4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Phantom limb syndrome induced by combined spinal and epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing elective open gynecological surgery

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          During regional anesthesia, including combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (CSEA), patients may develop a perceptual alteration of limb position known as phantom limb syndrome (PLS). We aimed to identify factors that influence the PLS onset, to explore whether PLS predisposes to other postoperative symptoms, and to document the relationship between PLS and sensorimotor impairment during recovery.

          Methods:

          Psychological questionnaires for anxiety and depression were completed beforehand, then multimodal tests of sensory and motor function, especially tests of proprioception, were performed regularly afterward. Two hundred participants undergoing elective gynecological surgery under CSEA reported their experiences of PLS and other symptoms using Likert rating scales.

          Results:

          Prolonged preoperative fasting (odds ratio (OR) 2.34; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.21–4.52), and surgical history (OR 2.56; 95% CI 1.16–5.62) predisposed to PLS, but patients with more extensive anesthetic histories may be at lower risk (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.31–1.08). Furthermore, significant correlations were observed between the recovery from PLS and the perception of joint movement within the deafferented area (R = 0.82, P < .01) and motor functions (R = 0.68). PLS increases the chance of experiencing postoperative fatigue, physical discomfort, and emotional upset.

          Conclusion:

          This study is the first to have identified the risk factors for PLS, assessed the relationship between PLS and postoperative sensorimotor impairment, and its influence on postoperative complications.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Some proprioceptive influences on the perceptual representation of body shape and orientation.

          Perception of the surface contour of the body is generally thought to depend on topographically organized neural maps of somatosensation in the thalamus and cortex. Recent neurophysiological studies indicate that these maps are potentially modifiable through alterations in their sensory input. We present evidence that the apparent shape and orientation of the body can be changed within seconds by using muscle vibration to generate proprioceptive misinformation about limb position. Depending on the position of the hands or feet in relation to the rest of the body and to the test chamber, it is possible to generate systematic perceptual distortions of the body and changes in the apparent orientation of the body. Some implications of these observations for the maintenance of an accurate body schema, for spatial orientation, and for the encoding of ocular position are described.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Immediate and long-term phantom limb pain in amputees: incidence, clinical characteristics and relationship to pre-amputation limb pain.

            In a prospective study 58 patients undergoing limb amputation were interviewed the day before operation about their pre-amputation limb pain and 8 days, 6 months and 2 years after limb loss about their stump and phantom limb pain. All but one patient had experienced pain in the limb prior to amputation. Pre-amputation limb pain lasted less than 1 month in 25% of patients and more than 1 month in the remaining 75% of patients. At the first examination the day before amputation 29% had no limb pain. The incidence of phantom pain 8 days, 6 months and 2 years after amputation was 72, 65 and 59%, respectively. Within the first half year after limb loss phantom pain was significantly more frequent in patients with long-lasting pre-amputation limb pain and in patients with pain in the limb immediately prior to amputation. Phantom pain and pre-amputation pain were similar in both localization and character in 36% of patients immediately after amputation but in only 10% of patients later in the course. Both the localization and character of phantom pain changed within the first half year; no further change occurred later in the course. The incidence of stump pain 8 days, 6 months and 2 years after limb loss was 57, 22 and 21%, respectively. It is suggested that preoperative limb pain plays a role in phantom pain immediately after amputation, but probably not in late persistent phantom pain.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A randomized clinical trial of a brief hypnosis intervention to control side effects in breast surgery patients.

              Breast cancer surgery is associated with side effects, including postsurgical pain, nausea, and fatigue. We carried out a randomized clinical trial to test the hypotheses that a brief presurgery hypnosis intervention would decrease intraoperative anesthesia and analgesic use and side effects associated with breast cancer surgery and that it would be cost effective. We randomly assigned 200 patients who were scheduled to undergo excisional breast biopsy or lumpectomy (mean age 48.5 years) to a 15-minute presurgery hypnosis session conducted by a psychologist or nondirective empathic listening (attention control). Patients were not blinded to group assignment. Intraoperative anesthesia use (i.e., of the analgesics lidocaine and fentanyl and the sedatives propofol and midazolam) was assessed. Patient-reported pain and other side effects as measured on a visual analog scale (0-100) were assessed at discharge, as was use of analgesics in the recovery room. Institutional costs and time in the operating room were assessed via chart review. Patients in the hypnosis group required less propofol (means = 64.01 versus 96.64 microg; difference = 32.63; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.95 to 61.30) and lidocaine (means = 24.23 versus 31.09 mL; difference = 6.86; 95% CI = 3.05 to 10.68) than patients in the control group. Patients in the hypnosis group also reported less pain intensity (means = 22.43 versus 47.83; difference = 25.40; 95% CI = 17.56 to 33.25), pain unpleasantness (means = 21.19 versus 39.05; difference = 17.86; 95% CI = 9.92 to 25.80), nausea (means = 6.57 versus 25.49; difference = 18.92; 95% CI = 12.98 to 24.87), fatigue (means = 29.47 versus 54.20; difference = 24.73; 95% CI = 16.64 to 32.83), discomfort (means = 23.01 versus 43.20; difference = 20.19; 95% CI = 12.36 to 28.02), and emotional upset (means = 8.67 versus 33.46; difference = 24.79; 95% CI = 18.56 to 31.03). No statistically significant differences were seen in the use of fentanyl, midazolam, or recovery room analgesics. Institutional costs for surgical breast cancer procedures were $8561 per patient at Mount Sinai School of Medicine. Patients in the hypnosis group cost the institution $772.71 less per patient than those in the control group (95% CI = 75.10 to 1469.89), mainly due to reduced surgical time. Hypnosis was superior to attention control regarding propofol and lidocaine use; pain, nausea, fatigue, discomfort, and emotional upset at discharge; and institutional cost. Overall, the present data support the use of hypnosis with breast cancer surgery patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Medicine (Baltimore)
                Medicine (Baltimore)
                MEDI
                Medicine
                Wolters Kluwer Health
                0025-7974
                1536-5964
                October 2018
                12 October 2018
                : 97
                : 41
                : e12708
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui
                [b ]Department of Anesthesiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Haerbin Medical University, Haerbin, Heilongjiang, P.R. China.
                Author notes
                []Correspondence: Xuesheng Liu, Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, 218 Jixi Road, Hefei, Anhui 230022, P.R. China (e-mail: liuxuesheng@ 123456ahmu.edu.cn ); Wenzhi Li, Department of Anesthesiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Haerbin Medical University, 148 Baojian Road, Haerbin, Heilongjiang 150086, P.R. China (e-mail: wenzhili9@ 123456126.com ).
                Article
                MD-D-18-03122 12708
                10.1097/MD.0000000000012708
                6203534
                30313067
                ab98ba3a-96cc-4310-b6a9-4d6e79d1f3e4
                Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

                History
                : 2 May 2018
                : 10 September 2018
                Categories
                3300
                Research Article
                Clinical Trial/Experimental Study
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                combined spinal and epidural anesthesia,phantom limb syndrome,postoperative recovery,sensorimotor impairment

                Comments

                Comment on this article