1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      DSM-5 suicidal behavior disorder: a systematic review of research on clinical utility, diagnostic boundaries, measures, pathophysiology and interventions

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          It has been a decade since Suicidal Behavior Disorder (SBD) was introduced in Section III of the DSM-5 under “Conditions for Further Study”. SBD is chiefly characterized by a self-initiated sequence of behaviors believed at the time of initiation to cause one’s own death and occurring in the last 24 months.

          Aims

          To systematically review empirical studies on SBD to identify primary research themes and promising future research directions.

          Method

          A search of empirical articles on SBD published between May 2013 and March 2023 was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

          Results

          Screening of 73 records by two independent raters yielded 14 eligible articles. The primary research themes identified from these articles included clinical utility of SBD to predict future suicide risk, association of SBD with closely related disorders, psychometric properties of SBD measures, pathophysiology of SBD, and the effectiveness of interventions for people with SBD.

          Conclusion

          Understanding of SBD has slowly progressed since its introduction a decade ago and has mainly been applied in research to define study groups displaying suicidal behavior. The clinical utility of SBD for predicting future suicide risk is low and more research is needed to understand measurement of the diagnosis and its distinctiveness from related disorders and other self-harming behaviors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview: development, reliability, and validity in an adolescent sample.

            The authors developed the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview (SITBI) and evaluated its psychometric properties. The SITBI is a structured interview that assesses the presence, frequency, and characteristics of a wide range of self-injurious thoughts and behaviors, including suicidal ideation, suicide plans, suicide gestures, suicide attempts, and nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI). This initial study, based on the administration of the SITBI to 94 adolescents and young adults, suggested that the SITBI has strong interrater reliability (average kappa = .99, r = 1.0) and test-retest reliability (average kappa = .70, intraclass correlation coefficient = .44) over a 6-month period. Moreover, concurrent validity was demonstrated via strong correspondence between the SITBI and other measures of suicidal ideation (average kappa = .54), suicide attempt (kappa = .65), and NSSI (average kappa = .87). The authors concluded that the SITBI uniformly and comprehensively assesses a wide range of self-injury-related constructs and provides a new instrument that can be administered with relative ease in both research and clinical settings. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The German version of the self-injurious thoughts and behaviors interview (SITBI-G): a tool to assess non-suicidal self-injury and suicidal behavior disorder

              Background Self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs) are common in adolescents. While there is no standardized interview in German to assess SITBs to date, the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview (SITBI) is widely used in English-speaking countries. However, the SITBI has not been validated for the assessment of the recently issued DSM-5 Section 3 diagnoses of nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) and suicidal behavior disorder (SBD) yet. In the present study the psychometric properties of the German version of the SITBI (SITBI-G) were assessed. We also evaluated whether SITBI-G is a reliable and valid instrument to establish diagnoses of NSSI and SBD. Methods A clinical adolescent sample (N = 111, f/m = 73/38, age range = 12-19 years) was recruited from the inpatient units of three departments of child and adolescent psychiatry in Germany. All participating patients were interviewed by using the SITBI-G, and DSM-5 criteria of NSSI and SBD were operationalized from the SITBI-G data. Additionally, participants were given the Self-Harm Behavior Questionnaire (SHBQ), and SITBI-G was retested in a subsample. Results The SITBI-G shows moderate to good test-retest reliability, a very good interrater reliability, and a good construct validity. The results demonstrate that diagnoses of NSSI and SBD can be established using the SITBI-G, achieving moderate to good test-retest reliabilities and very good to perfect interrater reliabilities. Conclusions Overall, the good psychometric properties of SITBI-G are comparable to the original version of the interview. Therefore, SITBI-G seems to be highly appropriate to assess SITBs, including the new DSM-5 Section 3 diagnoses NSSI and SBD in research and clinical contexts. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-014-0265-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2582831Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/66483Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Psychiatry
                Front Psychiatry
                Front. Psychiatry
                Frontiers in Psychiatry
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-0640
                23 January 2024
                2024
                : 15
                : 1278230
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto , Toronto, ON, Canada
                [2] 2 Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough , Toronto, ON, Canada
                Author notes

                Edited by: Laura Orsolini, Marche Polytechnic University, Italy

                Reviewed by: M. David Rudd, University of Memphis, United States

                Giulio Longo, Marche Polytechnic University, Italy

                *Correspondence: Etinosa Oliogu, etinosa.oliogu@ 123456mail.utoronto.ca ; Anthony C. Ruocco, anthony.ruocco@ 123456utoronto.ca
                Article
                10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1278230
                10844467
                38322141
                a8eff877-efcf-41c2-b821-0a0f39ecdcc8
                Copyright © 2024 Oliogu and Ruocco

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 16 August 2023
                : 08 January 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 31, Pages: 7, Words: 3767
                Funding
                The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
                Categories
                Psychiatry
                Mini Review
                Custom metadata
                Psychopathology

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                suicide,suicidal behavior disorder,dsm-5,self-harm,self-harm behavior

                Comments

                Comment on this article