17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Who supports science-related populism? A nationally representative survey on the prevalence and explanatory factors of populist attitudes toward science in Switzerland

      research-article
      1 , * , , 1 , 2 , 2
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Science and its epistemology have been challenged by science-related populism—a variant of populism suggesting that a virtuous “ordinary people,” and not allegedly corrupt academic elites, should determine the “production of truth.” Yet almost no studies have assessed the prevalence of science-related populist attitudes among the population and explanatory factors thereof. Based on a nationally representative survey in Switzerland, our study shows that only a minority of the Swiss exhibit science-related populist attitudes. Comparisons with reference studies suggest that these attitudes may be less prevalent in Switzerland than political populist attitudes. Those who hold stronger science-related populist attitudes tend to have no university education, less personal contact with science, lower scientific literacy, and higher interest in science. Additional analyses show that left-leaning citizens are less likely to hold science-related populist attitudes than moderate and right-leaning citizens. Our findings contribute to current debates about a potential fragmentation of science communication audiences and call for further research on the sociodemographic and attitudinal profiles of people with skeptical orientations toward science.

          Related collections

          Most cited references111

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations.

          Interpretation of regression coefficients is sensitive to the scale of the inputs. One method often used to place input variables on a common scale is to divide each numeric variable by its standard deviation. Here we propose dividing each numeric variable by two times its standard deviation, so that the generic comparison is with inputs equal to the mean +/-1 standard deviation. The resulting coefficients are then directly comparable for untransformed binary predictors. We have implemented the procedure as a function in R. We illustrate the method with two simple analyses that are typical of applied modeling: a linear regression of data from the National Election Study and a multilevel logistic regression of data on the prevalence of rodents in New York City apartments. We recommend our rescaling as a default option--an improvement upon the usual approach of including variables in whatever way they are coded in the data file--so that the magnitudes of coefficients can be directly compared as a matter of routine statistical practice. (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas Model

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                8 August 2022
                2022
                : 17
                : 8
                : e0271204
                Affiliations
                [1 ] University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
                [2 ] University of Münster, Münster, Germany
                Shenzhen University, CHINA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5707-7568
                Article
                PONE-D-21-17250
                10.1371/journal.pone.0271204
                9359586
                35939426
                ae26bfe5-43fe-4d64-b55a-a6bddc890ebf
                © 2022 Mede et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 25 May 2021
                : 26 June 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 2, Pages: 20
                Funding
                Funded by: Gebert Rüf Stiftung (CH)
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Gebert Rüf Stiftung (CH)
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002331, Stiftung Mercator Schweiz;
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002331, Stiftung Mercator Schweiz;
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Universität Zürich
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100006447, Universität Zürich;
                Award Recipient :
                This research received financial support by the Gebert Rüf Foundation ( https://www.grstiftung.ch/en.html), the Mercator Foundation Switzerland ( https://www.stiftung-mercator.ch/), and the University of Zurich ( https://www.uzh.ch/cmsssl/en.html). Funding was acquired by J.M. and M.S.S. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychological Attitudes
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychological Attitudes
                Science Policy
                Science and Technology Workforce
                Careers in Research
                Scientists
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Professions
                Scientists
                Social Sciences
                Anthropology
                Cultural Anthropology
                Religion
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Religion
                People and Places
                Geographical Locations
                Europe
                Switzerland
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Decision Making
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Decision Making
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Decision Making
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognition
                Decision Making
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Design
                Survey Research
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Ethnicities
                European People
                Italian People
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Academic Skills
                Literacy
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Academic Skills
                Literacy
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Academic Skills
                Literacy
                Custom metadata
                The R code we used for the statistical analyses is available at https://osf.io/qj4xr/. Survey data and additional materials (e.g., the questionnaires and a methodological report, the former in German, French, and Italian, the latter only in German) are publicly available in the online repository SWISSUbase (doi: 10.48573/wpf5-hf36).

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article