14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evidence for embracing normative modeling

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In this work, we expand the normative model repository introduced in Rutherford et al., 2022a to include normative models charting lifespan trajectories of structural surface area and brain functional connectivity, measured using two unique resting-state network atlases (Yeo-17 and Smith-10), and an updated online platform for transferring these models to new data sources. We showcase the value of these models with a head-to-head comparison between the features output by normative modeling and raw data features in several benchmarking tasks: mass univariate group difference testing (schizophrenia versus control), classification (schizophrenia versus control), and regression (predicting general cognitive ability). Across all benchmarks, we show the advantage of using normative modeling features, with the strongest statistically significant results demonstrated in the group difference testing and classification tasks. We intend for these accessible resources to facilitate the wider adoption of normative modeling across the neuroimaging community.

          Related collections

          Most cited references127

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python

          SciPy is an open-source scientific computing library for the Python programming language. Since its initial release in 2001, SciPy has become a de facto standard for leveraging scientific algorithms in Python, with over 600 unique code contributors, thousands of dependent packages, over 100,000 dependent repositories and millions of downloads per year. In this work, we provide an overview of the capabilities and development practices of SciPy 1.0 and highlight some recent technical developments.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity.

            Information processing in the cerebral cortex involves interactions among distributed areas. Anatomical connectivity suggests that certain areas form local hierarchical relations such as within the visual system. Other connectivity patterns, particularly among association areas, suggest the presence of large-scale circuits without clear hierarchical relations. In this study the organization of networks in the human cerebrum was explored using resting-state functional connectivity MRI. Data from 1,000 subjects were registered using surface-based alignment. A clustering approach was employed to identify and replicate networks of functionally coupled regions across the cerebral cortex. The results revealed local networks confined to sensory and motor cortices as well as distributed networks of association regions. Within the sensory and motor cortices, functional connectivity followed topographic representations across adjacent areas. In association cortex, the connectivity patterns often showed abrupt transitions between network boundaries. Focused analyses were performed to better understand properties of network connectivity. A canonical sensory-motor pathway involving primary visual area, putative middle temporal area complex (MT+), lateral intraparietal area, and frontal eye field was analyzed to explore how interactions might arise within and between networks. Results showed that adjacent regions of the MT+ complex demonstrate differential connectivity consistent with a hierarchical pathway that spans networks. The functional connectivity of parietal and prefrontal association cortices was next explored. Distinct connectivity profiles of neighboring regions suggest they participate in distributed networks that, while showing evidence for interactions, are embedded within largely parallel, interdigitated circuits. We conclude by discussing the organization of these large-scale cerebral networks in relation to monkey anatomy and their potential evolutionary expansion in humans to support cognition.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction.

              Several properties of the cerebral cortex, including its columnar and laminar organization, as well as the topographic organization of cortical areas, can only be properly understood in the context of the intrinsic two-dimensional structure of the cortical surface. In order to study such cortical properties in humans, it is necessary to obtain an accurate and explicit representation of the cortical surface in individual subjects. Here we describe a set of automated procedures for obtaining accurate reconstructions of the cortical surface, which have been applied to data from more than 100 subjects, requiring little or no manual intervention. Automated routines for unfolding and flattening the cortical surface are described in a companion paper. These procedures allow for the routine use of cortical surface-based analysis and visualization methods in functional brain imaging. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Reviewing Editor
                Role: Senior Editor
                Journal
                eLife
                Elife
                eLife
                eLife
                eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
                2050-084X
                13 March 2023
                2023
                : 12
                : e85082
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre ( https://ror.org/05wg1m734) Nijmegen Netherlands
                [2 ] Donders Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen ( https://ror.org/016xsfp80) Nijmegen Netherlands
                [3 ] Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor ( https://ror.org/00jmfr291) Ann Arbor United States
                [4 ] Department of Psychology, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor ( https://ror.org/00jmfr291) Ann Arbor United States
                [5 ] Department of Philosophy, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor ( https://ror.org/00jmfr291) Ann Arbor United States
                [6 ] Center for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department for Clinical Neuroscience, Welcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Oxford University ( https://ror.org/052gg0110) Oxford United Kingdom
                [7 ] Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre ( https://ror.org/05wg1m734) Nijmegen Netherlands
                National Institute of Mental Health ( https://ror.org/04xeg9z08) United States
                National Institute of Mental Health ( https://ror.org/04xeg9z08) United States
                National Institute of Mental Health ( https://ror.org/04xeg9z08) United States
                National Institute of Mental Health ( https://ror.org/04xeg9z08) United States
                Yale ( https://ror.org/03v76x132) United States
                University Hospital of Lausanne ( https://ror.org/05a353079) Switzerland
                Author notes
                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3006-9044
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9025-6453
                Article
                85082
                10.7554/eLife.85082
                10036120
                36912775
                ad5ad609-eb8c-48a4-9449-8e5249cff9e3
                © 2023, Rutherford et al

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 28 November 2022
                : 10 March 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000781, European Research Council;
                Award ID: 10100118
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004440, Wellcome Trust;
                Award ID: 215698/Z/19/Z
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004440, Wellcome Trust;
                Award ID: 098369/Z/12/Z
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000025, National Institute of Mental Health;
                Award ID: R01MH122491
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000025, National Institute of Mental Health;
                Award ID: R01MH123458
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000025, National Institute of Mental Health;
                Award ID: R01MH130348
                Award Recipient :
                The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication. For the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.
                Categories
                Research Advance
                Neuroscience
                Custom metadata
                A brain chart database, containing functional and structural normative models, was tested to compare normative modeling features to raw features across three benchmarking tasks including group difference testing, classification, and regression.

                Life sciences
                brain charts,individual prediction,heterogeneity,functional neuroimaging,machine learning,computational psychiatry,human

                Comments

                Comment on this article