11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Changes in the SF-36 in 12 months in a clinical sample of disadvantaged older adults.

      Medical Care
      Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chronic Disease, rehabilitation, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status Indicators, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), statistics & numerical data, Risk Assessment, United States, epidemiology

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The present study assessed changes in the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) during a 12-month period and examined the relation of those changes to selected baseline characteristics. The study was a 12-month follow-up evaluation of 786 disadvantaged adults aged 50 to 99 years old who had participated in a randomized controlled clinical trial in the general medicine outpatient clinics of a major academic medical center. Descriptive and psychometric analyses of changes in the SF-36 scale scores during a 12-month period were performed, and two series of multivariable logistic regressions of increases or decreases greater than one standard error of measurement (SEM) versus stability on selected baseline characteristics were done. Measures were the eight SF-36 scales. Mean baseline scores on the SF-36 scales were substantially below age-specific national norms. Problematic floor and/or ceiling effects were found for the bodily pain, social function, role--physical, and role--emotional scales, consistent with age-specific national norms. Internal consistency was unacceptable for the general health perceptions scale, adequate for the social function scale, and good for all the other SF-36 scales. Improvements greater than one standard error of measurement were found for between one fifth and one third of the patients, and declines greater than one standard error of measurement were found for between one fifth and one third of the patients. Selected baseline characteristics generally were unrelated to either improvements or declines on the SF-36 scales. The SF-36 scales appear to be sufficiently sensitive for measuring changes in health outcomes during a 1-year period in older patients with debilitating disease. Little of the measured change, however, was predictable.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          49
          0
          33
          0
          Smart Citations
          49
          0
          33
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content95

          Cited by5