5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      mHealth Interventions to Reduce Physical Inactivity and Sedentary Behavior in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Children and adolescents increasingly do not meet physical activity (PA) recommendations. Hence, insufficient PA (IPA) and sedentary behavior (SB) among children and adolescents are relevant behavior change domains for using individualized mobile health (mHealth) interventions.

          Objective

          This review and meta-analysis investigated the effectiveness of mHealth interventions on IPA and SB, with a special focus on the age and level of individualization.

          Methods

          PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials published between January 2000 and March 2021. mHealth interventions for primary prevention in children and adolescents addressing behavior change related to IPA and SB were included. Included studies were compared for content characteristics and methodological quality and summarized narratively. In addition, a meta-analysis with a subsequent exploratory meta-regression examining the moderating effects of age and individualization on overall effectiveness was performed.

          Results

          On the basis of the inclusion criteria, 1.3% (11/828) of the preliminary identified studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, and 1.2% (10/828) were included in the meta-analysis. Trials included a total of 1515 participants (mean age (11.69, SD 0.788 years; 65% male and 35% female) self-reported (3/11, 27%) or device-measured (8/11, 73%) health data on the duration of SB and IPA for an average of 9.3 (SD 5.6) weeks. Studies with high levels of individualization significantly decreased insufficient PA levels (Cohen d=0.33; 95% CI 0.08-0.58; Z=2.55; P=.01), whereas those with low levels of individualization (Cohen d=−0.06; 95% CI −0.32 to 0.20; Z=0.48; P=.63) or targeting SB (Cohen d=−0.11; 95% CI −0.01 to 0.23; Z=1.73; P=.08) indicated no overall significant effect. The heterogeneity of the studies was moderate to low, and significant subgroup differences were found between trials with high and low levels of individualization ( χ 2 1=4.0; P=.04; I 2=75.2%). Age as a moderator variable showed a small effect; however, the results were not significant, which might have been because of being underpowered.

          Conclusions

          Evidence suggests that mHealth interventions for children and adolescents can foster moderate reductions in IPA but not SB. Moreover, individualized mHealth interventions to reduce IPA seem to be more effective for adolescents than for children. Although, to date, only a few mHealth studies have addressed inactive and sedentary young people, and their quality of evidence is moderate, these findings indicate the relevance of individualization on the one hand and the difficulties in reducing SB using mHealth interventions on the other.

          Trial Registration

          PROSPERO CRD42020209417; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=209417

          Related collections

          Most cited references87

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The theory of planned behavior

            Icek Ajzen (1991)
            Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
                JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
                JMU
                JMIR mHealth and uHealth
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                2291-5222
                May 2022
                11 May 2022
                : 10
                : 5
                : e35920
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Human Movement Faculty of Psychology and Human Movement Science University of Hamburg Hamburg Germany
                [2 ] Department of Biological Psychology and Neuroergonomics Institute for Psychology and Occupational Science Technical University Berlin Berlin Germany
                [3 ] Department of Performance, Neuroscience, Therapy and Health Faculty of Health Sciences Medical School Hamburg Hamburg Germany
                [4 ] Institute of Sports and Sports Science Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Karlsruhe Germany
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Kathrin Wunsch kathrin.wunsch@ 123456kit.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4714-3722
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9291-2191
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9400-4130
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5736-2980
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1082-9141
                Article
                v10i5e35920
                10.2196/35920
                9133983
                35544294
                ae34681f-bd51-4018-8667-3a0611463e69
                ©Hannes Baumann, Janis Fiedler, Kathrin Wunsch, Alexander Woll, Bettina Wollesen. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org), 11.05.2022.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 22 December 2021
                : 7 February 2022
                : 15 March 2022
                : 23 March 2022
                Categories
                Review
                Review

                health behavior change,individualization,sedentary behavior,physical activity,tailored interventions,personalized medicine,health app,mobile phone

                Comments

                Comment on this article