6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      To submit to Bentham Journals, please click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of ER: YAG Laser Treatment on the Bond Strength of Self-adhesive Resin Cements on Contaminated and Non-contaminated Dentin Surface

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Nowadays, lasers are used to modify the surface of dentin and enamel and improve the surface bond with resin cement while contamination weakens this bond.

          Objective

          This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different contamination types on the microshear bond strength (μSBS) of two self-adhesive resin cements to dentin with/without laser treatment.

          Methods

          One-hundred and twenty molar teeth were prepared and randomly divided into three groups: blood, saliva, and control. In the blood group, blood was applied to the samples for 10 seconds; in the saliva group, saliva was applied to the samples for 10 seconds; and in the control group, distilled water was applied to the samples. Each group was further divided into two subgroups; in one, the Er: YAG laser was applied to samples for 5 seconds, and in the other, no laser treatment was performed. Next, TheraCem and Embrace WetBond cements were placed on each sample. μSBS was measured using a universal testing machine.

          Results

          In Embrace WetBond, μSBS was not affected by contamination type regardless of laser treatment. In TheraCem, μSBS was not affected by contamination type when the laser was not used. In contrast, with laser treatment, blood contamination decreased μSBS compared to control and saliva. After laser treatment in the presence of blood, μSBS of Embrace WetBond was significantly higher than that of TheraCem, while without laser treatment, no significant difference was observed between the two cements.

          Conclusion

          Dentin conditioning with an erbium laser can increase the cement bond strength to dentin if proper isolation is achievable. If proper isolation cannot be obtained, dentin conditioning with erbium laser followed by application of Embrace WetBond cement can increase the microshear bond strength of cement to dentin.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dental Cements for Luting and Bonding Restorations

          Self-adhesive resin cements combine easy application of conventional luting materials with improved mechanical properties and bonding capability of resin cements. The presence of functional acidic monomers, dual cure setting mechanism, and fillers capable of neutralizing the initial low pH of the cement are essential elements of the material and should be understood when selecting the ideal luting material for each clinical situation. This article addresses the most relevant aspects of self-adhesive resin cements and their potential impact on clinical performance. Although few clinical studies are available to establish solid clinical evidence, the information presented provides clinical guidance in the dynamic environment of material development.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Bacterial adhesion to biomaterials: What regulates this attachment? A review

            • Bacterial adhesion to the surface of dental materials play a significant role in infections. • The factors that govern microbial attachment involves different types of physical-chemical interactions and biological processes. • Studying bacterial adhesion makes it possible to understand the mechanisms involved in attachment and helps in the search for technologies that promote antibacterial surfaces. Bacterial attachment to biomaterials is of great interest to the medical and dental field due to its impact on dental implants, dental prostheses, and others, leading to the need to introduce methods for biofilm control and mitigation of infections. Biofilm adhesion is a multifactorial process and involves characteristics relevant to the bacterial cell as well as biological, chemical, and physical properties relative to the surface of biomaterials. Bacteria encountered different environmental conditions during their growth and developed interspecies communication strategies, as well as various mechanisms to detect the environment and facilitate survival, such as chemical sensors or physical detection mechanisms. However, the factors that govern microbial attachment to surfaces are not yet fully understood. In order to understand how bacteria interact with surfaces, as well as to characterize the physical-chemical properties of bacteria adhesins, and to determine their interrelation with the adhesion to the substrate, in recent years new techniques of atomic force microscopy (AFM) have been developed and helped by providing quantitative results. Thus, the purpose of this review is to gather current studies about the factors that regulate microbial adhesion to surfaces in order to offer a guide to studies to obtain technologies that provide an antimicrobial surface.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Saliva contamination and bond strength of single-bottle adhesives to enamel and dentin.

              To determine and compare the shear bond strength of four single-bottle adhesives to enamel and dentin contaminated with human saliva. Prime & Bond 2.1, One Step, Tenure Quik and Syntac Single Component were evaluated. Ninety-six sound molars were divided into three subgroups for each of the four adhesives. Small flat areas on the buccal and lingual surfaces were ground in enamel. Small flat areas on the mesial and distal surfaces were ground on the middle dentin of the same teeth. Each adhesive was tested under: uncontaminated conditions (Group 1), contamination of the bonding surface with fresh whole saliva for 20 seconds and removing the excess with cotton pellets (Group 2), and contamination of the bonding surface with fresh whole saliva for 20 seconds and rinsing the saliva for 20 seconds before adhesive application (Group 3). After adhesive application, a plastic mold was filled with composite, applied to the bonding surface and light-cured. The teeth were thermocycled (1,000 cycles) and sheared using an Instron testing machine. The results were analyzed using a three-way ANOVA. Saliva contamination of enamel or dentin did not affect the shear bond strength of the adhesives tested except for Syntac SC with contaminated dried enamel. One Step displayed similar bond strengths to both enamel and dentin; P & B 2.1, Tenure Q and Syntac SC displayed higher bond strength to enamel than to dentin. P & B 2.1 showed significantly higher bond strengths to enamel than the other adhesives, but there was no significant difference for dentin bond strength under the uncontaminated condition.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                TODENTJ
                Open Dent J
                The Open Dentistry Journal
                Open Dent. J.
                Bentham Science Publishers
                1874-2106
                26 October 2023
                2023
                : 17
                : e187421062309190
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Dental Research Center, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                [2 ]Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
                [3 ]Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                Author notes
                [* ]Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, North Kargar St., Tehran 14174, Iran; Tel: +98 21 8801 5950; E-mail: Valizadeh.sara@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                e187421062309190
                10.2174/0118742106248637230922095805
                ac8afa7a-bbd2-4fee-bf04-4d0ef5629b94
                © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 23 February 2023
                : 23 August 2023
                : 29 August 2023
                Categories
                Medicine

                Medicine,Chemistry,Life sciences
                Resin cement,Laser treatment,Dentin,Erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser,Luting agent,Ceramic restorations

                Comments

                Comment on this article