13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Rare Complications of Cervical Spine Surgery: Horner’s Syndrome

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Study Design:

          A multicenter retrospective case series.

          Objective:

          Horner’s syndrome is a known complication of anterior cervical spinal surgery, but it is rarely encountered in clinical practice. To better understand the incidence, risks, and neurologic outcomes associated with Horner’s syndrome, a multicenter study was performed to review a large collective experience with this rare complication.

          Methods:

          We conducted a retrospective multicenter case series study involving 21 high-volume surgical centers from the AOSpine North America Clinical Research Network. Medical records for 17 625 patients who received subaxial cervical spine surgery from 2005 to 2011 were reviewed to identify occurrence of 21 predefined treatment complications. Descriptive statistics were provided for baseline patient characteristics. Paired t test was used to analyze changes in clinical outcomes at follow-up compared to preoperative status.

          Results:

          In total, 8887 patients who underwent anterior cervical spine surgery at the participating institutions were screened. Postoperative Horner’s syndrome was identified in 5 (0.06%) patients. All patients experienced the complication following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. The sympathetic trunk appeared to be more vulnerable when operating on midcervical levels (C5, C6), and most patients experienced at least a partial recovery without further treatment.

          Conclusions:

          This collective experience suggests that Horner’s syndrome is an exceedingly rare complication following anterior cervical spine surgery. Injury to the sympathetic trunk may be limited by maintaining a midline surgical trajectory when possible, and performing careful dissection and retraction of the longus colli muscle when lateral exposure is necessary, especially at caudal cervical levels.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Surgical complications of anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion for cervical degenerative disk disease: a single surgeon's experience of 1,576 patients.

          Although anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a safe and effective procedure, the complications associated with it cannot be underestimated. The aim of this study was to highlight the potential complications associated with ACDF and the strategies to avoid them.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            On the incidence, cause, and prevention of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsies during anterior cervical spine surgery.

            A retrospective review of contemporaneously acquired clinical data supplemented by experimental cadaver dissection. To establish the incidence and mechanism of vocal cord paralysis after anterior cervical spine surgery and to determine whether controlling for endotracheal tube (ET)-laryngeal wall interactions induced by the cervical retraction system could decrease the rate of paralysis. Vocal cord paralysis is the most common otolaryngologic complication after anterior cervical spine surgery. However, the quoted frequency of this varies considerably, and the cause of the injury is not clearly defined. As a result, various, and at times contradictory, recommendations to prevent this are presented without data to support their effectiveness. Data gathered at the time of surgery and during follow-up visits on 900 consecutive patients who underwent anterior cervical spine surgery with plating during a 12-year interval were entered into a computerized database and reviewed for complications and procedural risk factors. After the first 250 cases an intervention consisting of monitoring ET cuff pressure and release of pressure after retractor replacement or repositioning was used, which allowed the ET to recenter within the larynx. The ET-laryngeal wall relation also was studied in fresh intubated cadavers using videofluoroscopic images, before and after retractor placement. Thirty incidences of vocal cord paralysis consistent with recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury were identified: 27 temporary and 3 permanent. The rate of temporary paralysis decreased from 6.4% to 1.69% (P = 0.0002) after institution of the described maneuver. The findings confirmed that the retractor displaced the larynx against the shaft of the ET, allowing impingement on the vulnerable intralaryngeal segment of the RLN. The most common cause of vocal cord paralysis after anterior cervical spine surgery is compression of the RLN within the endolarynx. Monitoring of ET cuff pressure and release after retractor placement may prevent injury to the RLN during anterior cervical spine surgery.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Surgical anatomy of the cervical sympathetic trunk.

              Lack of knowledge of the anatomy of the cervical sympathetic trunk (CST) may complicate surgical procedures on the cervical spine. This study aims to define linear and angular relations of the CST with respect to consistent structures around it, including the number and size of the cervical ganglia, the distances between the CST and the longus colli muscle and the anterior tubercles of the transverse processes of cervical vertebrae. Morphometric parameters of the 24 CSTs of 12 adults were measured on both sides. The CST had superior, middle, and inferior (or cervicothoracic) ganglia in 20.8% of specimens; superior and inferior (or cervicothoracic) ganglia in 45.8%; superior, middle, vertebral, inferior, or cervicothoracic ganglia in 12.5%, and superior, vertebral, inferior or cervicothoracic ganglia in 20.8% of specimens. The superior ganglion was observed in all specimens, the middle ganglion and vertebral ganglion were each observed in 33.3%. There was no difference between the number of superior and vertebral ganglia between the right and left sides. The average distance between the CST and the medial border of the ipsilateral longus colli muscle (LCM) was 17.2 mm at C3 and 12.4 mm at C7. As the CSTs converged caudally, the LCMs diverged. The average distance between the anterior tubercles of transverse processes of the cervical vertebrae and the lateral borders of the ipsilateral CST was 3.4 mm at C4, 3.2 mm at C5, and 3.9 mm at C6. The presence of a vertebral ganglion and variations, such as the localization of the CST within the carotid sheath, are important. The anatomical landmarks described should assist the spinal surgeon to avoid injury of the CST. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Global Spine J
                Global Spine J
                GSJ
                spgsj
                Global Spine Journal
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                2192-5682
                2192-5690
                1 April 2017
                April 2017
                : 7
                : 1 Suppl , Special Issue: Rare Complications of Cervical Spine Surgery
                : 103S-108S
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
                [2 ]Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
                [3 ]University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
                [4 ]University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
                [5 ]Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
                [6 ]Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
                [7 ]Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
                [8 ]Springfield Clinic, LLP, Springfield, IL, USA
                [9 ]Southern Illinois University, Springfield, IL, USA
                [10 ]Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA
                [11 ]University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
                [12 ]Medstar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
                [13 ]Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
                [14 ]Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
                [15 ]Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [16 ]Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
                [17 ]Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
                [18 ]New York-Presbyterian/The Allen Hospital, New York, NY, USA
                Author notes
                [*]Vincent C. Traynelis, Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W Harrison St, Ste 855, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. Email: vincent_traynelis@ 123456rush.edu
                Article
                10.1177_2192568216688184
                10.1177/2192568216688184
                5400192
                28451480
                ac8b4049-2a94-4afe-a5fe-c2c60c778c6f
                © The Author(s) 2017

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License ( http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Categories
                Articles

                horner’s syndrome,rare complications,cervical spine,anterior approach

                Comments

                Comment on this article