4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      INSTRUMENTOS DE EVALUACIÓN EN LA FORMACIÓN DE COMPETENCIAS PROFESIONALES DE ESTUDIANTES UNIVERSITARIOS Translated title: ASSESSMENT TOOLS IN THE FORMATION OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCIES AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          RESUMEN La evaluación formativa se concibe como un factor esencial para mejorar el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje; el éxito de su implementación en las aulas universitarias radica en las herramientas para lograrlo. El objetivo de la presente investigación se relaciona con analizar los beneficios de la aplicación de instrumentos de evaluación en la formación de competencias profesionales de estudiantes universitarios, con base en artículos indexados en Scopus y Scielo. Además, se propuso revisar la percepción de los alumnos universitarios sobre la rúbrica y otros instrumentos de evaluación. Para ello, la metodología utilizada se basó en una revisión de literatura con la finalidad de analizar y sintetizar los resultados de las publicaciones seleccionadas. Los resultados evidencian que los instrumentos de evaluación mejoran el proceso evaluativo, el rendimiento académico y la adquisición de competencias profesionales. Asimismo, los universitarios se sintieron satisfechos hacia esta nueva modalidad de evaluación, y destacaron sus beneficios para la formación y posterior ejercicio profesional.

          Translated abstract

          ABSTRACT Formative assessment is conceived as an essential factor to improve the teaching and learning process. The success of its implementation in university classrooms lies in its assessment tools. In this context, this research aims to analyze the benefits of the application of assessment instruments in the formation of professional competencies among university students. To this end, a consultation of articles indexed in Scopus and Scielo was executed. The perception of university students on the rubric and other assessment instruments was also explored. The used methodology was based on a literature review so as to analyze and synthesize the results of the selected publications. The results show that the assessment instruments improve the evaluation process, academic performance, and the acquisition of professional competencies. Likewise, the university students were satisfied with this new assessment modality, highlighting the benefits thereof for both their training and subsequent professional practice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          Matthew Page and co-authors describe PRISMA 2020, an updated reporting guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World

            Nowadays, the importance of bibliographic databases (DBs) has increased enormously, as they are the main providers of publication metadata and bibliometric indicators universally used both for research assessment practices and for performing daily tasks. Because the reliability of these tasks firstly depends on the data source, all users of the DBs should be able to choose the most suitable one. Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus are the two main bibliographic DBs. The comprehensive evaluation of the DBs’ coverage is practically impossible without extensive bibliometric analyses or literature reviews, but most DBs users do not have bibliometric competence and/or are not willing to invest additional time for such evaluations. Apart from that, the convenience of the DB’s interface, performance, provided impact indicators and additional tools may also influence the users’ choice. The main goal of this work is to provide all of the potential users with an all-inclusive description of the two main bibliographic DBs by gathering the findings that are presented in the most recent literature and information provided by the owners of the DBs at one place. This overview should aid all stakeholders employing publication and citation data in selecting the most suitable DB.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              A Criteria-based Assessment of the Coverage of Scopus and Web of Science

              The purpose of this study is to assess the coverage of the scientific literature in Scopus and Web of Science from the perspective of research evaluation. The academic communities of Norway have agreed on certain criteria for what should be included as original research publications in research evaluation and funding contexts. These criteria have been applied since 2004 in a comprehensive bibliographic database called the Norwegian Science Index (NSI). The relative coverages of Scopus and Web of Science are compared with regard to publication type, field of research and language. Our results show that Scopus covers 72 percent of the total Norwegian scientific and scholarly publication output in 2015 and 2016, while the corresponding figure for Web of Science Core Collection is 69 percent. The coverages are most comprehensive in medicine and health (89 and 87 percent) and in the natural sciences and technology (85 and 84 percent). The social sciences (48 percent in Scopus and 40 percent in Web of Science Core Collection) and particularly the humanities (27 and 23 percent) are much less covered in the two international data sources. Comparing with data from only one country is a limitation of the study, but the criteria used to define a country’s scientific output as well as the identification of patterns of field-dependent partial representations in Scopus and Web of Science should be recognizable and useful also for other countries. The novelty of this study is the criteria-based approach to studying coverage problems in the two data sources.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                rchakin
                Revista Chakiñan de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades
                Revista Chakiñan
                Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo (Riobamba, Chimborazo, Ecuador )
                2550-6722
                April 2024
                : 22
                : 69-84
                Affiliations
                [2] Trujillo orgnameUniversidad Cesar Vallejo orgdiv1Escuela de postgrado Perú lperaltaro@ 123456ucvvirtual.edu.pe
                [1] Trujillo orgnameUniversidad Cesar Vallejo orgdiv1Escuela de postgrado Perú mbazanli@ 123456ucvvirtual.edu.pe
                [4] Trujillo orgnameUniversidad Cesar Vallejo orgdiv1Escuela de postgrado Perú mlunaa@ 123456ucvvirtual.edu.pe
                [3] Trujillo orgnameUniversidad Cesar Vallejo orgdiv1Escuela de postgrado Perú gportalm@ 123456ucvvirtual.edu.pe
                Article
                S2550-67222024000100069 S2550-6722(24)00002200069
                10.37135/chk.002.22.04
                ac671f4b-c0ca-49f2-899b-e491e45ed68f

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 07 June 2023
                : 13 September 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 66, Pages: 16
                Product

                SciELO null


                Desarrollo de competencias,formative evaluation,higher education,Development of competencies,técnica de evaluación,evaluación formativa,educación superior,assessment techniques

                Comments

                Comment on this article