0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Qui sont les meilleurs scientifiques en Tunisie? Analyse de l’édition 2023 de la plateforme “Research.com” Translated title: Who are the Best Scientists in Tunisia? Analysis of the 2023 edition of the “Research.com” platform.

      research-article
      1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 2 , 2 , 4 , 3 , 3 , 4 , 3 , 3 , 5 , 3 , 3 , 2 , 2 , 3
      La Tunisie Médicale
      Tunisian Society of Medical Sciences
      Bibliométrie, Science, Recherche, Personnel de recherche, Universités, Recherche sur les systèmes de santé publique, Sociétés savantes, Recherche biomédicale, Documentation, Indexation et rédaction du résumé, Rapport de recherche, Publications, Facteur d, impact, Bases de données bibliographiques, Ecriture, Tunisie, Bibliometrics, Science, Research, Research Personnel, Universities, Public Health Systems Research, Societies, Scientific, Biomedical Research, Documentation, Abstracting and Indexing, Research Report, Publications, Journal Impact Factor, Databases, Bibliographic, Writing, Tunisia

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          RESUME

          Objectif: Décrire, selon leurs disciplines académiques, la performance des scientifiques affectés aux structures tunisiennes de recherche, d’après la plateforme Research.com (https://research.com/), en 2023.Méthodes: C’est une lecture focalisée sur la productivité des scientifiques exerçant en Tunisie, selon la nouvelle édition 2023 de la plateforme internationale Research.com, assurant le monitorage de 26 disciplines académiques et de 166880 scientifiques, affiliés à environ trois milles structures de recherche, et représentant 1% des scientifiques de premier plan dans leurs disciplines. Le classement des chercheurs, dans cette plateforme, a été basé sur l’indicateur D-index (équivalent de l’indice h d’une discipline donnée), calculé à la date du 21 décembre 2022. Résultats: Une quinzaine des «Best Scientists», affiliés à des structures tunisiennes de recherche, a été sélectionnée par la plateforme Research.com (2023), appartenant à huit disciplines dont particulièrement la «Chimie», les «Sciences des Plantes et Agronomie» et «Ingénierie et Technologie». Ces chercheurs ont été rattachés à sept établissements dont les universités de «Sfax» et «Monastir » et le «Centre de Biotechnologie de Borj Cedria-Sidi Thabet». Parmi les «Best Scientists» tunisiens sélectionnés: les Professeurs Moncef NASRI (Sfax, «Biologie et Biochimie», D-index=74), Chedly ABDELLY (Borj Cedria, «Agronomie», D-index=72) et Adel M. ALIMI (Sfax, «Informatique», D-index=44).Conclusion: En Tunisie, la liste des «Best scientists» du classement Research.com (2023) a permis d’identifier deux collèges des leaders de la recherche scientifique («Sciences de la Santé» et «Sciences Fondamentales»), constituant des consortiums prioritaires pour le renforcement de la stratégie nationale d’appui à la mobilité et au réseautage des chercheurs, ainsi qu’à la prolifération et à la visibilité de leurs publications.

          ABSTRACT

          AIM: Describe the performance of scientists assigned to Tunisian research structures, according to their academic disciplines, according to the Research.com platform https://research.com/), in 2023. Methods: This is a reading focused on the productivity of scientists working in Tunisia, of the new 2023 edition of the international Research.com platform, ensuring the monitoring of 26 academic disciplines and 166880 scientists, affiliated with around three thousand research structures, and representing 1% of leading scientists in a discipline. In this platform, the ranking of researchers was based on the D-index indicator (equivalent to the h-index of a given discipline), calculated as of December 21, 2022. Results: Around fifteen of the “Best Scientists”, affiliated with Tunisian research structures, were selected by the Research.com platform (2023), belonging to eight disciplines including particularly “Chemistry”, “Plant Sciences and Agronomy” and “Engineering and Technology”. These researchers were attached to seven establishments including the universities of “Sfax” and “Monastir” and the “Borj Cedria - Sidi Thabet Biotechnology Center”. Among these winners: Professors Moncef NASRI (Sfax, “Biology and Biochemistry”, D-index=74), Chedly ABDELLY (Borj Cedria, “Agronomy”, D-index=72) and Adel M. ALIMI (Sfax, “computer science», D-index=44). Conclusion: In Tunisia, the list of “Best scientists” in the Research.com ranking (2023) made it possible to identify two colleges of leaders in scientific research (“Health Sciences” and “Fundamental Sciences”), constituting priority consortia for strengthening the national strategy to support the mobility and networking of researchers, as well as the proliferation and visibility of their publications.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Diversity, distribution and roles of osmoprotective compounds accumulated in halophytes under abiotic stress.

