32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Epigenetics as a mediator of plasticity in cancer

      1 , 2
      Science
      American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The concept of an epigenetic landscape describing potential cellular fates arising from pluripotent cells, first advanced by Conrad Waddington, has evolved in light of experiments showing nondeterministic outcomes of regulatory processes and mathematical methods for quantifying stochasticity. In this Review, we discuss modern approaches to epigenetic and gene regulation landscapes and the associated ideas of entropy and attractor states, illustrating how their definitions are both more precise and relevant to understanding cancer etiology and the plasticity of cancerous states. We address the interplay between different types of regulatory landscapes and how their changes underlie cancer progression. We also consider the roles of cellular aging and intrinsic and extrinsic stimuli in modulating cellular states and how landscape alterations can be quantitatively mapped onto phenotypic outcomes and thereby used in therapy development.

          Plasticity of cancer cell phenotypes

          During differentiation, cells adopt phenotypic states of progressive specificity. Cancer cells violate this property, instead adopting increased plasticity of structure and function. Epigenetic change has been considered a developmental landscape that can channel specific differentiation events and define and constrain distinct phenotypic and gene expression states. In a Review, Feinberg and Levchenko discuss how cancer epigenetic landscapes can be defined quantitatively, borrowing from theory used in physical sciences to define potential energy and its relationship to physical or chemical states. This strategy has yielded new insights whereby stochastic changes in the epigenetic landscape of cancer cells drive oncogenic phenotypes. Such analyses can also reveal pathogenic signaling and therapeutic targets. —GKA

          Abstract

          A review discusses how epigenetic stochasticity can connect mutations and environmental perturbations to cancer progression and treatment.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND

          During differentiation, living cells within complex organisms adopt phenotypic states of progressive specificity. Cancerous cells and tissues violate this property, adopting increased plasticity of cell states, tissue structure, and function during their progression. The information about the repertoire of normal differentiation outcomes is genetically encoded, but the information about the particular realization of this potential and cell regulation in response to the environment is encoded epigenetically in DNA methylation and biochemical modification of chromatin. Dating back to Conrad Waddington’s prescient work, epigenetic change has been viewed schematically as a developmental landscape that can channel specific differentiation events and define and constrain distinct phenotypic and gene expression states. More recently, cancer onset and progression have been viewed as a reversal or deformation of this landscape. In the physical sciences, potential energy landscapes and their relationships to the probability distribution of physical or chemical states have been developed and refined for decades, but they have only recently been applied to more quantitatively realize Waddington’s classical landscape idea. Such approaches are particularly appealing in describing the cancer epigenetic landscape given that the plasticity of cell states realized on such a landscape lies at the functional core of the disease.

          ADVANCES

          Recent developments in experimental technologies, including single cell–resolution analysis of mRNA and protein expression as well as molecular assays of epigenetic modifications of DNA and histones, have enriched our understanding of the diversity of phenotypic states defined by genomic information and epigenetic control. In this work, we expand on the emerging view that there is considerable variability in the expression of biological molecules even within presumably isogenic cells in normal homeostatic tissues or in well-defined cell lines in cell culture. This revelation suggests that the biological processes may be essentially stochastic and that biological variability on the cellular level can be indicative of—or even drive—important aspects of biological function. This analysis has also enabled assessment of the probability distributions of different cellular states, or quasipotential energy, and the use of these to determine the associated entropy, a measure of informational uncertainty. These measures, which we define in detail, enable a precise and quantitative definition of the underlying epigenetic landscapes, coordinately reflected by gene expression landscapes. Cancer-related genetic and epigenetic alterations can increase the entropy of the landscape as a whole and result in higher variability and occupancy of otherwise cryptic attractors. An increase in entropy and thus heterogeneity of the responses—rather than alteration of the average response—is emerging as a key and often overlooked feature of the landscape deformation in cancer pathogenesis. Changes in entropy can also accompany cell differentiation and aging in ways that further inform cancer etiology. They also permit distinguishing phenotypic plasticity from phenotypic heterogeneity. Using recent observations and landscape conceptualization, we outline several scenarios that can occur during precancerous and cancerous progression. We also discuss the molecular mechanisms enabling these scenarios, relating them to specific landscape transformations. We suggest how the relationship between the epigenetic landscape alterations and corresponding phenotypic changes can be quantitatively assessed and used to further understand the information transfer in signaling pathways and to develop new therapeutic interventions. This approach can also incorporate recently introduced ideas of the archetypical states of cells within normal and cancerous tissues.

