2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Long‐Term Stability and Safety of the Soundbridge Coupled to the Round Window

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          The objective of the study was to demonstrate the long‐term outcomes of patients implanted with the active middle ear implant (AMEI) Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) through coupling the floating mass transducer (FMT) to the round window (RW).

          Methods

          This retrospective study evaluated the short‐ and long‐term clinical performance (audiological outcomes) and safety (revisions/explantations) of the VSB coupled to the RW between 2013 and 2019 at the St. Pölten University Hospital, Austria. For the outcome analysis, the sample was divided into a short‐term examination group followed up for less than 12 months (<12 months) and a long‐term examination group followed up for more than 12 months (>12 months). Cumulative survival outcomes were separately analyzed for subjects with and without cholesteatoma.

          Results

          46 patients with an average long‐term follow‐up period of 31.43 months (13–75 months) were investigated. Complications requiring revision surgery were reported in total in seven patients with cholesteatoma (15.2%) and none in subjects without cholesteatoma (0%). Residual hearing was not affected by VSB surgery. Word understanding on the Freiburger monosyllabic speech test improved significantly at 65 dB ( P < .0001) and 80 dB ( P < .0001), and these outcomes were stable for long‐term follow up.

          Conclusion

          The VSB coupled to the RW is a safe implantation method for patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss. Hearing improvement was stable for the long‐term follow‐up up to 74 months. The revision rates are directly related to the underlying pathology of cholesteatoma (with radical cavity); thus, this special cohort requires additional counseling on potential complications.

          Level of Evidence

          4 (Case‐series) Laryngoscope, 131:E1434–E1442, 2021

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Safety and effectiveness of the Vibrant Soundbridge in treating conductive and mixed hearing loss: A systematic review

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The vibrant soundbridge for conductive and mixed hearing losses: European multicenter study results.

            The Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) is an active middle ear implant, 'direct-drive' hearing system for the treatment of hearing loss. Recently, the VSB has been applied to conductive and mixed hearing losses. The aim of this study is to evaluate aided benefit, speech recognition in quiet and noise, subjective benefits, changes in residual hearing, and medical and surgical complications in adults with conductive or mixed hearing losses implanted with the VSB using Round Window (RW) Vibroplasty. Twelve German-speaking adults participated in a single-subject, repeated measures study design comparing their performance using the VSB with their own unaided preoperative performance. Hearing performance and changes in residual hearing were assessed using routine audiometric measures, sound field thresholds, and word and sentence recognition in quiet and in noise. Subjective benefits, including subjective hearing performance, device satisfaction, and quality of life were evaluated using the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, the Hearing Device Satisfaction Scale, and the Glasgow Benefit Inventory, respectively. Aided hearing thresholds, word recognition at conversational levels, and sentence recognition in quiet and noise were significantly improved without significant changes in residual cochlear hearing and without major medical and surgical complications. One subject required repositioning surgery to improve transducer coupling with the RW membrane. Subjective benefit and device satisfaction were good, as were overall and general quality of life. The VSB, implanted using RW vibroplasty, is a safe and effective treatment for adults with conductive and mixed hearing losses who may have few, if any, other options. Copyright (c) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Long‐Term Outcome of Hearing Rehabilitation With An Active Middle Ear Implant

              Objective To assess the audiological and long‐term medical and technical follow‐up outcomes of an active middle ear implant. Methods This was a retrospective medical chart analysis of all patients provided with an active middle ear implant in a tertiary academic medical referral center between September 1, 1998, and July 31, 2015. Main outcome measures were medical and technical complications, revisions, reimplantations, explantations, coupling approaches, mean time of use, pre‐ and postoperative hearing thresholds, functional hearing gain across frequencies (250–4,000 Hz), and Freiburg monosyllablic word test at 65 dB. Results One hundred and three patients were identified. Fifteen were implanted bilaterally (n = 118 Vibrant Soundbridge devices [MED‐EL, Innsbruck, Austria]). Seventy‐seven devices were implanted for sensorineural and 41 for mixed and conductive hearing loss. Patients used the implant for 6.7 years (range 0.7 months–17.9 years) on average. Ninety‐one patients (77.12%) were using the device at the end of the observation period. An overall complication rate of 16.1% was observed. The revision and explantation rates were higher for devices implanted between 2004 and 2006. The device failure rate was 3.4%. Audiological evaluation showed significant hearing gains for both hearing loss patient groups. Conclusion This long‐term follow‐up reveals the reliability of the active middle ear implant in a single center. Overall complication rate and device failure rate are acceptable. The complication rate was higher during implementation of alternative coupling approaches. The audiological benefit was satisfactory in patients with all hearing loss types. The majority of implanted patients used the implant at the end of the observation period. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 129:477–481, 2019
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                georg.sprinzl@stpoelten.lknoe.at
                Journal
                Laryngoscope
                Laryngoscope
                10.1002/(ISSN)1531-4995
                LARY
                The Laryngoscope
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                0023-852X
                1531-4995
                19 November 2020
                May 2021
                : 131
                : 5 ( doiID: 10.1002/lary.v131.5 )
                : E1434-E1442
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery University Clinic St. Poelten St. Poelten Austria
                [ 2 ] Karl Landsteiner Institute of Implantable Hearing Devices St. Poelten Austria
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Send correspondence to Georg Mathias Sprinzl, Dunant‐Platz 1, 3100 St. Poelten, Austria, E‐mail: georg.sprinzl@ 123456stpoelten.lknoe.at

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4936-1424
                Article
                LARY29269
                10.1002/lary.29269
                8246711
                33210744
                abce76e4-08a8-42c3-b592-79c294c59aa5
                © 2020 The Authors. The Laryngoscope published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society Inc, "The Triological Society" and American Laryngological Association (ALA).

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 30 October 2020
                : 01 September 2020
                : 03 November 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 3, Pages: 9, Words: 4822
                Categories
                Comprehensive Otolaryngology
                Comprehensive Otolaryngology
                E‐Only Articles
                Original Reports
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                May 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.2 mode:remove_FC converted:01.07.2021

                Otolaryngology
                round window,vsb,vibrant soundbridge,amei,active middle ear implant,implantation,long‐term,follow‐up,performance

                Comments

                Comment on this article