45
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Metabolic biomarker signature to differentiate pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from chronic pancreatitis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Current non-invasive diagnostic tests can distinguish between pancreatic cancer (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)) and chronic pancreatitis (CP) in only about two thirds of patients. We have searched for blood-derived metabolite biomarkers for this diagnostic purpose.

          Design

          For a case–control study in three tertiary referral centres, 914 subjects were prospectively recruited with PDAC (n=271), CP (n=282), liver cirrhosis (n=100) or healthy as well as non-pancreatic disease controls (n=261) in three consecutive studies. Metabolomic profiles of plasma and serum samples were generated from 477 metabolites identified by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry.

          Results

          A biomarker signature (nine metabolites and additionally CA19-9) was identified for the differential diagnosis between PDAC and CP. The biomarker signature distinguished PDAC from CP in the training set with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.96 (95% CI 0.93–0.98). The biomarker signature cut-off of 0.384 at 85% fixed specificity showed a sensitivity of 94.9% (95% CI 87.0%–97.0%). In the test set, an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI 0.91–0.97) and, using the same cut-off, a sensitivity of 89.9% (95% CI 81.0%–95.5%) and a specificity of 91.3% (95% CI 82.8%–96.4%) were achieved, successfully validating the biomarker signature.

          Conclusions

          In patients with CP with an increased risk for pancreatic cancer (cumulative incidence 1.95%), the performance of this biomarker signature results in a negative predictive value of 99.9% (95% CI 99.7%–99.9%) (training set) and 99.8% (95% CI 99.6%–99.9%) (test set). In one third of our patients, the clinical use of this biomarker signature would have improved diagnosis and treatment stratification in comparison to CA19-9.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Elevated circulating branched chain amino acids are an early event in pancreatic adenocarcinoma development

          Most patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are diagnosed with advanced disease and survive less than 12 months 1 . PDAC has been linked with obesity and glucose intolerance 2-4 , but whether changes in circulating metabolites are associated with early cancer progression is unknown. To better understand metabolic derangements associated with early disease, we profiled metabolites in prediagnostic plasma from pancreatic cancer cases and matched controls from four prospective cohort studies. We find that elevated plasma levels of branched chain amino acids (BCAAs) are associated with a greater than 2–fold increased risk of future pancreatic cancer diagnosis. This elevated risk was independent of known predisposing factors, with the strongest association observed among subjects with samples collected 2 to 5 years prior to diagnosis when occult disease is likely present. We show that plasma BCAAs are also elevated in mice with early stage pancreatic cancers driven by mutant Kras expression, and that breakdown of tissue protein accounts for the increase in plasma BCAAs that accompanies early stage disease. Together, these findings suggest that increased whole–body protein breakdown is an early event in development of PDAC.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ceramide-orchestrated signalling in cancer cells.

            One crucial barrier to progress in the treatment of cancer has been the inability to control the balance between cell proliferation and apoptosis: enter ceramide. Discoveries over the past 15 years have elevated this sphingolipid to the lofty position of a regulator of cell fate. Ceramide, it turns out, is a powerful tumour suppressor, potentiating signalling events that drive apoptosis, autophagic responses and cell cycle arrest. However, defects in ceramide generation and metabolism in cancer cells contribute to tumour cell survival and resistance to chemotherapy. This Review focuses on ceramide signalling and the targeting of specific metabolic junctures to amplify the tumour suppressive activities of ceramide. The potential of ceramide-based therapeutics in the treatment of cancer is also discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium summit on the management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer

              Background Screening individuals at increased risk for pancreatic cancer (PC) detects early, potentially curable, pancreatic neoplasia. Objective To develop consortium statements on screening, surveillance and management of high-risk individuals with an inherited predisposition to PC. Methods A 49-expert multidisciplinary international consortium met to discuss pancreatic screening and vote on statements. Consensus was considered reached if ≥75% agreed or disagreed. Results There was excellent agreement that, to be successful, a screening programme should detect and treat T1N0M0 margin-negative PC and high-grade dysplastic precursor lesions (pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm). It was agreed that the following were candidates for screening: first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with PC from a familial PC kindred with at least two affected FDRs; patients with Peutz–Jeghers syndrome; and p16, BRCA2 and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) mutation carriers with ≥1 affected FDR. Consensus was not reached for the age to initiate screening or stop surveillance. It was agreed that initial screening should include endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and/or MRI/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography not CT or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. There was no consensus on the need for EUS fine-needle aspiration to evaluate cysts. There was disagreement on optimal screening modalities and intervals for follow-up imaging. When surgery is recommended it should be performed at a high-volume centre. There was great disagreement as to which screening abnormalities were of sufficient concern to for surgery to be recommended. Conclusions Screening is recommended for high-risk individuals, but more evidence is needed, particularly for how to manage patients with detected lesions. Screening and subsequent management should take place at high-volume centres with multidisciplinary teams, preferably within research protocols.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Gut
                Gut
                gutjnl
                gut
                Gut
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                0017-5749
                1468-3288
                January 2018
                20 January 2017
                : 67
                : 1
                : 128-137
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Medicine A, University Medicine, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University Greifswald , Greifswald, Germany
                [2 ]Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Klinikum der LMU München-Grosshadern , München, Germany
                [3 ]Section for Molecular Oncology, Institut for Experimental Cancer Research (IET), UKSH , Kiel, Germany
                [4 ]Metanomics Health GmbH , Berlin, Germany
                [5 ]metanomics GmbH , Berlin, Germany
                [6 ]Department of Surgery, University Hospital , Erlangen, Germany
                [7 ]Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery University Medicine Greifswald, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University , Greifswald, Germany
                [8 ]Clinic and Outpatient Clinic for Visceral-, Thorax- and Vascular Surgery, Medizinische Fakultät, TU Dresden , Dresden, Germany
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Professor Markus M Lerch, Department of Medicine A, University Medicine Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruchstrasse, Greifswald 17475, Germany; lerch@ 123456uni-greifswald.de

                JM and HK shared first co-authorship.

                RG and MML shared senior authorship.

                Article
                gutjnl-2016-312432
                10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312432
                5754849
                28108468
                ae8eaf12-a54f-44af-89a9-660df0948ce6
                Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History
                : 14 June 2016
                : 22 December 2016
                : 26 December 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: Seventh Framework Programme, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004963;
                Award ID: EU-FP-7: EPC-TM
                Funded by: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002347;
                Award ID: GANI-MED 03IS2061A, 0314107, 01ZZ9603, 01ZZ0103, 0
                Funded by: Deutsche Krebshilfe, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100005972;
                Award ID: 109102
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001659;
                Award ID: DFG MA 4115/1-2/3
                Categories
                1506
                Pancreas
                Original article
                Custom metadata
                unlocked
                free

                Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                pancreatic cancer,pancreatitis
                Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                pancreatic cancer, pancreatitis

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content250

                Cited by118

                Most referenced authors1,100