Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
149
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Despite having made significant inroads into many traditionally male-dominated fields (e.g., biology, chemistry), women continue to be underrepresented in computer science and engineering. We propose that students’ stereotypes about the culture of these fields—including the kind of people, the work involved, and the values of the field—steer girls away from choosing to enter them. Computer science and engineering are stereotyped in modern American culture as male-oriented fields that involve social isolation, an intense focus on machinery, and inborn brilliance. These stereotypes are compatible with qualities that are typically more valued in men than women in American culture. As a result, when computer science and engineering stereotypes are salient, girls report less interest in these fields than their male peers. However, altering these stereotypes—by broadening the representation of the people who do this work, the work itself, and the environments in which it occurs—significantly increases girls’ sense of belonging and interest in the field. Academic stereotypes thus serve as gatekeepers, driving girls away from certain fields and constraining their learning opportunities and career aspirations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance.

            C Steele (1997)
            A general theory of domain identification is used to describe achievement barriers still faced by women in advanced quantitative areas and by African Americans in school. The theory assumes that sustained school success requires identification with school and its subdomains; that societal pressures on these groups (e.g., economic disadvantage, gender roles) can frustrate this identification; and that in school domains where these groups are negatively stereotyped, those who have become domain identified face the further barrier of stereotype threat, the threat that others' judgments or their own actions will negatively stereotype them in the domain. Research shows that this threat dramatically depresses the standardized test performance of women and African Americans who are in the academic vanguard of their groups (offering a new interpretation of group differences in standardized test performance), that it causes disidentification with school, and that practices that reduce this threat can reduce these negative effects.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: the costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management.

              Three experiments tested and extended recent theory regarding motivational influences on impression formation (S. T. Fiske & S. L. Neuberg, 1990; J. L. Hilton & J. M. Darley, 1991) in the context of an impression management dilemma that women face: Self-promotion may be instrumental for managing a competent impression, yet women who self-promote may suffer social reprisals for violating gender prescriptions to be modest. Experiment 1 investigated the influence of perceivers' goals on processes that inhibit stereotypical thinking, and reactions to counterstereotypical behavior. Experiments 2-3 extended these findings by including male targets. For female targets, self-promotion led to higher competence ratings but incurred social attraction and hireability costs unless perceivers were outcome-dependent males. For male targets, self-effacement decreased competence and hireability ratings, though its effects on social attraction were inconsistent.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                11 February 2015
                2015
                : 6
                : 49
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychology, University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA
                [2] 2Institute for Learning & Brain Sciences, University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA
                Author notes

                Edited by: Stephen J. Ceci, Cornell University, USA

                Reviewed by: Andrei Cimpian, University of Illinois, USA; Toni Schmader, University of British Columbia, Canada

                *Correspondence: Sapna Cheryan, Department of Psychology, University ofWashington, Box 351525, Seattle, WA 98195, USA e-mail: scheryan@ 123456uw.edu

                This article was submitted to Developmental Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology.

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049
                4323745
                25717308
                abba58d2-1196-4bc9-ab8a-807cc2fd3169
                Copyright © 2015 Cheryan, Master and Meltzoff.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 17 October 2014
                : 10 January 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 68, Pages: 8, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Hypothesis and Theory Article

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                science,underrepresentation,belonging,gender,stereotypes
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                science, underrepresentation, belonging, gender, stereotypes

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content41

                Cited by104

                Most referenced authors373