Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of timed dosing of usual antihypertensives according to patient chronotype on cardiovascular outcomes: the Chronotype sub-study cohort of the Treatment in Morning versus Evening (TIME) study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          Timing drug administration to endogenous circadian rhythms may enhance treatment efficacy. In the Chronotype sub-study of the Treatment in Morning versus Evening (TIME) clinical trial we examined whether timing of usual antihypertensive medications according to patient chronotype (a behavioural marker of personal circadian rhythm) may influence clinical cardiovascular outcomes.

          Methods

          This was a cohort sub-study of TIME, a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, UK clinical trial of morning versus evening dosing of usual antihypertensive medications and cardiovascular outcomes. On August 3rd, 2020, all active TIME participants were invited to complete a validated chronotype questionnaire. Chronotype was quantitatively assessed as the mid sleep time on free days corrected for sleep debt on workdays (MSFsc). We analysed associations between chronotype and antihypertensive dosing time and explored their combined effect on cardiovascular outcomes (a composite endpoint of hospitalisation for non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) or non-fatal stroke, and single components) using proportional hazard time-to-event models adjusted for baseline covariates. These were used to specifically test for interactions between dosing time and chronotype.

          Findings

          Between August 3, 2020, and March 31, 2021, 5358 TIME participants completed the online questionnaire. 2778 were previously randomised to morning dosing and 2580 to evening dosing of their usual antihypertensives. Chronotype was symmetrically distributed around a median MSFsc of 3:07 am. The composite endpoint increased for later MSFsc (later chronotype) dosed in the morning but not in those dosed in the evening (hazard ratios 1.46 [95% CI 1.14–1.86] and 0.96 [95% CI 0.70–1.30] per hour of MSFsc, respectively; interaction p = 0.036). Later chronotype was associated with increased risk of hospitalisation for non-fatal MI in the morning dosing group, and reduced risk in the evening dosing group (hazard ratios 1.62 [95% CI 1.18–2.22] and 0.66 [95% CI 0.44–1.00] per hour of MSFsc, respectively; interaction p < 0.001). No interaction between chronotype and antihypertensive dosing time was observed for stroke events.

          Interpretation

          Alignment of dosing time of usual antihypertensives with personal chronotype could lower the incidence of non-fatal MI compared to a ‘misaligned’ dosing time regimen. Future studies are warranted to establish whether synchronizing administration time of antihypertensive therapy with individual chronotype reduces risk of MI.

          Funding

          The TIME study was funded by the doi 10.13039/501100000274, British Heart Foundation; (CS/14/1/30659) with support from the British and Irish Hypertension Society.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms.

          An English language self-assessment Morningness-Eveningness questionnaire is presented and evaluated against individual differences in the circadian vatiation of oral temperature. 48 subjects falling into Morning, Evening and Intermediate type categories regularly took their temperature. Circadian peak time were identified from the smoothed temperature curves of each subject. Results showed that Morning types and a significantly earlier peak time than Evening types and tended to have a higher daytime temperature and lower post peak temperature. The Intermediate type had temperatures between those of the other groups. Although no significant differences in sleep lengths were found between the three types, Morning types retired and arose significantly earlier than Evening types. Whilst these time significatly correlated with peak time, the questionnaire showed a higher peak time correlation. Although sleep habits are an important déterminant of peak time there are other contibutory factors, and these appear to be partly covered by the questionnaire. Although the questionnaire appears to be valid, further evaluation using a wider subject population is required.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use

            Background Sex and gender differences are often overlooked in research design, study implementation and scientific reporting, as well as in general science communication. This oversight limits the generalizability of research findings and their applicability to clinical practice, in particular for women but also for men. This article describes the rationale for an international set of guidelines to encourage a more systematic approach to the reporting of sex and gender in research across disciplines. Methods A panel of 13 experts representing nine countries developed the guidelines through a series of teleconferences, conference presentations and a 2-day workshop. An internet survey of 716 journal editors, scientists and other members of the international publishing community was conducted as well as a literature search on sex and gender policies in scientific publishing. Results The Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines are a comprehensive procedure for reporting of sex and gender information in study design, data analyses, results and interpretation of findings. Conclusions The SAGER guidelines are designed primarily to guide authors in preparing their manuscripts, but they are also useful for editors, as gatekeepers of science, to integrate assessment of sex and gender into all manuscripts as an integral part of the editorial process.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              2023 ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension Endorsed by the European Renal Association (ERA) and the International Society of Hypertension (ISH)

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                eClinicalMedicine
                EClinicalMedicine
                eClinicalMedicine
                Elsevier
                2589-5370
                14 May 2024
                June 2024
                14 May 2024
                : 72
                : 102633
                Affiliations
                [a ]MEMO Research, Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, UK
                [b ]Metabolic Physiology, Institute for Diabetes and Cancer, Helmholtz Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, and German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
                [c ]University of Colorado at Boulder, Colorado, USA
                [d ]University of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Sleep Health & Society Programme, Coventry, UK
                [e ]University Strategic Center for Studies on Gender Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. MEMO Research, Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. f.pigazzani@ 123456dundee.ac.uk
                [∗∗ ]Corresponding author. Metabolic Physiology, Institute for Diabetes and Cancer, Helmholtz Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany. kenneth.dyar@ 123456helmholtz-munich.de
                [f]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Article
                S2589-5370(24)00212-8 102633
                10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102633
                11106533
                38774676
                ac95f63a-6df2-47d1-9759-961b0298baac
                © 2024 The Author(s)

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 30 December 2023
                : 19 April 2024
                : 23 April 2024
                Categories
                Articles

                personalised chronotherapy,hypertension,chronotype,cardiovascular outcomes,dosing time,antihypertensive

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content200

                Cited by2

                Most referenced authors533