Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Global Anticoagulant Sales: A Cross-Sectional Analysis Across 39 Countries

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been associated with important changes in the use of anticoagulants, including (1) the recommendation of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or fondaparinux to prevent thrombotic complications associated with COVID [1–3], and the increased use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in atrial fibrillation to prevent exposure to healthcare facilities for blood monitoring required with warfarin. We quantified the change in global sales of anticoagulant agents after the COVID-19 pandemic declaration in March 2020. MIDAS® data for August 2014–August 2020 were obtained from IQVIA [4], which contains retail and hospital drug purchase data for 39 countries. We extracted records for anticoagulants, including injectable anticoagulants (heparins and LMWH), vitamin K antagonists, and DOACs. For each month and country, we calculated the number of units sold per 1000 population, and we conducted interrupted time-series analyses to examine changes in the trend of sales after the pandemic declaration in March 2020. Regression models included a continuous variable for month, an indicator variable for the period after March 2020, the interaction between them, and an indicator variable for developing countries. To quantify country-level variation, we calculated the proportion change in the number of units sold in March–August 2020 versus March–August 2019. Due to the instability of estimates for smaller countries, we constrained these analyses of variation in units for March–August 2020 versus March–August 2019 to countries with a population of at least 20 million (n = 17 countries). Before 2020, sales of anticoagulants increased by an annual average of 6%, driven by an annual average increase in sales of DOACs of 26%. Sales of vitamin K antagonists decreased by an annual average of 8%, and sales of injectable anticoagulants remained constant (Fig. 1). After the pandemic declaration in March 2020, there was a significant increase in sales of all anticoagulant products (p-value for level change = 0.006) and DOACs (p-value for level change = 0.019). Global sales of injectable products remained constant, while sales of vitamin K antagonists increased after the pandemic declaration, but the change was not significant (p = 0.133). Fig. 1 Trends in anticoagulant sales, August 2014–August 2020 On average, countries purchased 11% more anticoagulant units in March–August 2020 than in March–August 2019 (Fig. 2). Russia and Mexico had the largest increases in sales of anticoagulant products, with increases of 39% and 40%, respectively. The UK was the only country with a decrease in sales of anticoagulant products (− 2%). Country-level variation in changes in anticoagulant sales was particularly large for injectable products. While global sales of injectable anticoagulants were lower in March–August 2020 than in March–August 2019, five countries increased their demand, most remarkably Australia (55%), Russia (42%), and Mexico (34%). Russia and Mexico also presented the greatest increases in purchases of DOACs (73% and 43%, respectively), while the US had the largest decrease in purchases of injectable anticoagulants (− 22%). Fig. 2 Country-level variation in change in units March–August 2020 versus March–August 2019. The figure represents the proportion change between the number of units sold per 1000 in March–August 2020 and March–August 2019 at the country level. The lines represent median and interquartile range. Analyses were performed for the subset of countries with a population of at least 20 million (n = 17), including China, India, US, Brazil, Russia, Japan, Mexico, the Philippines, Germany, Turkey, the UK, France, Italy, Spain, Poland, Australia, and Canada. Countries excluded, with a population of < 20 million included Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Lithuania, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Sweden, Switzerland and Tunisia. DOACs direct oral anticoagulants Our paper is subject to four main limitations. First, we did not include fondaparinux in analyses because of missing data for some countries. Second, because we did not have access to drug utilization data, it is possible that changes in purchases of anticoagulants did not translate into changes in their clinical use. Additionally, it is unclear what indications anticoagulants were used for. Third, we used March 2020 as the start of the pandemic period, even though the pandemic peak did not happen simultaneously for all countries. Fourth, our analyses included countries with widely different healthcare systems, where changes in purchases of anticoagulants may not similarly translate into changes in their use. Nevertheless, our study is an important contribution to the literature on the impact of COVID on the demand for medications. Sales of DOACs presented a significant increase in March 2020, which could reflect patients’ tendency to hoard medications in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic for chronic indications of anticoagulants or switches from warfarin to DOACs to avoid exposing patients to healthcare facilities for blood testing. Although injectable anticoagulants have been recommended to prevent thrombotic complications in hospitalized COVID-19 patients since May 2020, global sales remained constant through August 2020. Only a few countries increased demand for these agents, most remarkably Australia, Russia, and Mexico. Interestingly, the US presented the strongest decrease in purchases of injectable anticoagulants. This could reflect the marked decrease in non-COVID-19 hospital admissions observed in the US following the pandemic outbreak [5], or the long periods with postponed elective procedures, for which injectable anticoagulants are often recommended. Additionally, country-level variation in purchases of injectable anticoagulants could be due to variability in national and institutional stockpile reserves and in the implementation of policies in response to COVID. For example, in January 2020, Russia released special rules for the import, pricing, and distribution of pharmaceutical products [6], which could partially explain the high increase in anticoagulant purchases observed. Finally, international variability in purchases of anticoagulants could represent differential speed in the uptake of new scientific evidence and guideline recommendations on COVID-19 treatments. Future research using patient-level data should examine to what extent the decrease in purchases of injectable anticoagulants observed in the US was due to the decrease in demand for inpatient care for non-COVID-19 conditions versus a delay in the use of oral anticoagulants to prevent thrombotic complications associated with COVID-19.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Scientific and Standardization Committee Communication: Clinical Guidance on the Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Patients with COVID‐19

