5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Diagnosis and Management Approaches for Cerebellar Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review of Cases

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cerebellar hydatid cysts are uncommon lesions, with limited cases reported in the literature. This systematic review aimed to summarize current diagnostic and management approaches, given the low suspicion index of hydatid cysts in the cerebellum. The review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under registration number CRD42023437853. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-P) reporting guidelines. Two independent researchers searched PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases on June 27, 2023. We included 15 studies published between 1965 and 2022, comprising 12 case reports and three case series. A pooled analysis of reported cases (nine females and seven males) with cerebellar hydatid cysts revealed a mean age of 24 ± 20 years. Most of the cases were reported in Turkish hospitals ( n = 8). The prominent signs and symptoms observed were headaches (10, 62.5%), ataxic gait (9, 56.25%), and visual disturbances (9, 56.25%). The time from symptom onset to hospital visit varied, with most patients seeking medical attention within the first three months. The left cerebellar hemisphere was the most common location of the cysts (6, 37.5%), and compression of the fourth ventricle was frequently observed. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were the primary diagnostic tools used in three-fourths of cases, and surgical intervention was the primary treatment approach. Albendazole and praziquantel were commonly prescribed postoperatively, and two patients underwent preoperative needle decompression. This systematic review contributes to a better understanding of cerebellar hydatid cysts and guides future research and clinical management of this entity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews

          Background Synthesis of multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in a systematic review can summarize the effects of individual outcomes and provide numerical answers about the effectiveness of interventions. Filtering of searches is time consuming, and no single method fulfills the principal requirements of speed with accuracy. Automation of systematic reviews is driven by a necessity to expedite the availability of current best evidence for policy and clinical decision-making. We developed Rayyan (http://rayyan.qcri.org), a free web and mobile app, that helps expedite the initial screening of abstracts and titles using a process of semi-automation while incorporating a high level of usability. For the beta testing phase, we used two published Cochrane reviews in which included studies had been selected manually. Their searches, with 1030 records and 273 records, were uploaded to Rayyan. Different features of Rayyan were tested using these two reviews. We also conducted a survey of Rayyan’s users and collected feedback through a built-in feature. Results Pilot testing of Rayyan focused on usability, accuracy against manual methods, and the added value of the prediction feature. The “taster” review (273 records) allowed a quick overview of Rayyan for early comments on usability. The second review (1030 records) required several iterations to identify the previously identified 11 trials. The “suggestions” and “hints,” based on the “prediction model,” appeared as testing progressed beyond five included studies. Post rollout user experiences and a reflexive response by the developers enabled real-time modifications and improvements. The survey respondents reported 40% average time savings when using Rayyan compared to others tools, with 34% of the respondents reporting more than 50% time savings. In addition, around 75% of the respondents mentioned that screening and labeling studies as well as collaborating on reviews to be the two most important features of Rayyan. As of November 2016, Rayyan users exceed 2000 from over 60 countries conducting hundreds of reviews totaling more than 1.6M citations. Feedback from users, obtained mostly through the app web site and a recent survey, has highlighted the ease in exploration of searches, the time saved, and simplicity in sharing and comparing include-exclude decisions. The strongest features of the app, identified and reported in user feedback, were its ability to help in screening and collaboration as well as the time savings it affords to users. Conclusions Rayyan is responsive and intuitive in use with significant potential to lighten the load of reviewers.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement.

              To develop an evidence-based guideline for Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS) for systematic reviews (SRs), health technology assessments, and other evidence syntheses.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cureus
                Cureus
                2168-8184
                Cureus
                Cureus (Palo Alto (CA) )
                2168-8184
                5 May 2024
                May 2024
                : 16
                : 5
                : e59706
                Affiliations
                [1 ] School of Medicine, Mutah University, Al Karak, JOR
                [2 ] Department of Nursing, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT
                [3 ] College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, SAU
                Author notes
                Abdulqadir J. Nashwan anashwan@ 123456hamad.qa
                Article
                10.7759/cureus.59706
                11150857
                38841019
                ac077c9e-e26b-4bb5-b4a1-6eca6d7188ec
                Copyright © 2024, Jaradat et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 5 May 2024
                Categories
                Neurology
                Neurosurgery
                Infectious Disease

                management,diagnosis,echinococcus,cerebellum,risk factor,cerebellar hydatid cysts,systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article