15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Chlorin e6-Induced Photodynamic Effect Polarizes the Macrophage Into an M1 Phenotype Through Oxidative DNA Damage and Activation of STING

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) serves as an immunosuppressive agent in the malignant tumor microenvironment, facilitating the development and metastasis of lung cancer. The photodynamic effect destabilizes cellular homeostasis owing to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), resulting in the enhanced pro-inflammatory function of immunocytes. In our previous study, the Ce6-mediated photodynamic effect was found to have kept the viability of macrophages and to remodel them into the M1 phenotype. However, the mechanism remains unrevealed. The present study now explores the mechanism of photodynamic therapy (PDT)-mediated reprogramming of macrophages. As expected, Ce6-mediated PDT was capable of generating reactive oxygen species, which was continuously degraded, causing “low intensity” damage to DNA and thereby triggering subsequent DNA damage response in macrophages. The autophagy was thus observed in Ce6-treated macrophages and was shown to protect cells from being photodynamically apoptotic. More importantly, Ce6 PDT could activate the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) molecule, a sensor of DNA damage, which could activate the downstream nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) upon activation, mediating the polarization of macrophages towards the M1 phenotype thereupon. In addition, inhibition of ROS induced by PDT attenuated the DNA damage, STING activation, and M1-phenotype reprogramming. Furthermore, the silence of the STING weakened Ce6 treatment-mediated M1 remodeling of macrophages as well. Altogether, these findings indicate the Ce6-induced photodynamic effect polarizes macrophages into an M1 phenotype through oxidative DNA damage and subsequent activation of the STING. This work reveals the crucial mechanism by which photodynamic therapy regulates the macrophage phenotype and also provides a novel intervenable signaling target for remodeling macrophages into the M1 phenotype.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Regulation and function of the cGAS-STING pathway of cytosolic DNA sensing.

          The recognition of microbial nucleic acids is a major mechanism by which the immune system detects pathogens. Cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP) synthase (cGAS) is a cytosolic DNA sensor that activates innate immune responses through production of the second messenger cGAMP, which activates the adaptor STING. The cGAS-STING pathway not only mediates protective immune defense against infection by a large variety of DNA-containing pathogens but also detects tumor-derived DNA and generates intrinsic antitumor immunity. However, aberrant activation of the cGAS pathway by self DNA can also lead to autoimmune and inflammatory disease. Thus, the cGAS pathway must be properly regulated. Here we review the recent advances in understanding of the cGAS-STING pathway, focusing on the regulatory mechanisms and roles of this pathway in heath and disease.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Molecular mechanisms and cellular functions of cGAS–STING signalling

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              ROS and the DNA damage response in cancer

              Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are a group of short-lived, highly reactive, oxygen-containing molecules that can induce DNA damage and affect the DNA damage response (DDR). There is unequivocal pre-clinical and clinical evidence that ROS influence the genotoxic stress caused by chemotherapeutics agents and ionizing radiation. Recent studies have provided mechanistic insight into how ROS can also influence the cellular response to DNA damage caused by genotoxic therapy, especially in the context of Double Strand Breaks (DSBs). This has led to the clinical evaluation of agents modulating ROS in combination with genotoxic therapy for cancer, with mixed success so far. These studies point to context dependent outcomes with ROS modulator combinations with Chemotherapy and radiotherapy, indicating a need for additional pre-clinical research in the field. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge on the effect of ROS in the DNA damage response, and its clinical relevance.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Pharmacol
                Front Pharmacol
                Front. Pharmacol.
                Frontiers in Pharmacology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1663-9812
                03 March 2022
                2022
                : 13
                : 837784
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 School of Basic Medical Sciences , Hubei University of Medicine , Shiyan, China
                [2] 2 Department of Respiratory , Taihe Hospital of Shiyan , Hubei University of Medicine , Shiyan, China
                [3] 3 Hubei Key Laboratory of Embryonic Stem Cell Research , Hubei University of Medicine , Shiyan, China
                [4] 4 Department of Pharmacology , School of Basic Medical Sciences , Wuhan University , Wuhan, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Renu John, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, India

                Reviewed by: Xue-Yan He, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, United States

                Agnieszka Zdzisława Robaszkiewicz, University of Łódź, Poland

                *Correspondence: Tong-Fei Li, 20130021@ 123456hbmu.edu.cn ; Mei-Fang Wang, wmfpps02@ 123456hotmail.com
                [ † ]

                These authors have contributed equally to this work

                This article was submitted to Pharmacology of Anti-Cancer Drugs, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology

                Article
                837784
                10.3389/fphar.2022.837784
                8927874
                35308251
                ae4017ed-9840-41ab-8496-60e496ec6379
                Copyright © 2022 Yu, Han, Li, Peng, Li, Xu, Wang, Yang, Chen, Wang and Li.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 17 December 2021
                : 07 February 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province , doi 10.13039/501100003819;
                Award ID: 2020CFB152
                Categories
                Pharmacology
                Original Research

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                macrophages,photodynamic effect,reactive oxygen species (ros),dna damage response (ddr),sting molecule,autophagy

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content359

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors580