9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Increase in Prevalence of Diabetic Ketoacidosis at Diagnosis Among Youth With Type 1 Diabetes: The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          OBJECTIVE

          We previously reported a high (˜30%) but stable prevalence of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at youth-onset diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (2002 and 2010). Given the changing demographics of youth-onset type 1 diabetes, we sought to evaluate temporal trends in the prevalence of DKA at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes from 2010 to 2016 among youth <20 years of age and evaluate whether any change observed was associated with changes in sociodemographic distribution of those recently diagnosed.

          RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

          We calculated prevalence of DKA within 1 month of type 1 diabetes diagnosis by year and evaluated trends over time (2010–2016) ( n = 7,612 incident diabetes cases; mean [SD] age 10.1 [4.5] at diagnosis). To assess whether trends observed were attributable to the changing distribution of sociodemographic factors among youth with incident type 1 diabetes, we estimated an adjusted relative risk (RR) of DKA in relation to calendar year, adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, education, health insurance status, language, season of diagnosis, and SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study site.

          RESULTS

          DKA prevalence increased from 35.3% (95% CI 32.2, 38.4) in 2010 to 40.6% (95% CI 37.8, 43.4) in 2016 ( P trend = 0.01). Adjustment for sociodemographic factors did not substantively change the observed trends. We observed a 2% annual increase in prevalence of DKA at or near diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (crude RR 1.02 [95% CI 1.01, 1.04] and adjusted RR 1.02 [95% CI 1.01, 1.04]; P = 0.01 for both).

          CONCLUSIONS

          Prevalence of DKA at or near type 1 diabetes diagnosis has increased from 2010 to 2016, following the high but stable prevalence observed from 2002 to 2010. This increase does not seem to be attributable to the changes in distribution of sociodemographic factors over time.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Incidence Trends of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes among Youths, 2002–2012

          Diagnoses of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in youths present a substantial clinical and public health burden. The prevalence of these diseases increased in the 2001-2009 period, but data on recent incidence trends are lacking.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study: Rationale, Findings, and Future Directions

            The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth (SEARCH) study was initiated in 2000, with funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and support from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, to address major knowledge gaps in the understanding of childhood diabetes. SEARCH is being conducted at five sites across the U.S. and represents the largest, most diverse study of diabetes among U.S. youth. An active registry of youth diagnosed with diabetes at age <20 years allows the assessment of prevalence (in 2001 and 2009), annual incidence (since 2002), and trends by age, race/ethnicity, sex, and diabetes type. Prevalence increased significantly from 2001 to 2009 for both type 1 and type 2 diabetes in most age, sex, and race/ethnic groups. SEARCH has also established a longitudinal cohort to assess the natural history and risk factors for acute and chronic diabetes-related complications as well as the quality of care and quality of life of persons with diabetes from diagnosis into young adulthood. Many youth with diabetes, particularly those from low-resourced racial/ethnic minority populations, are not meeting recommended guidelines for diabetes care. Markers of micro- and macrovascular complications are evident in youth with either diabetes type, highlighting the seriousness of diabetes in this contemporary cohort. This review summarizes the study methods, describes key registry and cohort findings and their clinical and public health implications, and discusses future directions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Diabetic ketoacidosis

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Diabetes Care
                Diabetes Care
                diacare
                dcare
                Diabetes Care
                Diabetes Care
                American Diabetes Association
                0149-5992
                1935-5548
                July 2021
                20 July 2021
                20 July 2021
                : 44
                : 7
                : 1573-1578
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
                [2] 2Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
                [3] 3Division of Diabetes Translation, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
                [4] 4Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
                [5] 5Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA
                [6] 6Northwest Lipid Research Laboratories, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
                [7] 7Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
                [8] 8Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
                [9] 9Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO
                [10] 10Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Elizabeth T. Jensen, ejensen@ 123456wakehealth.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2704-6634
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2480-8480
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3858-0517
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9074-7770
                Article
                200389
                10.2337/dc20-0389
                8323183
                34099516
                b0ad46a1-1bcd-4ce1-bef8-a61d0e5c1d66
                © 2021 by the American Diabetes Association

                Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at https://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.

                History
                : 25 February 2020
                : 24 April 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 36, Pages: 6
                Categories
                Epidemiology/Health Services Research

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                Endocrinology & Diabetes

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content1,052

                Cited by28

                Most referenced authors480