          Abstract The novel coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic, as declared by the World Health Organization, is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV2). Cardiovascular disease and, in particular, venous thromboembolism (VTE) has emerged as an important consideration in the management of hospitalized patients with COVID‐19. The diagnosis of VTE using standardized objective testing is problematic in these patients, given the risk of infecting non‐COVID‐19 hospitalized patients and hospital personnel, coupled with the usual challenges of performing diagnostic testing in critically‐ill patients. Early reports suggest a high incidence of VTE in hospitalized COVID‐19 patients, particularly those with severe illness, that is similar to the high VTE rates observed in patients with other viral pneumonias, including severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS‐CoV).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prevention, diagnosis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report

            Abstract: Background Emerging evidence shows that severe COVID-19 can be complicated by a significant coagulopathy, that likely manifests in the form of both microthrombosis and venous thromboembolism (VTE). This recognition has led to the urgent need for practical guidance regarding prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of VTE. Methods A group of approved panelists developed key clinical questions by using the PICO (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome) format that addressed urgent clinical questions regarding the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19. MEDLINE (via PubMed or Ovid), Embase and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials were systematically searched for relevant literature and references were screened for inclusion. Validated evaluation tools were used to grade the level of evidence to support each recommendation. When evidence did not exist, guidance was developed based on consensus using the modified Delphi process. Results The systematic review and critical analysis of the literature based on13 PICO questions resulted in 22 statements. Very little evidence exists in the COVID-19 population. The panel thus used expert consensus and existing evidence-based guidelines to craft the guidance statements. Conclusions The evidence on the optimal strategies to prevent, diagnose, and treat venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 is sparse, but rapidly evolving.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Diagnosis, Management, and Pathophysiology of Arterial and Venous Thrombosis in COVID-19

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                inh3@pitt.edu
                Journal
                Am J Cardiovasc Drugs
                Am J Cardiovasc Drugs
                American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                1175-3277
                1179-187X
                26 March 2021
                : 1-3
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.21925.3d, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9000, Department of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, School of Pharmacy, , University of Pittsburgh, ; 3609 Forbes Avenue, Room 103, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.417199.3, ISNI 0000 0004 0474 0188, Women’s College Hospital, ; Toronto, ON Canada
                [3 ]GRID grid.21925.3d, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9000, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, , University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, ; Pittsburgh, PA USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.15276.37, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8091, Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, , University of Florida College of Pharmacy, ; Gainesville, FL USA
                [5 ]GRID grid.21925.3d, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9000, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, , University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, ; Pittsburgh, PA USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0118-4986
                Article
                475
                10.1007/s40256-021-00475-9
                7994109
                33768423
                acd6b28d-f024-4ea4-8d7d-2abdc7f5b984
                © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 6 March 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000050, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute;
                Award ID: K01HL142847
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Letter

                Comments

                Comment on this article