5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Community and Academic Physicians Working Together in Integrated Health Care Systems

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To examine best practices and policies for effectively merging community and academic physicians in integrated health care systems.

          Methods

          Deans of US allopathic medical schools were systematically interviewed between February and June 2017 regarding growth in their faculty practice plan (FPP), including logistics and best practices for integration of community physicians.

          Results

          The survey was completed by 107 of 143 (74.8) of US medical school deans approached. Of these institutions, 73 met criteria for final analysis (research-based medical schools with FPPs of >300 physicians). Most academic medical center–based FPPs have increased in size over the last 5 years, with further growth anticipated via adding community physicians (85%). Because of disparate practice locations, integration of community and academic physicians has been slow. When fully integrated, community physicians predominantly have a clinical role with productivity incentives. Deans report that cultural issues must be addressed to avoid conflict. Consensus exists that transparent clinical work requirements for all FPP members, clearly defined productivity incentives, additional promotion tracks, and early involvement of department chairs and other leaders enhances trust and creates better synergy among all physician providers.

          Conclusion

          Findings from this study should help guide FPPs, academic medical center leaders, chief medical officers, and professional and trade organizations in working toward positive physician synergy in consolidated health care organizations. Work and cultural considerations must be addressed to honor distinct talents of each physician group, facilitating smooth transition from disparate groups to healthy synergy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Organizational Factors Contributing to Incivility at an Academic Medical Center and Systems-Based Solutions: A Qualitative Study

            Purpose A rise in incivility has been documented in medicine, with implications for patient care, organizational effectiveness, and costs. This study explored organizational factors that may contribute to incivility at one academic medical center and potential systems-level solutions to combat it. Method The authors completed semistructured individual interviews with full-time faculty members of the Department of Medicine (DOM) at the University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, with clinical appointments at six affiliated hospitals, between June and September 2016. They asked about participants’ experiences with incivility, potential contributing factors, and possible solutions. Two analysts independently coded a portion of the transcripts until a framework was developed with excellent agreement within the research team, as signified by the Kappa coefficient. A single coder completed analysis of the remaining transcripts. Results Forty-nine interviews with physicians from all university ranks and academic position descriptions were completed. All participants had collegial relationships with colleagues but had observed, heard of, or been personally affected by uncivil behavior. Incivility occurred furtively, face-to-face, or online. The participants identified several organizational factors that bred incivility including physician nonemployee status in hospitals, silos within the DOM, poor leadership, a culture of silence, and the existence of power cliques. They offered many systems-level solutions to combat incivility through prevention, improved reporting, and clearer consequences. Conclusions Existing strategies to combat incivility have focused on modifying individual behavior, but opportunities may exist to reduce incivility through a greater understanding of the role of health care organizations in shaping workplace culture.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Academic Medical Centers and Community Hospitals Integration: Trends and Strategies.

              Academic medical centers are widely recognized as vital components of the American health care system, generally differentiated from their community hospital peers by their tripartite mission of clinical care, education, and research. Community hospitals fill a critical and complementary role, serving as the primary sites for health care in most communities. Health care reform initiatives and economic pressures have created incentives for hospitals and health systems to integrate, resulting in a nationwide trend toward consolidation with academic medical centers leveraging their substantial assets to merge, acquire, or establish partnerships with their community peers. As these alliances accelerate, they have and will continue to affect the radiology groups providing services at these institutions. A deeper understanding of these new marketplace dynamics, changing relationships and potential strategies will help both academic and private practice radiologists adapt to this ongoing change.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes
                Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes
                Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes
                Elsevier
                2542-4548
                21 September 2021
                October 2021
                21 September 2021
                : 5
                : 5
                : 951-960
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Anesthesia, Roy J. & Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
                [b ]Department of Pharmacology, Roy J. & Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
                [c ]Department of Biochemistry, Roy J. & Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
                [d ]Roy J. & Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
                [e ]University of Iowa Healthcare, Iowa City, IA, USA
                Author notes
                [] Correspondence: Address to Debra A. Schwinn, MD, President's Office, Palm Beach Atlantic University, 901 S Flagler Dr, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, USA. debra_schwinn@ 123456pba.edu
                Article
                S2542-4548(21)00104-1
                10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.06.008
                8473661
                34604706
                ae97436a-3f5a-4b9a-9d95-9b3d2fc766b6
                © 2021 THE AUTHORS

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Original Article

                aamc, association of american medical colleges,amc, academic medical center,fpp, faculty practice plan

                Comments

                Comment on this article