1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Fossil marine vertebrates (Chondrichthyes, Actinopterygii, Reptilia) from the Upper Cretaceous of Akkermanovka (Orenburg Oblast, Southern Urals, Russia)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Upper Cretaceous coastal marine deposits are widespread in the Southern Urals with a number of marine vertebrates previously reported from this region. However, previous studies on the vertebrate faunas in this region often lack detailed taxonomic descriptions and illustrations, rendering comparisons to other faunal assemblages difficult. A new diverse vertebrate assemblage comprising cartilaginous and bony fishes, as well as marine reptiles, is described here from the Orenburg region near Akkermanovka (Southern Urals, Russia). Thirty five taxa are identified, including three holocephalans ( Elasmodus sp., Ischyodus yanschini, Chimaeroid indet.), two hybodontiform sharks ( Meristodonoides sp., cf. Polyacrodus sp.), 17 neoselachians ( Paraorthacodus cf. andersoni, Paraorthacodus sp., Synechodus sp., Cederstroemia nilsi, Acrolamna acuminata, Archaeolamna ex gr. kopingensis, Cretalamna sarcoportheta, Cretoxyrhina mantelli, Eostriatolamia segedini, E. venusta, Hispidaspis horridus, H . cf. gigas, Pseudocorax laevis, Pseudoscapanorhynchus compressidens, Scapanorhynchus rhaphiodon, Squalicorax kaupi, Ptychodus rugosus ), a holostean (Lepisosteidae indet.), nine teleosts ( Protosphyraena sp., Saurodontidae indet., cf. Pachyrhizodus sp., Pachyrhizodontidae indet., Enchodus petrosus, E. ferox, E. cf. gladiolus, E. spp., Alepisauroidei indet.), two plesiosaurs (Polycotylidae indet., Plesiosauria indet.), and one mosasaurid (Tylosaurinae indet.). Based on the faunal assemblage, a Santonian–?early Campanian age is proposed. Lamniform sharks are the best represented group in terms of taxic diversity and relative abundance, probably reflecting the peak in diversity this group experienced following the Cenomanian radiation in the Late Cretaceous. The faunal assemblage of Akkermanovka exhibits significant taxonomic overlaps with assemblages reported from Asia and North America, but not from Southern Hemisphere continents, indicating east–west dispersal of several marine taxa during the Late Cretaceous.

          Related collections

          Most cited references351

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Phyletic Relationships of Living Sharks and Rays

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Faunal turnover of marine tetrapods during the Jurassic-Cretaceous transition.

            Marine and terrestrial animals show a mosaic of lineage extinctions and diversifications during the Jurassic-Cretaceous transition. However, despite its potential importance in shaping animal evolution, few palaeontological studies have focussed on this interval and the possible climate and biotic drivers of its faunal turnover. In consequence evolutionary patterns in most groups are poorly understood. We use a new, large morphological dataset to examine patterns of lineage diversity and disparity (variety of form) in the marine tetrapod clade Plesiosauria, and compare these patterns with those of other organisms. Although seven plesiosaurian lineages have been hypothesised as crossing the Jurassic-Cretaceous boundary, our most parsimonious topology suggests the number was only three. The robust recovery of a novel group including most Cretaceous plesiosauroids (Xenopsaria, new clade) is instrumental in this result. Substantial plesiosaurian turnover occurred during the Jurassic-Cretaceous boundary interval, including the loss of substantial pliosaurid, and cryptoclidid diversity and disparity, followed by the radiation of Xenopsaria during the Early Cretaceous. Possible physical drivers of this turnover include climatic fluctuations that influenced oceanic productivity and diversity: Late Jurassic climates were characterised by widespread global monsoonal conditions and increased nutrient flux into the opening Atlantic-Tethys, resulting in eutrophication and a highly productive, but taxonomically depauperate, plankton. Latest Jurassic and Early Cretaceous climates were more arid, resulting in oligotrophic ocean conditions and high taxonomic diversity of radiolarians, calcareous nannoplankton and possibly ammonoids. However, the observation of discordant extinction patterns in other marine tetrapod groups such as ichthyosaurs and marine crocodylomorphs suggests that clade-specific factors may have been more important than overarching extrinsic drivers of faunal turnover during the Jurassic-Cretaceous boundary interval.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Systema Naturae

              This dataset contains the digitized treatments in Plazi based on the original book / thesis / monograph Linnaeus, Carolus (1758): Systema Naturae. Stockholm: Laurentius Salvius, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                101670248
                Cretac Res
                Cretac Res
                Cretaceous research
                0195-6671
                1095-998X
                17 May 2024
                March 2024
                26 May 2024
                : 155
                : 105779
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Palaeontology, University of Vienna, Josef-Holaubek-Platz 2, 1090 Vienna, Austria
                [b ]Vienna Doctoral School of Ecology and Evolution (VDSEE), University of Vienna, Djerassiplatz 1, 1030 Vienna, Austria
                [c ]Department of Geography, Ecology and Natural Management, Ryazan State University named for S. Yesenin, 390000 Ryazan, Russia
                [d ]Museum am Löwentor, Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany
                [e ]Department of Paleontology, Hohenheim University, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
                [f ]Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, Russia
                [g ]Museum of the World Ocean, 236006 Kaliningrad, Russia
                [h ]Institute of Living Systems, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, 236016 Kaliningrad, Russia
                [i ]Borissiak Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, Russia
                [j ]Department of General Geology and Minerals, Saratov State University, 410012 Saratov, Russia
                [k ]Department of Oil and Gas, Saratov State Technical University, 410054 Saratov, Russia
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. Department of Palaeontology, Josef-Holaubek-Platz 2, 1090 Vienna, Austria. patrick.jambura@ 123456gmail.com (P.L. Jambura).
                Article
                EMS196226
                10.1016/j.cretres.2023.105779
                7615991
                38799703
                a9bdf594-de34-4ba7-97f9-326320ce5ad0

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Article

                elasmobranchii,teleostei,lepisosteidae,mosasauridae,polycotylidae,santonian–?early campanian

                Comments

                Comment on this article