16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Dogs Supporting Human Health and Well-Being: A Biopsychosocial Approach

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Humans have long realized that dogs can be helpful, in a number of ways, to achieving important goals. This is evident from our earliest interactions involving the shared goal of avoiding predators and acquiring food, to our more recent inclusion of dogs in a variety of contexts including therapeutic and educational settings. This paper utilizes a longstanding theoretical framework- the biopsychosocial model- to contextualize the existing research on a broad spectrum of settings and populations in which dogs have been included as an adjunct or complementary therapy to improve some aspect of human health and well-being. A wide variety of evidence is considered within key topical areas including cognition, learning disorders, neurotypical and neurodiverse populations, mental and physical health, and disabilities. A dynamic version of the biopsychosocial model is used to organize and discuss the findings, to consider how possible mechanisms of action may impact overall human health and well-being, and to frame and guide future research questions and investigations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references119

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure.

          D. Russell (1996)
          In this article I evaluated the psychometric properties of the UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3). Using data from prior studies of college students, nurses, teachers, and the elderly, analyses of the reliability, validity, and factor structure of this new version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale were conducted. Results indicated that the measure was highly reliable, both in terms of internal consistency (coefficient alpha ranging from .89 to .94) and test-retest reliability over a 1-year period (r = .73). Convergent validity for the scale was indicated by significant correlations with other measures of loneliness. Construct validity was supported by significant relations with measures of the adequacy of the individual's interpersonal relationships, and by correlations between loneliness and measures of health and well-being. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated that a model incorporating a global bipolar loneliness factor along with two method factor reflecting direction of item wording provided a very good fit to the data across samples. Implications of these results for future measurement research on loneliness are discussed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model.

            G Engel (1980)
            How physicians approach patients and the problems they present is much influenced by the conceptual models around which their knowledge is organized. In this paper the implications of the biopsychosocial model for the study and care of a patient with an acute myocardial infarction are presented and contrasted with approaches used by adherents of the more traditional biomedical model. A medical rather than psychiatric patient was selected to emphasize the unity of medicine and to help define the place of psychiatrists in the education of physicians of the future.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Dataset: not found

              Beck Depression Inventory–II

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Vet Sci
                Front Vet Sci
                Front. Vet. Sci.
                Frontiers in Veterinary Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2297-1769
                30 March 2021
                2021
                : 8
                : 630465
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychiatry, Center for Human Animal Interaction, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University , Richmond, VA, United States
                [2] 2Human-Animal Bond in Colorado, School of Social Work, Colorado State University , Fort Collins, CO, United States
                [3] 3Department of Education, California State Polytechnic University , Pomona, CA, United States
                [4] 4Division of Social Sciences and Natural Sciences, Seaver College, Pepperdine University , Malibu, CA, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Emily Patterson-Kane, Independent Researcher, Rolling Meadows, United States

                Reviewed by: Karen Thodberg, Aarhus University, Denmark; Ruoyu Wang, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom

                *Correspondence: Nancy R. Gee nancy.gee@ 123456vcuhealth.org

                This article was submitted to Veterinary Humanities and Social Sciences, a section of the journal Frontiers in Veterinary Science

                Article
                10.3389/fvets.2021.630465
                8042315
                33860004
                a90afa95-9b79-46b3-8e10-a3a02e97d5df
                Copyright © 2021 Gee, Rodriguez, Fine and Trammell.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 17 November 2020
                : 25 February 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 111, Pages: 11, Words: 8885
                Funding
                Funded by: Annenberg Foundation 10.13039/100000047
                Categories
                Veterinary Science
                Conceptual Analysis

                dog,human health,human-animal interaction,biopsychosocial,canine,mental health

                Comments

                Comment on this article