6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comprehensive analysis of complications after transperineal prostate biopsy without antibiotic prophylaxis: results of a multicenter trial with 30 days’ follow-up

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          To investigate infectious and non-infectious complications after transperineal prostate biopsy (TPB) without antibiotic prophylaxis in a multicenter cohort. Secondly, to identify whether increasing the number of cores was predictive for the occurrence of complications. Thirdly, to examine the relation between TPB and erectile dysfunction.

          Methods

          We analyzed a retrospective multicenter cohort of 550 patients from three different urological centers undergoing TPB without antibiotic prophylaxis. The median number of cores was 26. Demographic and clinical data were extracted by reviewing patients’ electronic medical records and follow-up data such as postoperative complications obtained by structured phone interviews. To investigate the influence of the number of cores taken on the occurrence of complications, we performed univariate and multivariate mixed effects logistic regression models.

          Results

          There was no case of sepsis reported. Overall, 6.0% of patients (33/550) presented with any complication besides mild macrohematuria. In all, 46/47 (98%) complications were ≤Grade 2 according to Clavien–Dindo. In multivariate regression analyses, an increased number of cores was associated with overall complications (odds ratio (OR) 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.14, P = 0.01) and specifically bleeding complications (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.11–1.50, P = 0.01) but not with infectious complications (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.97–1.10, P = 0.67). A total of 14.4% of patients referred impairment of erectile function after TPB. Of note, 98% of these men were diagnosed with prostate cancer.

          Conclusions

          This is the first multicenter trial to investigate complications after TPB without antibiotic prophylaxis. In our study, we found no case of sepsis. This underlines the safety advantage of TPB even without antibiotic prophylaxis and supports the ongoing initiative to abandon TRB of the prostate. A higher number of cores were associated with an increase in overall complications specifically bleeding complications, but not with infectious complications. Post-biopsy erectile dysfunction was mainly present in patients diagnosed with PCa.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

          Although quality assessment is gaining increasing attention, there is still no consensus on how to define and grade postoperative complications. This shortcoming hampers comparison of outcome data among different centers and therapies and over time. A classification of complications published by one of the authors in 1992 was critically re-evaluated and modified to increase its accuracy and its acceptability in the surgical community. Modifications mainly focused on the manner of reporting life-threatening and permanently disabling complications. The new grading system still mostly relies on the therapy used to treat the complication. The classification was tested in a cohort of 6336 patients who underwent elective general surgery at our institution. The reproducibility and personal judgment of the classification were evaluated through an international survey with 2 questionnaires sent to 10 surgical centers worldwide. The new ranking system significantly correlated with complexity of surgery (P < 0.0001) as well as with the length of the hospital stay (P < 0.0001). A total of 144 surgeons from 10 different centers around the world and at different levels of training returned the survey. Ninety percent of the case presentations were correctly graded. The classification was considered to be simple (92% of the respondents), reproducible (91%), logical (92%), useful (90%), and comprehensive (89%). The answers of both questionnaires were not dependent on the origin of the reply and the level of training of the surgeons. The new complication classification appears reliable and may represent a compelling tool for quality assessment in surgery in all parts of the world.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Classification of Surgical Complications

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.

              To present a summary of the 2016 version of the European Association of Urology (EAU) - European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) - International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) Guidelines on screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent of clinically localised prostate cancer (PCa).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                august.sigle@uniklinik-freiburg.de
                Journal
                Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis
                Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis
                Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                1365-7852
                1476-5608
                15 July 2021
                15 July 2021
                2022
                : 25
                : 2
                : 264-268
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.419829.f, ISNI 0000 0004 0559 5293, Department of Urology, , Klinikum Leverkusen, ; Leverkusen, Germany
                [2 ]GRID grid.5963.9, Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, , Medical Centre – University of Freiburg, ; Freiburg, Germany
                [3 ]Praxis am Ebertplatz, Cologne, Germany
                [4 ]Urology Department, Clinic LINKS VOM RHEIN, Cologne, Germany
                [5 ]GRID grid.5963.9, Institute of Digitalization in Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, , Medical Centre – University of Freiburg, ; Freiburg, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6857-8149
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1919-4154
                Article
                423
                10.1038/s41391-021-00423-3
                9184280
                34267332
                ade84ac6-29d9-4313-8021-2e0a16442960
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 11 February 2021
                : 21 June 2021
                : 28 June 2021
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2022

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                cancer therapy,cancer screening
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                cancer therapy, cancer screening

                Comments

                Comment on this article