14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Influence of Residual Feed Intake and Cow Age on Beef Cattle Performance, Supplement Intake, Resource Use, and Grazing Behavior on Winter Mixed-Grass Rangelands

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Simple Summary

          Feed efficiency is becoming an important selection tool in the beef cattle industry. Traditionally, feed efficiency of beef cattle has been expressed as the ratio of feed intake to body weight gained; however, selection for high growth rates inevitably increases the maintenance requirements, feed requirements, and intake of cattle, with subsequent higher feed costs. In contrast, net feed efficiency, or residual feed intake (RFI), is defined as the difference between an animal’s actual feed intake and its expected feed requirements for maintenance and growth, with low-RFI animals being more efficient at converting forage intake into kilograms of production than high-RFI animals. This study evaluated the impacts of cow age and RFI on body weight (BW) and body condition score (BCS) change, supplement intake, grazing behavior, and resource use of grazing beef cattle grazing mixed-grass rangelands. Heifer post-weaning RFI had little effect on subsequent performance (BW or BCS), grazing behavior, supplement intake behavior, or resource use. However, cow age significantly influenced subsequent performance, grazing behavior, supplement intake behavior, and resource use. In summary, post-weaning RFI had minimal effects on beef cattle performance, grazing behavior, or resource utilization; however, cow age impacted both grazing behavior and resource use.

          Abstract

          The objectives of this study were to evaluate the influence of RFI and cow age on the supplement intake and grazing behavior of beef cattle. Average daily supplement intake (kg/cow/d) displayed an RFI × cow age interaction ( p < 0.01), with a linear increase in average daily supplement intake with increasing RFI of 3-year-old cows ( p < 0.01). Average daily supplement intake (g ∙ kg BW −1 ∙ d −1) displayed an RFI × cow age interaction ( p < 0.01), with a quadratic effect on supplement intake of 3-year-old cows ( p = 0.01). Cow age displayed a quadratic effect on variation of supplement intake ( p < 0.01), where 1-year-old cows had a greater CV of supplement intake than all other cow ages ( p < 0.01). Distance traveled displayed a cow age × RFI interaction ( p = 0.02), where high-RFI 5-year-old cows traveled further per day than low 5-year-old RFI cows. The probability of grazing site selection was influenced by cow age ( p ≤ 0.03). In summary, heifer post-weaning RFI had minimal effects on beef cattle performance, grazing behavior, or resource utilization; however, cow age impacted both grazing behavior and resource use.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The package “adehabitat” for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Comparison of Usage and Availability Measurements for Evaluating Resource Preference

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The home-range concept: are traditional estimators still relevant with modern telemetry technology?

              Recent advances in animal tracking and telemetry technology have allowed the collection of location data at an ever-increasing rate and accuracy, and these advances have been accompanied by the development of new methods of data analysis for portraying space use, home ranges and utilization distributions. New statistical approaches include data-intensive techniques such as kriging and nonlinear generalized regression models for habitat use. In addition, mechanistic home-range models, derived from models of animal movement behaviour, promise to offer new insights into how home ranges emerge as the result of specific patterns of movements by individuals in response to their environment. Traditional methods such as kernel density estimators are likely to remain popular because of their ease of use. Large datasets make it possible to apply these methods over relatively short periods of time such as weeks or months, and these estimates may be analysed using mixed effects models, offering another approach to studying temporal variation in space-use patterns. Although new technologies open new avenues in ecological research, our knowledge of why animals use space in the ways we observe will only advance by researchers using these new technologies and asking new and innovative questions about the empirical patterns they observe.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Animals (Basel)
                Animals (Basel)
                animals
                Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI
                MDPI
                2076-2615
                23 May 2021
                June 2021
                : 11
                : 6
                : 1518
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Northern Agricultural Research Center, Montana State University, Havre, MT 59501, USA; julia.dafoe@ 123456montana.edu (J.M.D.); samwyffels@ 123456montana.edu (S.A.W.); dboss@ 123456montana.edu (D.L.B.)
                [2 ]Department of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA; timothy.delcurto@ 123456montana.edu
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3533-5022
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2247-9855
                Article
                animals-11-01518
                10.3390/ani11061518
                8224646
                34071121
                a99b84c8-5acb-47cf-a560-04da5cc248ce
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 11 April 2021
                : 19 May 2021
                Categories
                Article

                beef cattle,cow age,grazing behavior,residual feed intake (rfi), resource use,supplement intake

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                10
                0
                1
                0
                Smart Citations
                10
                0
                1
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content31

                Cited by4

                Most referenced authors747