0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sparsentan for Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis in the DUET Open-Label Extension: Long-term Efficacy and Safety

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Rationale & Objective

          Sparsentan is a novel, non-immunosuppressive, single-molecule, dual endothelin angiotensin receptor antagonist (DEARA) examined in the ongoing phase 2 DUET trial for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). In the DUET 8-week double-blind period, sparsentan resulted in greater proteinuria reduction versus irbesartan. We report the long-term efficacy and safety of sparsentan during the open-label extension over more than 4 years.

          Study Design

          Patients were examined from their first sparsentan dose (double-blind period or open-label extension) through 4.6 years.

          Setting & Participants

          Patients with FSGS, excluding secondary FSGS.

          Intervention

          Sparsentan (200, 400, and 800 mg/d).

          Outcomes

          Urinary protein-creatinine ratio, FSGS partial remission endpoint (urinary protein-creatinine ratio ≤1.5 g/g and >40% reduction from baseline), estimated glomerular filtration rate, and blood pressure approximately every 12 weeks. Treatment-emergent adverse events by year and cases/100 patient-years.

          Results

          109 patients were enrolled; 108 received ≥1 sparsentan dose; 103 entered the open-label extension (68 sparsentan, 35 irbesartan during the double-blind period). Sparsentan was ongoing in 45/108 patients (41.7%); median time to treatment discontinuation was 3.9 years (95% CI, 2.6-5.2). Mean percent proteinuria reduction from baseline was sustained through follow-up. Achieving partial remission within 9 months of first sparsentan dose (52.8% of patients) versus not achieving (47.2%) was associated with significantly slower rate of estimated glomerular filtration rate decline over the entire treatment period (−2.70 vs −6.56; P = 0.03) and in the first 2 years (−1.69 vs −6.46; P = 0.03). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (>9 cases/100 patient-years) were headache, peripheral edema, upper respiratory infection, hyperkalemia, and hypotension. Peripheral edema and hypotension declined from year 1 (13.9% and 15.7% of patients, respectively) to ≤4% in years ≥2. There were no cases of heart failure and no patient deaths.

          Limitations

          The open-label extension does not include a comparison group.

          Conclusions

          Long-term sparsentan treatment showed sustained proteinuria reduction and a consistent safety profile.

          Plain-Language Summary

          There is substantial unmet clinical need for safe and effective treatments for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), a kidney lesion with varied causes. Sparsentan is being studied for treatment of FSGS and targets 2 important pathways (endothelin-1 and angiotensin II) that lead to the loss of kidney function. In the 8-week randomized, double-blind DUET study in patients with FSGS, sparsentan reduced the amount of protein in the urine better than irbesartan (a blood pressure medicine often used to treat FSGS). We examined long-term treatment with sparsentan over >4 years in the DUET open-label extension. We found sustained proteinuria reduction in patients who continued treatment with sparsentan and a consistent safety profile with no new or unexpected adverse effects.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate.

          Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimates facilitate detection of chronic kidney disease but require calibration of the serum creatinine assay to the laboratory that developed the equation. The 4-variable equation from the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study has been reexpressed for use with a standardized assay. To describe the performance of the revised 4-variable MDRD Study equation and compare it with the performance of the 6-variable MDRD Study and Cockcroft-Gault equations. Comparison of estimated and measured GFR. 15 clinical centers participating in a randomized, controlled trial. 1628 patients with chronic kidney disease participating in the MDRD Study. Serum creatinine levels were calibrated to an assay traceable to isotope-dilution mass spectrometry. Glomerular filtration rate was measured as urinary clearance of 125I-iothalamate. Mean measured GFR was 39.8 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (SD, 21.2). Accuracy and precision of the revised 4-variable equation were similar to those of the original 6-variable equation and better than in the Cockcroft-Gault equation, even when the latter was corrected for bias, with 90%, 91%, 60%, and 83% of estimates within 30% of measured GFR, respectively. Differences between measured and estimated GFR were greater for all equations when the estimated GFR was 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 or greater. The MDRD Study included few patients with a GFR greater than 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Equations were not compared in a separate study sample. The 4-variable MDRD Study equation provides reasonably accurate GFR estimates in patients with chronic kidney disease and a measured GFR of less than 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2. By using the reexpressed MDRD Study equation with the standardized serum creatinine assay, clinical laboratories can report more accurate GFR estimates.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group.

            Serum creatinine concentration is widely used as an index of renal function, but this concentration is affected by factors other than glomerular filtration rate (GFR). To develop an equation to predict GFR from serum creatinine concentration and other factors. Cross-sectional study of GFR, creatinine clearance, serum creatinine concentration, and demographic and clinical characteristics in patients with chronic renal disease. 1628 patients enrolled in the baseline period of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study, of whom 1070 were randomly selected as the training sample; the remaining 558 patients constituted the validation sample. The prediction equation was developed by stepwise regression applied to the training sample. The equation was then tested and compared with other prediction equations in the validation sample. To simplify prediction of GFR, the equation included only demographic and serum variables. Independent factors associated with a lower GFR included a higher serum creatinine concentration, older age, female sex, nonblack ethnicity, higher serum urea nitrogen levels, and lower serum albumin levels (P < 0.001 for all factors). The multiple regression model explained 90.3% of the variance in the logarithm of GFR in the validation sample. Measured creatinine clearance overestimated GFR by 19%, and creatinine clearance predicted by the Cockcroft-Gault formula overestimated GFR by 16%. After adjustment for this overestimation, the percentage of variance of the logarithm of GFR predicted by measured creatinine clearance or the Cockcroft-Gault formula was 86.6% and 84.2%, respectively. The equation developed from the MDRD Study provided a more accurate estimate of GFR in our study group than measured creatinine clearance or other commonly used equations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Kidney Med
                Kidney Med
                Kidney Medicine
                Elsevier
                2590-0595
                26 April 2024
                June 2024
                26 April 2024
                : 6
                : 6
                : 100833
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
                [2 ]University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
                [3 ]Travere Therapeutics, Inc, San Diego, CA
                [4 ]University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN
                [5 ]Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO
                [6 ]Charles University, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
                [7 ]University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
                Author notes
                [] Addresses for Correspondence: Howard Trachtman, MD, Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, 1522 Simpson Road East, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. HowardTrachtman21@ 123456gmail.com
                []Radko Komers, MD, PhD, Travere Therapeutics, Inc, 3611 Valley Centre Dr Suite 300, San Diego, CA. radko.komers@ 123456travere.com
                Article
                S2590-0595(24)00044-X 100833
                10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100833
                11145552
                38831932
                ae5c742e-5f53-4945-8699-9dcb87756e73
                © 2024 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Original Research

                egfr slope,fsgs partial remission endpoint,fpre,kidney function,open-label extension,proteinuria,randomized controlled clinical trial,sparsentan

                Comments

                Comment on this article