23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact on mental health by “Living in Isolation and Quarantine” during COVID-19 pandemic

      letter

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Dear Editor, We read with great interest the recent article by Rohilla et al. published in your esteemed journal.[1] We would hereby like to add our perspective of mental health issues during COVID-19 era. The ongoing Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic by the novel strain SARS-CoV-2 has dragged the entire world to its feet leaving people scared and anxious. Starting in December 2019 from Wuhan, China, COVID-19 has spread like rapid fire to more than 200 countries.[2] As of July 20, 2020, worldwide there are 14,686,829 confirmed COVID-19 cases and 609,835 deaths.[3] COVID-19 is challenging not just for its medical phenomenon, but also for its capability to affect the financial, mental, emotional wellbeing of the individuals across the globe.[4 5] National agencies, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), World Health Organization (WHO), and many other organizations are promoting to follow non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) to combat the pandemic.[6] However, amidst the challenges of mitigating COVID-19, little has been known about the mental health impact of NPIs. There is significant evidence to suggest the importance of socialization and connectivity in maintaining a good mental wellbeing.[7] Social networking, community engagement, and participation have been shown to be associated with both physical and psychological well-being.[7 8] Detrimental effects on mental health are expected to arise with isolation, neglect, and loneliness. COVID-19 pandemic has multi-dimensional impact on our physical, mental, social, and emotional wellbeing.[8 9] Similar experience was reported during previous coronavirus pandemics, namely SARS and MERS pandemic.[10 11 12] Mental health issues like anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are some of the mental illnesses that are on rise ever since the COVID-19 pandemic started which needs immediate attention. Usually, people suffering from mental illnesses are advised to socialize as a part of therapy in most of the psychiatric illnesses. However, for containment of the COVID-19 pandemic, almost all countries are endorsing the concept of social distancing, quarantine, and isolation as the most effective strategies.[13] It has been a couple of months since many countries like India, Italy, Spain, France, etc., are on lockdown with citizens sheltering inside their own houses and following the social distancing protocols. With “restriction of movement” and “not socializing with each other” becoming a new normal lifestyle for most of us, mental vulnerability to conditions like anxiety and depression has been increasingly recognized. During previous outbreaks of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) outbreak, many studies confirmed that there were worsening mental illness symptoms in an individual with preexisting mental health conditions as well as healthy individuals. For example, in Hong Kong, about 70% of people expressed anxiety about getting SARS and people reported they believed they were more likely to contract SARS than the common cold.[14] Hypervigilance, for example, can arise because of fear and anxiety and, in severe cases, result in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and/or depression.[15] Another aspect that can complicate mental illness symptoms during such times is discrimination. For example, the 2014 Ebola outbreak was considered an African problem resulting in discrimination against those of African descent.[16] Similarly, the 2009 H1N1 flu outbreak in the USA saw Mexican and migrant workers targeted for discrimination.[17] Since January 2020, the UK and the USA have reported increased reports of violence and hate crimes towards people of Asian descent and an overall rise in Anti-Chinese sentiment because of the spread of COVID-19.[18] Since isolation and quarantine from the loved ones is the norm of the current world situation, it can often precipitate depression and anxiety and often feel they are being ripped off their purpose of living. Isolation is known to cause a lot of stress which can exacerbate feelings of anxiety and uncertainty. Post-Traumatic Stress Having to be isolated from the society being affected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and the fear of transmitting it to the loved ones, patients are prone to experience PTSD which could affect the mental wellbeing of an individual in the long run. Psychological trauma can result in mixture of emotional surges like nightmares, self-blame, flashbacks, and experiencing recurrent thoughts of the trauma.[19] This could happen to the patients as well as to the health care providers. Risk factors that makes patients susceptible to PTSD are self-quarantine, self-isolation, fear of death social discrimination, witnessing others becoming sick and dying and so on. Similarly, for health care professionals, COVID-19 has brought innumerous challenges.[6] Witnessing frequent deaths, fear of acquiring the infection, spreading to the other family members, lack of adequate personal protective equipment's etc., can expose them to recurrent mental trauma and to PTSD.[20] A study was conducted in China on patients who were infected with COVID-19.