          OUTLOOK

          New integrated theoretical and experimental methods in quantitative analyses of the cancer epigenetic landscape provide the tools to understand the connections between genetic and environmental drivers of cancer evolution and the relationships between epigenetic regulatory networks that mediate the landscape. Continued advances in single-cell measurements, including assessment of DNA methylation, genomic sequencing, and chromatin analysis, will allow further understanding of the dynamics of the landscapes having progressively increasing complexity and accounting for tumor evolution, progression to invasive and metastatic spread, and associated alterations in anatomical organization and structure. Moreover, a greater understanding of biological stochasticity, defined mathematically as epigenetic and gene expression entropy, can uncover the cellular actors and mechanisms by which cancer plasticity enables escape from natural defenses and therapeutic interventions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references109

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types

          Background It is not yet known whether DNA methylation levels can be used to accurately predict age across a broad spectrum of human tissues and cell types, nor whether the resulting age prediction is a biologically meaningful measure. Results I developed a multi-tissue predictor of age that allows one to estimate the DNA methylation age of most tissues and cell types. The predictor, which is freely available, was developed using 8,000 samples from 82 Illumina DNA methylation array datasets, encompassing 51 healthy tissues and cell types. I found that DNA methylation age has the following properties: first, it is close to zero for embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells; second, it correlates with cell passage number; third, it gives rise to a highly heritable measure of age acceleration; and, fourth, it is applicable to chimpanzee tissues. Analysis of 6,000 cancer samples from 32 datasets showed that all of the considered 20 cancer types exhibit significant age acceleration, with an average of 36 years. Low age-acceleration of cancer tissue is associated with a high number of somatic mutations and TP53 mutations, while mutations in steroid receptors greatly accelerate DNA methylation age in breast cancer. Finally, I characterize the 353 CpG sites that together form an aging clock in terms of chromatin states and tissue variance. Conclusions I propose that DNA methylation age measures the cumulative effect of an epigenetic maintenance system. This novel epigenetic clock can be used to address a host of questions in developmental biology, cancer and aging research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A chromatin-mediated reversible drug-tolerant state in cancer cell subpopulations.

            Accumulating evidence implicates heterogeneity within cancer cell populations in the response to stressful exposures, including drug treatments. While modeling the acute response to various anticancer agents in drug-sensitive human tumor cell lines, we consistently detected a small subpopulation of reversibly "drug-tolerant" cells. These cells demonstrate >100-fold reduced drug sensitivity and maintain viability via engagement of IGF-1 receptor signaling and an altered chromatin state that requires the histone demethylase RBP2/KDM5A/Jarid1A. This drug-tolerant phenotype is transiently acquired and relinquished at low frequency by individual cells within the population, implicating the dynamic regulation of phenotypic heterogeneity in drug tolerance. The drug-tolerant subpopulation can be selectively ablated by treatment with IGF-1 receptor inhibitors or chromatin-modifying agents, potentially yielding a therapeutic opportunity. Together, these findings suggest that cancer cell populations employ a dynamic survival strategy in which individual cells transiently assume a reversibly drug-tolerant state to protect the population from eradication by potentially lethal exposures. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The BCL-2 protein family: opposing activities that mediate cell death.

              BCL-2 family proteins, which have either pro- or anti-apoptotic activities, have been studied intensively for the past decade owing to their importance in the regulation of apoptosis, tumorigenesis and cellular responses to anti-cancer therapy. They control the point of no return for clonogenic cell survival and thereby affect tumorigenesis and host-pathogen interactions and regulate animal development. Recent structural, phylogenetic and biological analyses, however, suggest the need for some reconsideration of the accepted organizational principles of the family and how the family members interact with one another during programmed cell death. Although these insights into interactions among BCL-2 family proteins reveal how these proteins are regulated, a unifying hypothesis for the mechanisms they use to activate caspases remains elusive.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Science
                Science
                American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
                0036-8075
                1095-9203
                February 10 2023
                February 10 2023
                : 379
                : 6632
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center for Epigenetics, Johns Hopkins University Schools of Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, and Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
                [2 ]Yale Systems Biology Institute and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, West Haven, CT 06516, USA.
                Article
                10.1126/science.aaw3835
                36758093
                ad98d827-90f1-4bb0-a366-0f9d256136ab
                © 2023

                Free to read

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article