions. The strongest features of the app, identified and reported in user feedback, were its ability to help in screening and collaboration as well as the time savings it affords to users. Conclusions Rayyan is responsive and intuitive in use with significant potential to lighten the load of reviewers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies

              The Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) Consortium has refined its recommendations about the clinical and pathologic diagnosis of DLB, updating the previous report, which has been in widespread use for the last decade. The revised DLB consensus criteria now distinguish clearly between clinical features and diagnostic biomarkers, and give guidance about optimal methods to establish and interpret these. Substantial new information has been incorporated about previously reported aspects of DLB, with increased diagnostic weighting given to REM sleep behavior disorder and 123iodine-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) myocardial scintigraphy. The diagnostic role of other neuroimaging, electrophysiologic, and laboratory investigations is also described. Minor modifications to pathologic methods and criteria are recommended to take account of Alzheimer disease neuropathologic change, to add previously omitted Lewy-related pathology categories, and to include assessments for substantia nigra neuronal loss. Recommendations about clinical management are largely based upon expert opinion since randomized controlled trials in DLB are few. Substantial progress has been made since the previous report in the detection and recognition of DLB as a common and important clinical disorder. During that period it has been incorporated into DSM-5, as major neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies. There remains a pressing need to understand the underlying neurobiology and pathophysiology of DLB, to develop and deliver clinical trials with both symptomatic and disease-modifying agents, and to help patients and carers worldwide to inform themselves about the disease, its prognosis, best available treatments, ongoing research, and how to get adequate support.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                y.chahid@amsterdamumc.nl
                Journal
                Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
                Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
                European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                1619-7070
                1619-7089
                27 February 2023
                27 February 2023
                2023
                : 50
                : 7
                : 1974-1987
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.509540.d, ISNI 0000 0004 6880 3010, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, ; Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [2 ]GRID grid.509540.d, ISNI 0000 0004 6880 3010, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Clinical Pharmacy, ; Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [3 ]GRID grid.420685.d, ISNI 0000 0001 1940 6527, GE Healthcare, Pharmaceutical Diagnostics, ; Nightingales Ln, Chalfont Saint Giles, United Kingdom
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6223-3454
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6613-6638
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5542-0887
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6378-7638
                Article
                6171
                10.1007/s00259-023-06171-x
                10199883
                36847827
                b0ef6d9f-ffc9-4e4d-ac2e-ce8d5a473fcf
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 18 January 2023
                : 18 February 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100006775, GE Healthcare;
                Categories
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023

                Radiology & Imaging
                [123i]i-fp-cit,datscan,dopamine transporter imaging,drug interactions
                Radiology & Imaging
                [123i]i-fp-cit, datscan, dopamine transporter imaging, drug interactions

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content360

                Cited by10

                Most referenced authors1,945