10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Sustainable Development Goals Under Threat? Multidimensional Impact of COVID-19 on Our Planet and Society Outweigh Short Term Global Pollution Reduction

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) call on all nations to accomplish 17 broad global development goals by 2030. However, the COVID-19 pandemic presents a challenging period in human history, causing large-scale impacts on society and the environment as governments shift priorities and divert funding in response to this pandemic. Through a literature survey, this manuscript is intended to provide critical insights into the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the SDGs as outlined by the United Nations. We briefly describe this pandemic's positive and short-term effects on the environment, followed by a critical evaluation of its potential long-term impacts on the environment, society, and the SDGs. On the basis of COVID-19 effects, the SDGs are classified into three categories: directly-affected SDGs, indirectly-affected SDGs, and a stand-alone category. The COVID-19-induced lockdowns and restrictions resulted in a short-term decline in environmental pollution and greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions, providing valuable data for climate advocates. These positive impacts were essentially temporary due to the synchronized global response to the pandemic. The halted focus and development of the SDGs greatly impacts the global green transition to a healthy and sustainable world. COVID-19 threatens to impede the progress toward a prosperous, environment-friendly, and sustainable global development in multiple ways. These multi-dimensional threats have been critically evaluated, along with a description of potential solutions to curtail the adverse effects of COVID-19 on the SDGs. Considering the limited data regarding the impacts of the pandemic on the SDGs, diverse collaborative studies at the regional and global levels are recommended.

          Graphical Abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references75

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 forced confinement

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Indirect effects of COVID-19 on the environment

            This research aims to show the positive and negative indirect effects of COVID-19 on the environment, particularly in the most affected countries such as China, USA, Italy, and Spain. Our research shows that there is a significant association between contingency measures and improvement in air quality, clean beaches and environmental noise reduction. On the other hand, there are also negative secondary aspects such as the reduction in recycling and the increase in waste, further endangering the contamination of physical spaces (water and land), in addition to air. Global economic activity is expected to return in the coming months in most countries (even if slowly), so decreasing GHG concentrations during a short period is not a sustainable way to clean up our environment.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Occurrence and toxicity of antibiotics in the aquatic environment: A review.

              In recent years, antibiotics have been used for human and animal disease treatment, growth promotion, and prophylaxis, and their consumption is rising worldwide. Antibiotics are often not fully metabolized by the body and are released into the aquatic environment, where they may have negative effects on the non-target species. This review examines the recent researches on eight representative antibiotics (erythromycin, trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline, oxytetracycline, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and amoxicillin). A detailed overview of their concentrations in surface waters, groundwater, and effluents is provided, supported by recent global human consumption and veterinary use data. Furthermore, we review the ecotoxicity of these antibiotics towards different groups of organisms, and assessment of the environmental risks to aquatic organisms. This review discusses and compares the suitability of currently used ecotoxicological bioassays, and identifies the knowledge gaps and future challenges. The risk data indicate that selected antibiotics may pose a threat to aquatic environments. Cyanobacteria were the most sensitive organisms when using standard ecotoxicological bioassays. Further studies on their chronic effects to aquatic organisms and the toxicity of antibiotic mixtures are necessary to fully understand the hazards these antibiotics present.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sustain Cities Soc
                Sustain Cities Soc
                Sustainable Cities and Society
                Elsevier Ltd.
                2210-6707
                2210-6715
                22 May 2022
                22 May 2022
                : 103962
                Affiliations
                [1 ]State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, National Engineering Laboratory for Lake Pollution Control and Ecological Restoration, State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory for Lake Pollution Control, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Science, Beijing
                [2 ]Department of Biological Sciences, Superior University Lahore, Pakistan
                [3 ]College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, PR China
                [4 ]Department of Geological Sciences, University Avenue, Upper Campus University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa
                [5 ]PEIE Research Chair for the Development of Industrial Estates and Free Zones, Center for Environmental Studies and Research,Sultan Qaboos University, Al-Khoud 123, Muscat, Oman
                [6 ]TAMS Department, iThemba LABS, Johannesburg, South Africa
                [7 ]State Key Laboratory of Marine Pollution, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, China
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence:
                Article
                S2210-6707(22)00282-7 103962
                10.1016/j.scs.2022.103962
                9124372
                ae737cbb-36a5-43ac-8e97-3bbc43fd1774
                © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 26 February 2022
                : 22 April 2022
                : 21 May 2022
                Categories
                Article

                covid-19,multiple effects,sustainable development goals,climate,environment

                Comments

                Comment on this article