0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The value of the current histological scores and classifications of ANCA glomerulonephritis in predicting long-term outcome

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Background

          Three different histological scores—histopathologic classification (Berden), Renal Risk Score (RRS) and the Mayo Clinic Chronicity Score (MCCS)—for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated glomerulonephritis (ANCA-GN) were compared to evaluate their association with patient and kidney prognosis of ANCA-GN.

          Methods

          Patients aged >18 years with at least 1 year of follow-up and biopsy-proven ANCA-GN entered this retrospective study. Renal biopsies were classified according to Berden's classification, RRS and MCCS. The first endpoint was end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), defined as chronic dialysis or estimated glomerular filtration rate <15 mL/min/1.73 m 2. The second endpoint was ESKD or death.

          Results

          Of 152 patients 84 were males, with median age of 63.8 years and followed for 46.9 (interquartile range 12.8–119) months, 59 (38.8%) reached the first endpoint and 20 died. The Kaplan–Meier curves showed that Berden and RRS were associated with first (Berden: P = .004, RRS: P < .001) and second (Berden: P = .001, RRS: P < .001) endpoint, MCCS with the first endpoint only when minimal + mild vs moderate + severe groups were compared ( P = .017), and with the second endpoint ( P < .001). Among the clinical/histological presentation features, arterial hypertension [odds ratio (OR) = 2.75, confidence interval (95% CI) 1.50–5.06; P = .0011], serum creatinine (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.09–1.25; P < .0001), and the percentage of normal glomeruli (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.96–0.99; P = .009) were the independent predictors of ESKD at multivariate analysis. When the three scores were included in multivariate analysis, RRS (OR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.15–4.24; P = .017) and MCCS (OR = 2.03, 95% CI 1.04–3.95; P = .037) remained predictive of ESKD, but Berden (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.62–2.22; P = .691) did not.

          Conclusion

          RRS and MCCS scores were independent predictors of kidney survival together with high serum creatinine and arterial hypertension at diagnosis, while Berden classification was not.

          Graphical Abstract

          Graphical Abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate.

          Equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are routinely used to assess kidney function. Current equations have limited precision and systematically underestimate measured GFR at higher values. To develop a new estimating equation for GFR: the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. Cross-sectional analysis with separate pooled data sets for equation development and validation and a representative sample of the U.S. population for prevalence estimates. Research studies and clinical populations ("studies") with measured GFR and NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey), 1999 to 2006. 8254 participants in 10 studies (equation development data set) and 3896 participants in 16 studies (validation data set). Prevalence estimates were based on 16,032 participants in NHANES. GFR, measured as the clearance of exogenous filtration markers (iothalamate in the development data set; iothalamate and other markers in the validation data set), and linear regression to estimate the logarithm of measured GFR from standardized creatinine levels, sex, race, and age. In the validation data set, the CKD-EPI equation performed better than the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation, especially at higher GFR (P < 0.001 for all subsequent comparisons), with less bias (median difference between measured and estimated GFR, 2.5 vs. 5.5 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)), improved precision (interquartile range [IQR] of the differences, 16.6 vs. 18.3 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)), and greater accuracy (percentage of estimated GFR within 30% of measured GFR, 84.1% vs. 80.6%). In NHANES, the median estimated GFR was 94.5 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) (IQR, 79.7 to 108.1) vs. 85.0 (IQR, 72.9 to 98.5) mL/min per 1.73 m(2), and the prevalence of chronic kidney disease was 11.5% (95% CI, 10.6% to 12.4%) versus 13.1% (CI, 12.1% to 14.0%). The sample contained a limited number of elderly people and racial and ethnic minorities with measured GFR. The CKD-EPI creatinine equation is more accurate than the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation and could replace it for routine clinical use. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Comparing the Areas under Two or More Correlated Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves: A Nonparametric Approach

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension Practice Guidelines

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Clin Kidney J
                Clin Kidney J
                ckj
                Clinical Kidney Journal
                Oxford University Press
                2048-8505
                2048-8513
                July 2024
                06 May 2024
                06 May 2024
                : 17
                : 7
                : sfae125
                Affiliations
                Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University , Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
                IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano , Milan, Italy
                IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano , Milan, Italy
                Nephrology Unit, ASST della Brianza, Vimercate Hospital , Vimercate, Italy
                Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University , Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
                IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano , Milan, Italy
                Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University , Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
                IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano , Milan, Italy
                Department of Medicine and Surgery, Pathology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori , Monza, Italy
                Department of Medicine and Surgery, Pathology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori , Monza, Italy
                Department of Medicine and Surgery, Nephrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Parma, University of Parma , Parma, Italy
                Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University , Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
                IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano , Milan, Italy
                IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano , Milan, Italy
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Gabriella Moroni; E-mail: gabriella.moroni@ 123456hunimed.eu

                Matteo Stella and Laura Locatelli equally contributed as first author.

                Gabriella Moroni and Renato Alberto Sinico equally contributed as senior authors.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2990-8620
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9254-618X
                Article
                sfae125
                10.1093/ckj/sfae125
                11217817
                b0ef4ea2-6ec3-4055-beff-dd0a50f2122c
                © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 05 September 2023
                : 02 July 2024
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Categories
                Original Article
                AcademicSubjects/MED00340

                Nephrology
                anca,berden,glomerulonephritis,mayo clinic chronicity score,renal risk score
                Nephrology
                anca, berden, glomerulonephritis, mayo clinic chronicity score, renal risk score

                Comments

                Comment on this article