21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of a Mobile-Based Immunization Decision Support System for Scheduling Age-Appropriate Vaccine Schedules for Children Younger Than 2 Years in Pakistan and Bangladesh: Lessons From a Multisite, Mixed Methods Study

      research-article
      , BSc, MSc 1 , , MBBS, MSc 2 , , PharmD, MPhil 1 , , MBBS, MPhil 2 , , MPH, MD, PhD 2 , , MBBS, MPH, PhD 1 , 3 , , MPH, MD, PhD 1 , 2 ,
      (Reviewer), (Reviewer)
      JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
      JMIR Publications
      missed opportunities for vaccination, mobile-based immunization decision support system, catch-up immunizations

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Missed opportunities for vaccination (MOVs), that is, when children interact with the health system but fail to receive age-eligible vaccines, pose a crucial challenge for equitable and universal immunization coverage. Inaccurate interpretations of complex catch-up schedules by health workers contribute to MOVs.

          Objective

          We assessed the feasibility of a mobile-based immunization decision support system (iDSS) to automatically construct age-appropriate vaccination schedules for children and to prevent MOVs.

          Methods

          A sequential exploratory mixed methods study was conducted at 6 immunization centers in Pakistan and Bangladesh. An android-based iDSS that is packaged in the form of an application programming interface constructed age-appropriate immunization schedules for eligible children. The diagnostic accuracy of the iDSS was measured by comparing the schedules constructed by the iDSS with the gold standard of evaluation (World Health Organization–recommended Expanded Programme on Immunization schedule constructed by a vaccines expert). Preliminary estimates were collected on the number of MOVs among visiting children (caused by inaccurate vaccination scheduling by vaccinators) that could be reduced through iDSS by comparing the manual schedules constructed by vaccinators with the gold standard. Finally, the vaccinators’ understanding, perceived usability, and acceptability of the iDSS were determined through interviews with key informants.

          Results

          From July 5, 2019, to April 11, 2020, a total of 6241 immunization visits were recorded from 4613 eligible children. Data were collected for 17,961 immunization doses for all antigens. The iDSS correctly scheduled 99.8% (17,932/17,961) of all age-appropriate immunization doses compared with the gold standard. In comparison, vaccinators correctly scheduled 96.8% (17,378/17,961) of all immunization doses. A total of 3.2% (583/17,961) of all due doses (across antigens) were missed in age-eligible children by the vaccinators across both countries. Vaccinators reported positively on the usefulness of iDSS, as well as the understanding and benefits of the technology.

          Conclusions

          This study demonstrated the feasibility of a mobile-based iDSS to accurately construct age-appropriate vaccination schedules for children aged 0 to 23 months across multicountry and low- and middle-income country settings, and underscores its potential to increase immunization coverage and timeliness by eliminating MOVs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical Decision Support Systems for the Practice of Evidence-based Medicine

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The Role of Health Technology and Informatics in a Global Public Health Emergency: Practices and Implications From the COVID-19 Pandemic

            At present, the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is spreading around the world. It is a critical and important task to take thorough efforts to prevent and control the pandemic. Compared with severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, COVID-19 spreads more rapidly owing to increased globalization, a longer incubation period, and unobvious symptoms. As the coronavirus has the characteristics of strong transmission and weak lethality, and since the large-scale increase of infected people may overwhelm health care systems, efforts are needed to treat critical patients, track and manage the health status of residents, and isolate suspected patients. The application of emerging health technologies and digital practices in health care, such as artificial intelligence, telemedicine or telehealth, mobile health, big data, 5G, and the Internet of Things, have become powerful “weapons” to fight against the pandemic and provide strong support in pandemic prevention and control. Applications and evaluations of all of these technologies, practices, and health delivery services are highlighted in this study.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Timeliness of childhood vaccinations in 31 low and middle-income countries.

              This study assessed the extent of delays in childhood vaccinations and examined sociodemographic correlates of delayed and missing vaccinations. Datasets from the 2005-7 Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys from 31 countries were used. Information on vaccinations was based on vaccination cards. Survival analysis was applied to assess age-specific vaccination rates, and multilevel logistic regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with delayed and missing vaccinations. The median vaccination coverage across all countries varied from 91% measles-containing vaccine (MCV) to 98% bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccine (BCG). The median fraction of timely administered vaccinations was 65% (range 14.5-97.2%) for BCG, 67% (11.6-89.3%) for the first dose of vaccine against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (DTP1), 41% (10.8-82.1%) for DTP3, 68% (29.7-90.3%) for the first dose of polio vaccine (polio1), 38% (10.5-81.0%) for polio3 and 51% (22.3-91.1%) for MCV. The median of the median delays across all countries was 2.1 weeks (IQR 0.9-3.0) for BCG, 2.4 weeks (1.5-3.1) for DTP1; 6.3 weeks (3.3-9.0) for DTP3; 2.0 weeks (1.3-3.1) for polio1, 6.6 weeks (4.3-9.3) for polio3 and 4.1 weeks (2.5-5.8) for MCV. A higher number of children in households and lower socioeconomic status were associated with delayed and missing vaccinations; however, the effects of socioeconomic gradient varied by country. Most countries achieved high up-to-date vaccination coverage. However, there were substantial vaccination delays. Collecting information on the timeliness of vaccination in national surveillance systems will provide a more complete view of vaccination coverage. Missing and delayed vaccinations can be addressed jointly in prevention programmes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Pediatr Parent
                JMIR Pediatr Parent
                JPP
                JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                2561-6722
                2023
                17 February 2023
                : 6
                : e40269
                Affiliations
                [1 ] IRD Global Singapore Singapore
                [2 ] IRD Pakistan Karachi Pakistan
                [3 ] IRD Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Subhash Chandir subhash.chandir@ 123456ird.global
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9457-9110
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1338-9620
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9979-619X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8571-1538
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3671-4550
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8133-2634
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6523-8875
                Article
                v6i1e40269
                10.2196/40269
                9984999
                36800221
                a9dabf87-ebd4-4d2d-baf3-8a9377d5711f
                ©Danya Arif Siddiqi, Rozina Feroz Ali, Mubarak Taighoon Shah, Vijay Kumar Dharma, Anokhi Ali Khan, Tapash Roy, Subhash Chandir. Originally published in JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting (https://pediatrics.jmir.org), 17.02.2023.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://pediatrics.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 29 June 2022
                : 29 September 2022
                : 22 November 2022
                : 25 December 2022
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                missed opportunities for vaccination,mobile-based immunization decision support system,catch-up immunizations

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                5
                0
                6
                0
                Smart Citations
                5
                0
                6
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content90

                Cited by2

                Most referenced authors224