[21] Online assessment using a 17 item self-reported PTSD checklist (PCL-C) was used. A total of PCL-C score of ≥ 50 is an indication of 'having significant posttraumatic stress symptoms. A total of 730 COVID-19 patients were assigned in the study and the prevalence of significant posttraumatic stress symptoms was 996.2% (95% CI: 94.8% -97.6%). In addition to the psychological impact, a recent report suggested immune dysregulation in patients suffering from chronic stress secondary to PTSD which might make them prone to opportunistic infections like COVID-19 pneumonia.[22] Information Adding Anxiety and Fear In a crisis like this, it's a common interest of people to find out as much information as possible to stay tuned on what is going on around them people are consuming information on every platform available like WhatsApp, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and many others, which necessarily does not contain accurate information. Subjects who used updates via phone text messages and used social media for critical updates during the lockdown had higher chances of exposing themselves to false information and stress [Figure 1]. Higher acute stress was seen in heavy social media users in the study. This report highlights the importance of releasing substantive official updates at regular intervals during a crisis event and monitoring social media to reduce exposure to misleading information and distress 36.2% (95% CI: 94.8% -97.6%).[21] Other factors that could contribute to the anxiety and mental unrest are fear of losing job, financial crisis, interruption in studies, physical inactivity, running out of medicines, lack of sleep, social isolation, fear of acquiring infection.[23 24 25 26] Figure 1 Pictorial description of the potential concerns of a person during COVID-19 When we are grappling with this gigantic global crisis humans can get creative with their social interactions and can even have trivia nights with your coworkers or friends or maybe even have a virtual date night. Having this social connection can improve not just your mental health but your physical health as well. These social interactions give us a sense of togetherness as a species in our fight against this virus. Moreover, experts suggest having a daily routine can help fight anxiety during this unprecedented time. Having a routine while maintaining the sleep cycle can have a positive impact.[27] Emerging Role of Telemedicine in Psychiatry The impact of isolation can be more severe in individuals with preexisting mental illness, with worsening of anxiety, depression, despair, and feeling of loss of control. Coping with pandemic can get especially difficult when patient's access to its primary source of support and care is restricted. There is a tremendous role of psychotherapy in the treatment of anxiety, depression, and PTSD, and other mental illnesses. Not only do regular visits to the clinic help in getting appropriate therapy and care, but they also add a good working schedule for individuals. Patients suffering with alcoholism and other substance use disorders who are associated with various deaddiction programs might also find it difficult to refill their prescribed medications like methadone, suboxone, etc., Also, it is difficult to continue their engagement with support groups, and programs due to closure of these societies. However, despite knowing the importance of in person encounter in clinical practice of psychiatry, unfortunately due to the fear of community transmission, cross infections, and other logistic reasons of lockdown, travel restrictions, and limited health care access, health care providers are not able to execute their health services to their patients suffering from various mental health issues. Telemedicine service has proved itself as an important asset, and a way of effective communication between patients and their physicians.[28] It has especially proven to be of great benefit for patients with mental conditions to receive psychoeducation in a timely fashion via using telemedicine and remote medical care services.[29] This will be of utmost importance especially in patients who are having active psychiatric disease flare up.[29 30] Kalin et al. recently share their successful institutional experience with telemedicine in the inpatient setting. They shared their experience based on 110 tele encounters during inpatient psychiatry consults.[31] They could successfully accomplish an effective dialogue exchange and were able to execute supportive psychotherapy during tele encounters. Although, in our opinion a telemedicine is certainly an immediate solution to provide the supportive therapy to patients, it can never replace the impact, and positive outcome of an in-person meeting. Also, it might not be possible to communicate and engage in an effective conversation in patients who are mentally challenged or in children with ADHD, autism, etc., A healthy parenting might help in such scenarios till the regular clinic visits services are resumed. Conclusion From the mental health perspective, so far, the COVID-19 pandemic has been extremely challenging. With the uncertainty of the current living situation, people with preexisting mental illnesses like PTSD, anxiety, depression, and severe persistent mental illness are prone to having worsening of their conditions, and studies from the past pandemics reflect the same. Time-bound behavioral therapy should be provided to persons who exhibit signs of mental disorders to reduce the cognitive effects of the pandemic. Psychiatrists and psychotherapists should maximize the use of telemedicine services use to connect to their patients. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          COVID-19 exacerbating inequalities in the US

