13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Robotic-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a European perspective

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Gastrectomy is the mainstay treatment for gastric cancer. To reduce the associated patient burden, minimally invasive gastrectomy was introduced in almost 30 years ago. The increase in the availability of surgical robotic systems led to the first robotic-assisted gastrectomy to be performed in 2002 in Japan. Robotic gastrectomy however, particularly in Europe, has not yet gained significant traction. Most reports to date are from Asia, predominantly containing observational studies. These cohorts are commonly different in the tumour stage, location (particularly with regards to gastroesophageal junctional tumours) and patient BMI compared to those encountered in Europe. To date, no randomised clinical trials have been performed comparing robotic gastrectomy to either laparoscopic or open equivalent. Cohort studies show that robotic gastrectomy is equal oncological outcomes in terms of survival and lymph node yield. Operative times in the robotic group are consistently longer compared to laparoscopic or open gastrectomy, although evidence is emerging that resectional surgical time is equal. The only reproducibly significant difference in favour of robot-assisted gastrectomy is a reduction in intra-operative blood loss and some studies show a reduction in the risk of pancreatic fistula formation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references85

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy.

          Laparoscopic distal partial gastrectomy is still technically difficult under conditions of a pneumoperitoneum because of the lack of appropriate techniques and laparoscopic instruments. We describe here a technique of laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy under an abdominal wall-elevating method.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Decreased Morbidity of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy Compared With Open Distal Gastrectomy for Stage I Gastric Cancer: Short-term Outcomes From a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (KLASS-01).

            To determine the safety of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) compared with open distal gastrectomy (ODG) in patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer in Korea.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies.

              To perform a meta-analysis of high-quality published trials, randomized and observational, comparing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) and open distal gastrectomy (ODG) for gastric cancer. Controversy persists about the clinical utility of minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of gastric cancer. Prospective data is limited to a few small randomized trails. : Studies published from January 1992 to March 2010 that compare LDG and ODG were identified. No restrictions in pathologic stage were applied. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Selection of high-quality, nonrandomized comparative studies (NRCTs) was based on a validated tool (Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies). Mortality, complications, harvested lymph nodes, operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were compared using weighted mean differences (WMDs) and odds ratios (ORs). Twenty-five studies were included in the analyses, 6 RCTs and 19 NRCTs, compromising 3055 patients (1658 LDG, 1397 ODG). LDG was associated with longer operative times (WMD 48.3 minutes; P < 0.001) and lower overall complications (OR 0.59; P < 0.001), medical complications (OR 0.49; P = 0.002), minor surgical complications (OR 0.62; P = 0.001), estimated blood loss (WMD -118.9 mL; P < 0.001), and hospital stay (WMD -3.6 days; P < 0.001). Mortality and major complications were similar. Patients in the ODG group had a significantly higher number of lymph nodes harvested (WMD 3.9 nodes; P < 0.001), although the estimated proportion of patients with less than 15 retrieved nodes was similar (OR 1.26, P = 0.09). LDG can be performed safely with a shorter hospital stay and fewer complications than open surgery. The long-term significance of a difference of less than 5 nodes in the number of harvested lymph nodes remains unclear. Lymph node staging appears to be unaffected. These results need to be validated in Western patients with advanced gastric cancer.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31 (0)88-7558074 , r.vanhillegersberg@umcutrecht.nl
                Journal
                Gastric Cancer
                Gastric Cancer
                Gastric Cancer
                Springer Singapore (Singapore )
                1436-3291
                1436-3305
                4 July 2019
                4 July 2019
                2019
                : 22
                : 5
                : 909-919
                Affiliations
                ISNI 0000000090126352, GRID grid.7692.a, Department of Surgery, G04 228, , University Medical Centre Utrecht, ; Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
                Article
                979
                10.1007/s10120-019-00979-z
                6694090
                31273481
                a9aa3a6d-f71a-4497-8f85-00d82a64a4ad
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 3 May 2019
                : 12 June 2019
                Categories
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                © The International Gastric Cancer Association and The Japanese Gastric Cancer Association 2019

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                gastric cancer,robotic-assisted gastrectomy,rag,outcomes
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                gastric cancer, robotic-assisted gastrectomy, rag, outcomes

                Comments

                Comment on this article