Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
47
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Perceptions of the provision of drug information, pharmaceutical detailing and engagement with non-personal promotion at a large physicians network: a mixed-methods study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Non-personal promotion (NPP) such as digital, print-based marketing, direct promotional visits and free drug samples are means of pharmaceutical marketing. This study described practices of drug information, pharmaceutical detailing and engagement with NPP at an integrated network of providers.

          Design

          This was a sequential explanatory mixed-methods study. A survey was followed by semistructured interviews. The questionnaire elicited preferred sources of drug information, management of drug information and perceptions on drug samples, coupons and pharmaceutical representative visits. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics (quantitative) and content analysis (qualitative).

          Setting

          Face-to-face or telephonic interviews were conducted at a large physicians network in Northern Kentucky.

          Participants

          Eighty-two medical assistants, primary care, specialty providers and other office staff who completed the survey and 16 interviewees.

          Results

          Most respondents were women (79.3%), office managers (26.8%) and individuals employed for 15 years or longer within the organisation (30.5%). Most participants (85.3%) indicated that pharmaceutical representative visits are the most common source of drug information. Paper-based material was the most frequent form in which information was received in physician offices (62.2%). Medical assistants were usually responsible for handling drug information (46.3%) on arrival in the office, compared with 15.3% of physicians. Drug representative detailing and lunches (62.2%) were the desired method of drug information communication followed by electronic mail or e-journals (11%). Interviewees generated three themes that described pharmaceutical representative visits and interactions with prescriber and non-prescriber personnel in the offices.

          Conclusions

          We found significant involvement of non-prescriber personnel in drug information management at primary and specialty care offices. Participants perceived that pharmaceutical representatives have an important role in keeping the offices informed and supplied with relevant drug information, coupons and samples. Findings highlight the importance of engaging prescriber and non-prescriber personnel to guarantee relevant information reaches providers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Doing a Thematic Analysis: A Practical, Step-By-Step Guide for Learning and Teaching Scholars

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Interactions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry generally and sales representatives specifically and their association with physicians’ attitudes and prescribing habits: a systematic review

              Objectives The objective of this review is to explore interactions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry including sales representatives and their impact on physicians’ attitude and prescribing habits. Data sources PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Google scholar electronic databases were searched from 1992 to August 2016 using free-text words and medical subject headings relevant to the topic. Study selection Studies included cross-sectional studies, cohort studies, randomised trials and survey designs. Studies with narrative reviews, case reports, opinion polls and letters to the editor were excluded from data synthesis. Data extraction Two reviewers independently extracted the data. Data on study design, study year, country, participant characteristics, setting and number of participants were collected. Data synthesis Pharmaceutical industry and pharmaceutical sales representative (PSR) interactions influence physicians’ attitudes and their prescribing behaviour and increase the number of formulary addition requests for the company’s drug. Conclusion Physician–pharmaceutical industry and its sales representative’s interactions and acceptance of gifts from the company’s PSRs have been found to affect physicians’ prescribing behaviour and are likely to contribute to irrational prescribing of the company’s drug. Therefore, intervention in the form of policy implementation and education about the implications of these interactions is needed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2021
                18 January 2021
                : 11
                : 1
                : e041098
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentJames L Winkle College of Pharmacy , University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
                [2 ]departmentAmbulatory Care Pharmacy , St. Elizabeth Physicians , Erlanger, Kentucky, USA
                [3 ]departmentGlobal Health , Merkle Inc , Columbia, Maryland, USA
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Ana Hincapie; ana.hincapie@ 123456uc.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6142-1744
                Article
                bmjopen-2020-041098
                10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041098
                7813310
                33462098
                a91b1ca7-c5a0-4e4e-a56d-d0254ccd3dcc
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 29 May 2020
                : 14 December 2020
                : 28 December 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Merkle Inc;
                Award ID: 1015303
                Categories
                Qualitative Research
                1506
                1725
                Original research
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                general medicine (see internal medicine),health services administration & management,quality in health care

                Comments

                Comment on this article