29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    1
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Does morality require sameness?: a response and question to Jennifer Frey

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract In a previous paper in this journal, Jennifer Frey presented three arguments against New-Kantian approaches. This paper briefly reiterates these arguments and shows why New-Kantian positions do not succumb to them. Most noteworthy, such positions are formal and not substantive. They care little about the question whether people pursue the same goods and instead stress the role of procedure in explicating rationality and consent in explicating the good. By stressing this distinction between formal and substantive approaches, this paper also provides a hint to the contentious topic of how Kantians can deal with cultural diversity, historicity, and plurality in ethics. It finishes with some questions to the author of the previous paper: do non-formal approaches imply that peace can only exist within similarity?

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Some limits of informed consent.

            O O'Neill (2003)
            Many accounts of informed consent in medical ethics claim that it is valuable because it supports individual autonomy. Unfortunately there are many distinct conceptions of individual autonomy, and their ethical importance varies. A better reason for taking informed consent seriously is that it provides assurance that patients and others are neither deceived nor coerced. Present debates about the relative importance of generic and specific consent (particularly in the use of human tissues for research and in secondary studies) do not address this issue squarely. Consent is a propositional attitude, so intransitive: complete, wholly specific consent is an illusion. Since the point of consent procedures is to limit deception and coercion, they should be designed to give patients and others control over the amount of information they receive and opportunity to rescind consent already given.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              The logic of scientific discovery

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                man
                Manuscrito
                Manuscrito
                UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência (Campinas, SP, Brazil )
                0100-6045
                2317-630X
                2023
                : 46
                : 4
                : e-2022-0073-R1
                Affiliations
                [1] South-Holland orgnameErasmus University Rotterdam Netherlands vanstraalen@ 123456esphil.eur.nl
                Article
                S0100-60452023000400405 S0100-6045(23)04600400405
                10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n4.hs
                afdf9dc2-5a64-4537-8494-b802b4300cb7

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 12 December 2022
                : 13 December 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 35, Pages: 0
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Categories
                Original Articles

                New-Kantianism,Kantian animal ethics,Consent,Ethics,Formal approaches

                Comments

                Comment on this article