1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Identifying weaknesses in national health emergency response skills and techniques with emergency responders: A cross-sectional study from China

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          • After decades of investment in public health emergency response system in terms of infrastructure, equipment, inter-organizational communication and other areas, China has claimed that a sound public health emergency response system was established. Despite this, lack of qualified front-line staff that equipped with sufficient knowledge and emergency response skills has crippled the efficient action of emergency response. Although this problem is grave, there is paucity of studies in China exploring this issue.

          • This study identified the weakest skill areas perceived by participants among key skills highly demanded during public health emergency response.

          • Totally fourteen key emergency response skills and techniques were highlighted by responders. The five top weakest skill deficiency areas to be addressed were as follows: field epidemiological investigation skills, personal protective skills, nuclear and radioactive emergency handling skills, psychological intervention skills and risk assessment skills.

          • Major obstacles hindering the efficient promotion and mastery of those key skills among front-line emergency responders were as follows: insufficient funding of technical application, lack of operability, disqualified training and drills, delays in skill updating.

          • Determinants associated with the self-rated overall skill proficiency of public health emergency responders were explored: the multivariate logistic regression revealed personal protective skills as the most important factor contributing to self-rated overall skill proficiency of public health emergency responders (OR = 2.171), then field epidemiological investigation skills (OR = 1.510). Followed by emergency preparedness plan skills, coping with emergency drills, crisis communication skills, besides, field sampling skills and the professional title.

          Abstract

          Background

          To identify the weakest skill areas perceived by participants among key skills highly demanded during emergencies and to explore factors influencing the self-rated overall skill proficiency of public health emergency responders.

          Methods

          The participants were selected by a multistage, stratified cluster sampling method in Heilongjiang CDC to complete questionnaires that assessed their perceptions of health emergency response skills and techniques. A final sample of 1,740 staff members was obtained and analyzed.

          Results

          The 5 top skill deficiency areas perceived by participants were field epidemiologic investigation, personal protection, effective nuclear and radioactive response as well as psychological interventio (for these two areas gain the equal score), and risk assessment. The logistic regression revealed personal protective skills as the most important factor contributing to the self-rated overall skill proficiency of public health emergency responders, followed by field epidemiologic investigation skills.

          Conclusions

          More attention should be given to emergency response skill training and education programs. Major obstacles hindering the promotion of key skills and techniques among front-line emergency responders should be addressed urgently. Continuous efforts should be made to remove the financial, technical, and resource obstacles to improve public health emergency response capacity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Communicating with the public during health crises: experts' experiences and opinions

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Personal Protective Equipment: Protecting Health Care Providers in an Ebola Outbreak

            Purpose The recent Ebola epidemic that devastated West Africa has infected and killed more health care providers than any other outbreak in the history of this virus. An improved understanding of pathogen transmission and the institution of strategies to protect health care providers against infection are needed in infectious disease outbreaks. This review connects what is known about Ebola virus transmission with personal protective equipment (PPE) designed to arrest nosocomial transmission. Methods Articles pertaining to filovirus transmission and PPE in filovirus outbreaks were reviewed and findings are presented. In addition, studies that evaluated PPE and donning and doffing strategies are presented. Findings PPE is one step in a comprehensive infection prevention and control strategy that is required to protect health care providers. Given that the Ebola virus is primarily transmitted through direct contact of mucous membranes and cuts in the skin with infected patients and/or their bodily fluids, it is necessary to cover these potential portals of infection with PPE as part of a structured and instructed donning and doffing procedure. Implications Current recommendations about PPE and the donning and doffing processes are based on anecdotal experience. However, the use of non-human viruses can help provide evidence-based guidelines on both PPE and donning and doffing processes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Lessons learned: protection of healthcare workers from infectious disease risks.

              To summarize current concepts on preventing occupationally acquired infections in healthcare workers. Review of the pertinent medical literature. Focus on healthcare workers practicing in acute care hospitals, especially intensive care units. Healthcare workers. Key components of an effective infection control program include the following: 1) pre-exposure immunization with vaccines to prevent mumps, measles, rubella, varicella, pertussis, hepatitis B, and viral influenza; 2) adherence to standard precautions when providing patient care, especially the performance of hand hygiene before and after patient care; 3) rapid evaluation and initiation of appropriate isolation precautions for patients with potentially communicable diseases; 4) proper use of personal protective equipment such as masks, N95 respirators, eye protection, and gowns when caring for patients with potentially communicable diseases; and 5) evaluation of personnel with exposure to communicable diseases for receipt of postexposure prophylaxis. Risks of acquisition of infectious diseases by healthcare workers can be minimized by adherence to current infection control guidelines.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Am J Infect Control
                Am J Infect Control
                American Journal of Infection Control
                Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc.
                0196-6553
                1527-3296
                2 November 2016
                1 January 2017
                2 November 2016
                : 45
                : 1
                : e1-e6
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China
                [b ]Collaborative Innovation Centre of Social Risks Governance in Health, Subcenter of Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China
                [c ]School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                Author notes
                [* ]Address correspondence to Qunhong Wu, MD or Yanhua Hao, MD, Department of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, 157 Baojian Rd, Nangang District, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150086, China. (Q. Wu); (Y. Hao). wuqunhong@ 123456163.com hyhyjw@ 123456126.com
                Article
                S0196-6553(16)30922-1
                10.1016/j.ajic.2016.10.001
                7115265
                27814923
                acd6dcd0-ef2d-487e-b8ca-ac4edd25604f
                © 2017 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                public health emergency,chinese centers for disease control and prevention

                Comments

                Comment on this article