          COVID-19 does not affect everyone equally. In the US, it is exposing inequities in the health system. Aaron van Dorn, Rebecca E Cooney, and Miriam L Sabin report from New York. In the US, New York City has so far borne the brunt of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, with the highest reported number of cases and the highest death toll in the country. The first COVID-19 case in the city was reported on March 1, but community transmission was firmly established on March 7. As of April 14, New York State has tested nearly half a million people, among whom 195 031 have tested positive. In New York City alone, 106 763 people have tested positive and 7349 have died. “New York is the canary in the coal mine. What happens to New York is going to wind up happening to California, and Washington State and Illinois. It's just a matter of time”, said New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, while asking for greater federal assistance. The response within New York City, known for its historically strong public health responses, has been to ramp up for the surge, but also to tailor the approach to address some of the most basic touchpoints that could worsen health outcomes, including providing three meals a day to all New York residents in need. Oxiris Barbot, commissioner of the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene stated, “Our primary focus at this moment has to be on keeping our city's communities safe. This means supporting the public hospitals with supplies; connecting underserved people to free access to care; and delivering health guidance through the trusted voices of community organizations. The COVID-19 pandemic will come to an end eventually, but what is needed afterward is a renewed focus to ensure that health is not a byproduct of privilege. Public health has a fundamental role to play in shaping our future to be more just and equitable.” Confirming existing disparities, within New York City and other urban centres, African American and other communities of colour have been especially affected by the COVID-10 pandemic. Across the country, deaths due to COVID-19 are disproportionately high among African Americans compared with the population overall. In Milwaukee, WI, three quarters of all COVID-19 related deaths are African American, and in St Louis, MO, all but three people who have died as a result of COVID-19 were African American. According to Sharrelle Barber of Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health (Philadelphia, PA, USA), the pre-existing racial and health inequalities already present in US society are being exacerbated by the pandemic. “Black communities, Latino communities, immigrant communities, Native American communities—we're going to bear the disproportionate brunt of the reckless actions of a government that did not take the proper precautions to mitigate the spread of this disease”, Barber said. “And that's going to be overlaid on top of the existing racial inequalities.” Part of the disproportionate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on communities of colour has been structural factors that prevent those communities from practicing social distancing. Minority populations in the US disproportionally make up “essential workers” such as retail grocery workers, public transit employees, and health-care workers and custodial staff. “These front-line workers, disproportionately black and brown, then are typically a part of residentially segregated communities”, said Barber. “They don't have that privilege of quote unquote ‘staying at home’, connecting those individuals to the communities they are likely to be a part of because of this legacy of residential segregation, or structural racism in our major cities and most cities in the United States.” The negative consequences of health disparities for people who live in rural areas in the US were already a problem before the pandemic. Underserved African Americans face higher HIV incidence and greater maternal and infant mortality rates. Undocumented Latino communities working in rural industries such as farming, poultry, and meat production often have no health insurance. Poor white communities have been badly hit by the opioid crisis and across rural areas, especially in the southern states, high rates of non-communicable diseases are driven by conditions such as obesity. With higher COVID-19 mortality among those with underlying health conditions, these areas could be hit hard. © 2020 Spencer Platt/Getty Images 2020 Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. 14 US states (mostly in the south and the Plains) have refused to accept the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion, leaving millions of the poorest and sickest Americans without access to health care, with the added effect of leaving many regional and local hospitals across the US closed or in danger of closing because of the high cost of medical care and a high proportion of rural uninsured and underinsured people. People with COVID-19 in those states will have poor access to the kind of emergency and intensive care they will need. Native American populations also have disproportionately higher levels of underlying conditions, such as heart disease and diabetes, that would make them particularly at risk of complications from COVID-19. Health care for Native American communities has a unique place in the US. As part of treaty obligations owed by the US government to tribal groups, the Indian Health Service (IHS) provides direct point of care health care for the 2·6 million Native Americans living on tribal reservations. According to the IHS, there are currently 985 confirmed cases of COVID-19 on tribal reservations, and 536 cases in the Navajo Nation alone (the largest reservation). However, the IHS's ability to respond to the crisis might be limited: according to according to Kevin Allis, Chief Executive Officer of the National Congress of American Indians, the largest Native American advocacy organisation, the IHS has only 1257 hospital beds and 36 intensive care units, and many people covered by the IHS are hours away from the nearest IHS facility. The IHS also does not cover care from external providers. Although there is a provision of the CARES Act stimulus bill that is intended to cover those costs, it is unclear how effective it would be if someone covered by the IHS is transferred to a non-IHS facility. © 2020 Reuters/Kevin Lamarque 2020 Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. The CARES Act also included US$8 billion to supplement the health and economies of Native Americans and Alaska Natives. Even that number was an increase from what President Donald Trump's administration originally wanted. “We knew the White House wanted to give us nothing”, Allis said. “And senate Republicans were okay with a billion and it fine-tuned its way to $8 billion.” But the deep history of injustice by the US government towards these people means that the US response will be looked on with suspicion. At the national level, the response has varied widely by state, with many states that voted for Trump in 2016—notably Florida, Texas, and Georgia—responding to the emerging pandemic later and with more lax measures. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, a Republican Trump ally, was slow to implement social-distancing measures and close non-essential businesses, and Georgia Governor Brian Kemp ordered beaches closed by local authorities to be reopened on April 3. However, the trend has not been universal: in Ohio, Republican Governor Mike DeWine was swift in issuing orders to shut non-essential businesses and in responding to the crisis. The federal response has also been overtly political. States with governors that Trump sees as political allies (such as Florida), have received the full measure of requested personal protective equipment from the federal stockpile, while states with governors whom Trump identifies as political enemies (such as New York's Cuomo, Oregon's Jay Inslee, and Michigan's Gretchen Whitmer, all Democrats) have received only a fraction of their requests. Trump has also publicly attacked the responses of those governors on Twitter and during his daily briefings. In distributing funds made available by the CARES Act, Trump also appears to be playing favourites: New York received only a fraction of the $30 billion hospital relief funds from the bill ($12 000 per patient), while other states much more lightly affected received more ($300 000 per patient in Montana and Nebraska, and more than $470 000 per patient in West Virginia, all states that voted for Trump in 2016). Although the numbers of reported cases seem to be levelling off in New York City and other urban areas, perhaps evidence that social-distancing measures are beginning to have an effect, emerging morbidity and mortality data have already clearly demonstrated what many have feared: a pandemic in which the brunt of the effects fall on already vulnerable US populations, and in which the deeply rooted social, racial, and economic health disparities in the country have been laid bare.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation, and symptoms of depression and anxiety among older Americans (NSHAP): a longitudinal mediation analysis

