Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Safety and Effectiveness of a Biosimilar Recombinant Human Growth Hormone in Children Requiring Growth Hormone Treatment: Analysis of Final Data from PATRO Children, an International, Post-Marketing Surveillance Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Omnitrope ® (somatropin) was approved as a biosimilar recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) in 2006. Here, we report final data from the PAtients TReated with Omnitrope ® (PATRO) Children study, a post-marketing surveillance study designed to monitor the long-term safety and effectiveness of this treatment in pediatric patients.

          Methods

          The study population included all pediatric patients treated with Omnitrope ® (biosimilar rhGH), administered via daily injection, in routine clinical practice. The primary objective was to assess long-term safety, with effectiveness assessed as a secondary objective.

          Results

          In total, 7359 patients were enrolled and treated in the PATRO Children study; 86.0% were treatment-naïve at baseline. Growth hormone deficiency was the most frequent indication (57.9%), followed by patients born small for gestational age (SGA; 26.6%). The mean (SD) duration of exposure to biosimilar rhGH was 3.66 years (2.39). A total of 16,628 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 3981 (54.1%) patients, most of which were mild/moderate. AEs suspected to be treatment related occurred in 8.3% of patients, most frequently headache (1.6%), injection-site pain (1.1%), or injection-site hematoma (1.1%). The incidence rate (IR) of type 2 diabetes mellitus was 0.11 per 1000 person-years (PY) across all patients, and 0.13 per 1000 PY in patients born SGA. The IR of newly diagnosed primary malignancies was 0.22 per 1000 PY across all patients. In the 6589 patients included in the effectiveness population, a sustained catch-up growth was observed across all indications. After 5 years of treatment, height SDS increased from baseline by a median (range) of +1.79 (–3.7 to 6.2) in treatment-naïve patients and +0.73 (–1.4 to 3.7) in pretreated patients.

          Conclusion

          This final analysis of the PATRO Children study indicates that biosimilar rhGH is well tolerated and effective in real-world clinical practice. These data are consistent with the well-characterized safety profile of rhGH treatment in pediatric patients.

          Plain Language Summary

          Why was the study done?

          • Injections of growth hormone medicine can be used to increase height velocity in children with growth disorders.

          • It is important to monitor the safety of long-term growth hormone treatment, especially regarding the risk of cancer and diabetes.

          What did the researchers do?

          • PATRO Children was a study designed to look at the safety of using a growth hormone medicine for long periods of time.

          • This study included children with several different growth disorders who were treated with a growth hormone medicine called Omnitrope ®, which is administered via daily injections, and followed them throughout their treatment.

          • The researchers aimed to evaluate the risk of specific safety concerns in these patients, including cancer and diabetes.

          What did the researchers find?

          • A total of 7359 patients were enrolled from 304 sites around the world.

          • Overall, 8.3% of patients had an adverse reaction that was considered to be related to growth hormone treatment.

          • The most common adverse reaction considered related to growth hormone was headache, which occurred in 1.6% of patients.

          • The risk of developing diabetes and cancer was low and comparable to what has been seen in previous studies in patients treated with growth hormone, and in the general population.

          What do the findings mean?

          The adverse reactions seen in this study were consistent with the well-characterized safety profile of growth hormone treatment in pediatric patients. This supports previous studies showing growth hormone treatment is not associated with an increased risk of cancer or diabetes in children.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Growth hormone — past, present and future

          Growth hormone (GH) research and its clinical application for the treatment of growth disorders span more than a century. During the first half of the 20th century, clinical observations and anatomical and biochemical studies formed the basis of the understanding of the structure of GH and its various metabolic effects in animals. The following period (1958-1985), during which pituitary-derived human GH was used, generated a wealth of information on the regulation and physiological role of GH - in conjunction with insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) - and its use in children with GH deficiency (GHD). The following era (1985 to present) of molecular genetics, recombinant technology and the generation of genetically modified biological systems has expanded our understanding of the regulation and role of the GH-IGF axis. Today, recombinant human GH is used for the treatment of GHD and various conditions of non-GHD short stature and catabolic states; however, safety concerns still accompany this therapeutic approach. In the future, new therapeutics based on various components of the GH-IGF axis might be developed to further improve the treatment of such disorders. In this Review, we describe the history of GH research and clinical use with a particular focus on disorders in childhood.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Global estimates of incidence of type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Atlas, 10th edition

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effect of growth hormone (GH) treatment on the near-final height of 1258 patients with idiopathic GH deficiency: analysis of a large international database.

