7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on risk and delayed rewards: a replication with British participants

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Here, we report three attempts to replicate a finding from an influential psychological study ( Griskevicius et al., 2011b). The original study found interactions between childhood SES and experimental mortality-priming condition in predicting risk acceptance and delay discounting outcomes. The original study used US student samples. We used British university students (replication 1) and British online samples (replications 2 and 3) with a modified version of the original priming material, which was tailored to make it more credible to a British audience. We did not replicate the interaction between childhood SES and mortality-priming condition in any of our three experiments. The only consistent trend of note was an interaction between sex and priming condition for delay discounting. We note that psychological priming effects are considered fragile and often fail to replicate. Our failure to replicate the original finding could be due to demographic differences in study participants, alterations made to the prime, or other study limitations. However, it is also possible that the previously reported interaction is not a robust or generalizable finding.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on risk and delayed rewards: a life history theory approach.

            Why do some people take risks and live for the present, whereas others avoid risks and save for the future? The evolutionary framework of life history theory predicts that preferences for risk and delay in gratification should be influenced by mortality and resource scarcity. A series of experiments examined how mortality cues influenced decisions involving risk preference (e.g., $10 for sure vs. 50% chance of $20) and temporal discounting (e.g., $5 now vs. $10 later). The effect of mortality depended critically on whether people grew up in a relatively resource-scarce or resource-plentiful environment. For individuals who grew up relatively poor, mortality cues led them to value the present and gamble for big immediate rewards. Conversely, for individuals who grew up relatively wealthy, mortality cues led them to value the future and avoid risky gambles. Overall, mortality cues appear to propel individuals toward diverging life history strategies as a function of childhood socioeconomic status, suggesting important implications for how environmental factors influence economic decisions and risky behaviors. 2011 APA, all rights reserved
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Most Published Research Findings Are False—But a Little Replication Goes a Long Way

              While the authors agree with John Ioannidis that "most research findings are false," here they show that replication of research findings enhances the positive predictive value of research findings being true.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                peerj
                peerj
                PeerJ
                PeerJ Inc. (San Francisco, USA )
                2167-8359
                25 July 2017
                2017
                : 5
                : e3580
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Newcastle University , Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom
                [2 ]University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh, United Kingdom
                Article
                3580
                10.7717/peerj.3580
                5530991
                28761784
                aeaba70a-8464-4762-a939-3fad72e74e28
                ©2017 Pepper et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.

                History
                : 30 March 2017
                : 23 June 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: European Research Council
                Award ID: AdG 666669 - COMSTAR
                This work was funded by European Research Council grant AdG 666669 - COMSTAR. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Psychiatry and Psychology

                financial risk,socioeconomic status,temporal discounting,childhood development,mortality,priming,replication

                Comments

                Comment on this article