            Research indicates that social isolation and loneliness increase the risk of mental disorders, but less is known about the distinct contributions of different aspects of isolation. We aimed to distinguish the pathways through which social disconnectedness (eg, small social network, infrequent social interaction) and perceptions of social isolation (eg, loneliness, perceived lack of support) contribute to anxiety and depression symptom severity in community-residing older adults aged 57-85 years at baseline.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The effect of age, gender, income, work, and physical activity on mental health during coronavirus disease (COVID-19) lockdown in Austria

              Background The impact of Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and the governmental restrictions on mental health have been reported for different countries. This study evaluated mental health during COVID-19 lockdown in Austria and the effect of age, gender, income, work, and physical activity. Methods An online survey was performed through Qualtrics® after four weeks of lockdown in Austria to recruit a representative sample regarding gender, age, education, and region. Indicators of mental health were quality of life (WHO-QOL BREF), well-being (WHO-5), depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), stress (PSS-10), and sleep quality (ISI). Results In total, N = 1005 individuals were included (53% women). 21% scored above the cut off ≥10 points (PHQ-9) for moderate depressive symptoms, 119% scored above the cut-off ≥10 points (GAD-7) for moderate anxiety symptoms, and 16% above the cut-off ≥15 points (ISI) for clinical insomnia. ANOVAs, Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc tests, and t-tests showed highest mental health problems in adults under 35 years, women, people with no work, and low income (all p-values <.05). Comparisons with a large Austrian sample recruited within the ATHIS 2014 study showed increases of depression and decreases of quality of life in times of COVID-19 as compared to before COVID-19. Conclusions Depressive symptoms (21%) and anxiety symptoms (19%) are higher during COVID-19 compared to previous epidemiological data. 16% rated over the cut-off for moderate or severe clinical insomnia. The COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown seems particularly stressful for younger adults (<35 years), women, people without work, and low income.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Family Med Prim Care
                J Family Med Prim Care
                JFMPC
                Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
                Wolters Kluwer - Medknow (India )
                2249-4863
                2278-7135
                October 2020
                30 October 2020
                : 9
                : 10
                : 5415-5418
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Psychiatry, Penn State College of Medicine, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
                [2 ] New York Institute of English and Business, New York, USA
                [3 ] Department of Medicine, Saint Vincent Hospital, Worcester, USA
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Dr. Kamal Kant Sahu, Saint Vincent Hospital, Worcester 01608, USA. E-mail: drkksahu85@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                JFMPC-9-5415
                10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1572_20
                7773080
                33409238
                ac1709b9-ed6d-4c62-bd69-74e1de591018
                Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care

                This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                : 02 August 2020
                : 18 August 2020
                Categories
                Letter to Editor

                Comments

                Comment on this article