              Treatment with GH has been used to correct the growth deficit in children with GH deficiency (GHD). Although successful in increasing height velocity, such treatment often falls short of helping patients achieve full genetic height potential. This study set out to analyze near-final height (FH) data from a cohort of GH-treated children with idiopathic GHD. Of 1258 evaluable patients in the Pfizer International Growth Database (KIGS) with GHD, 980 were of Caucasian origin, and 278 were of Japanese origin; 747 had isolated GHD (IGHD), and 511 had multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies (MPHD). Near-FH, relation to midparental height, and factors predictive of growth outcomes were the main outcome measures. Median height sd scores (SDS) at the start of treatment were -2.4 (IGHD) and -2.9 (MPHD) for Caucasian males and -2.6 (IGHD) and -3.4 (MPHD) for females, respectively; comparable starting heights were -2.9 (IGHD) and -3.6 (MPHD) for Japanese males and -3.3 (IGHD) and -4.0 (MPHD) for females, respectively. Corresponding near-adult height SDS after GH treatment were -0.8 (IGHD) and -0.7 (MPHD) for Caucasian males and -1.0 (IGHD) and -1.1 (MPHD) for females, respectively; and -1.6 (IGHD) and -1.9 (MPHD) for Japanese males and -2.1 (IGHD) and -1.8 (MPHD) for females, respectively. Differences between near-adult height and midparental height ranged between -0.6 and +0.2 SDS for the various groups, with the closest approximation to MPH occurring in Japanese males with MPHD. The first-year increase in height SDS and prepubertal height gain was highly correlated with total height gain, confirming the importance of treatment before pubertal onset. It is possible to achieve FH within the midparental height range in patients with idiopathic GHD treated from an early age with GH, but absolute height outcomes remain in the lower part of the normal range. Patients with MPHD generally had a slightly better long-term height outcome.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Drug Des Devel Ther
                Drug Des Devel Ther
                dddt
                Drug Design, Development and Therapy
                Dove
                1177-8881
                02 March 2024
                2024
                : 18
                : 667-684
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Endocrinologia Pediatra e Centro, Screening Neonatale, Ospedale Pediatrico Microcitemico “A. Cao” , Cagliari, Italy
                [2 ]University Hospitals Sussex NHS Trust, Royal Alexandra Children’s Hospital , Brighton, UK
                [3 ]Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine , Cincinnati, OH, USA
                [4 ]Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Center , Freiburg, Germany
                [5 ]Servicio de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar , Cádiz, Spain
                [6 ]Departamento Materno Infantil y Radiología, Universidad de Cádiz , Cádiz, Spain
                [7 ]Instituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA) , Cádiz, Spain
                [8 ]HEXAL AG (a Sandoz company) , Holzkirchen, Germany
                [9 ]Novartis Sandoz Biopharmaceutical AG, c/o HEXAL AG , Basel, Switzerland
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Sandro Loche, Endocrinologia Pediatra e Centro, Screening Neonatale, Ospedale Pediatrico Microcitemico “A. Cao” , Via Jenner, 09121 Cagliari, Italy, Email sandroloche@libero.it
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4558-8533
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2398-9520
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8295-7364
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5861-6041
                http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6116-9895
                Article
                440009
                10.2147/DDDT.S440009
                10918591
                38454934
                ac7910bf-06dd-4af8-9848-af743c861b72
                © 2024 Loche et al.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 13 September 2023
                : 29 January 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 6, References: 32, Pages: 18
                Funding
                Funded by: HEXAL AG (a Sandoz company);
                The PATRO Children study was funded by HEXAL AG (a Sandoz company). HEXAL AG (a Sandoz company) was involved in all stages of the study, from design to submission of the paper for publication.
                Categories
                Original Research

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                omnitrope,patro children,growth hormone,pediatrics,growth hormone deficiency,small for gestational age

                Comments

                Comment on this article