          Osmolytes are low-molecular-weight organic solutes, a broad group that encompasses a variety of compounds such as amino acids, tertiary sulphonium and quaternary ammonium compounds, sugars and polyhydric alcohols. Osmolytes are accumulated in the cytoplasm of halophytic species in order to balance the osmotic potential of the Na(+) and Cl(-) accumulated in the vacuole. The advantages of the accumulation of osmolytes are that they keep the main physiological functions of the cell active, the induction of their biosynthesis is controlled by environmental cues, and they can be synthesized at all developmental stages. In addition to their role in osmoregulation, osmolytes have crucial functions in protecting subcellular structures and in scavenging reactive oxygen species.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Health sector accreditation research: a systematic review.

            The purpose of this study was to identify and analyze research into accreditation and accreditation processes. A multi-method, systematic review of the accreditation literature was conducted from March to May 2007. The search identified articles researching accreditation. Discussion or commentary pieces were excluded. From the initial identification of over 3000 abstracts, 66 studies that met the search criteria by empirically examining accreditation were selected. DATA EXTRACTION AND RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: The 66 studies were retrieved and analyzed. The results, examining the impact or effectiveness of accreditation, were classified into 10 categories: professions' attitudes to accreditation, promote change, organizational impact, financial impact, quality measures, program assessment, consumer views or patient satisfaction, public disclosure, professional development and surveyor issues. The analysis reveals a complex picture. In two categories consistent findings were recorded: promote change and professional development. Inconsistent findings were identified in five categories: professions' attitudes to accreditation, organizational impact, financial impact, quality measures and program assessment. The remaining three categories-consumer views or patient satisfaction, public disclosure and surveyor issues-did not have sufficient studies to draw any conclusion. The search identified a number of national health care accreditation organizations engaged in research activities. The health care accreditation industry appears to be purposefully moving towards constructing the evidence to ground our understanding of accreditation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Tunis Med
                Tunis Med
                Tunis Med
                La Tunisie Médicale
                Tunisian Society of Medical Sciences
                0041-4131
                2724-7031
                December 2023
                05 December 2023
                : 101
                : 12
                : 871-878
                Affiliations
                [1] 1. Faculty of Medicine "Ibn Al Jazzar", Sousse. University of Sousse, Tunisia
                [2] 2. Information systems department. Sahloul university hospital centre, Sousse.
                [3] 3. Research laboratory LR19SP01: "Mesure et Appui à la performance hospitalière"
                [4] 4. Faculty of Pharmacy of Monastir. University of Monastir, Tunisia.
                [5] 5. Faculty of Medicine of Monastir. University of Monastir, Tunisia
                Article
                11261493
                38477193
                afb30f2a-6ec8-4c24-b07a-5480ed475b0c
                Copyright @ 2022

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History
                Categories
                Article

                recherche,bibliométrie,science,personnel de recherche,universités,recherche sur les systèmes de santé publique,sociétés savantes,recherche biomédicale,documentation,indexation et rédaction du résumé,rapport de recherche,publications,facteur d,impact,bases de données bibliographiques,ecriture,tunisie,bibliometrics,research,research personnel,universities,public health systems research,societies,scientific,biomedical research,abstracting and indexing,research report,journal impact factor,databases,bibliographic,writing,tunisia

                Comments

                Comment on this article