36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Measuring professional stigma towards patients with a forensic mental health status: protocol for a Delphi consensus study on the design of a questionnaire

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Negative attitudes towards individuals with a mental illness and/or criminal background are widely studied, but empirical interest in the attitudes towards patients with a forensic mental health status is lacking. Negative attitudes among mental healthcare (MHC) professionals can have a significant impact on treatment outcomes and hence, affect patients’ rehabilitation. This study will elaborate an instrument to assess stigmatising attitudes among community MHC professionals towards patients with a forensic mental health status.

          Methods and analysis

          The instrument will be developed by means of a Delphi study and depart from pre-existing instruments that assess public and professional stigma towards individuals with a mental illness and/or criminal background. Relevant instruments were identified through a targeted literature review. A longlist of items has been selected for the Delphi survey. Five expert panels (ie, academic experience in stigma or forensic MHC, clinical experience in community or forensic MHC or patient experience in forensic and community MHC) will be asked to score the relevance of each item on a 7-point Likert scale and to agree on the wording (yes/no). Participants will be provided with the option to suggest additional items or alternative wording. Adapted Delphi methodology will be applied with an expectation of at least three rounds to achieve consensus: ≥60% of the participants of at least four of five expert panels rank the item in the top three (inclusion) or bottom three (exclusion). Items will be reworded for a consecutive round based on a ‘yes minus no’ score and participants’ suggestions.

          Ethics and dissemination

          This study has been approved by the ethics committee of Fundación Sant Joan de Déu. Dissemination of results will be through peer-reviewed publications, presentations and (inter-)national academic conferences. A summary of the results will be shared with the participants and key persons in community and forensic MHC.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Conceptualizing Stigma

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique.

              Consensus methods such as the Delphi survey technique are being employed to help enhance effective decision-making in health and social care. The Delphi survey is a group facilitation technique, which is an iterative multistage process, designed to transform opinion into group consensus. It is a flexible approach, that is used commonly within the health and social sciences, yet little guidance exists to help researchers undertake this method of data collection. This paper aims to provide an understanding of the preparation, action steps and difficulties that are inherent within the Delphi. Used systematically and rigorously, the Delphi can contribute significantly to broadening knowledge within the nursing profession. However, careful thought must be given before using the method; there are key issues surrounding problem identification, researcher skills and data presentation that must be addressed. The paper does not claim to be definitive; it purports to act as a guide for those researchers who wish to exploit the Delphi methodology.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2022
                1 September 2022
                : 12
                : 9
                : e061160
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentResearch, Teaching and Innovation Unit , Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu , Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
                [2 ]Centre for Biomedical Research on Mental Health (CIBERSAM) , Madrid, Spain
                [3 ]departmentDepartment of Medicine and Translational Research , University of Barcelona , Barcelona, Spain
                [4 ]Sant Joan de Déu Research Institute , Barcelona, Spain
                [5 ]departmentPenitentiary Psychiatric Hospitalization Unit of Catalonia , Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu , Sant Esteve Sesrovires, Barcelona, Spain
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Ellen Vorstenbosch; ellen.vorstenbosch@ 123456sjd.es
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1054-6587
                Article
                bmjopen-2022-061160
                10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061160
                9438202
                acd405b1-0065-4c36-bc54-891b5e5f2eab
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 01 February 2022
                : 08 August 2022
                Categories
                Mental Health
                1506
                1712
                Protocol
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                forensic psychiatry,mental health,medical education & training
                Medicine
                forensic psychiatry, mental health, medical education & training

                Comments

                Comment on this article